I mostly agree. I was shooting my standard pistol load out of my carbine. If I recall correctly, they were doing 1550 or so at the muzzle. Out of a 6 inch revolver, they do 1350. Very likely the bullet encountered too little resistance to upset. A 125 HP would have been better.
I don't believe you would get 2200 fps. First, you are shoving a heavier than standard for the caliber .358 bullet down a .357 barrel which increases pressure, and you would already be disregarding any published pressure standard for the round without having any way to measure it (I assume you don't have pressure equipment). Ballisticstudies also said a good 200 grain handload for the 35 Remington out of a Marlin 336 is 2100 fps.
Fudging some for safety, I ran a chart for 2000 fps at my altitude (4900 feet). That is a pretty good bullet and, at that velocity, gives you an honest 1652 fps at 200 yards with 9 inches of drop and 1211 foot lbs. Shave some off for the rainbow on a possibly moving target at an unknown range, and I figure that would be a pretty darned good 150-175 yard load. If you shortened the range up to 100, you would be above 1800 fps and would guarantee good bullet performance.
Then again, this is theoretical because you might not have the powder room to achieve that performance with a 200 grain bullet intruding into the powder space. It would be fun to experiment with it.