Lately I've read a lot of posts regarding the safety of Glocks (e.g. no external safety, possibility of negligent discharge if anything finds it's way into the trigger guard, etc). Why doesn't this line of thinking also apply to Kahrs or any other pistol that lacks an external safety and or de-cocker that disengages the hammer? Are more likely to go bang without intention? I'm not asking the merit of Glock vs Brand X nor am I challenging anyone's choice of weapon or their loyalty to brand X. I'm also not trying to stir up another discussion on safe gun handling.
This is a question of mechanics that I don't understand so please don't flame me. I'm trying to get a better idea of what's under the hood and why it matters.
For the record, I have a Glock, a Kahr and a Sig and like them equally.
Thanks
This is a question of mechanics that I don't understand so please don't flame me. I'm trying to get a better idea of what's under the hood and why it matters.
For the record, I have a Glock, a Kahr and a Sig and like them equally.
Thanks