Charlie98
Member
...as the FN PS-90 wasn't an option. I really like mine.
I have a real curiosity of those. Next time I'm in Las Vegas I'm going to rent a full-auto P90 just to take it for a test drive...
...as the FN PS-90 wasn't an option. I really like mine.
have had 2 thompsons, one ruger, one berretta storm and a marlin camp nine. I am a slow learner. they all had some suckness. a 300 blackout replaces them all.
......thompsons are heavy and slow to reload. berretta has plastic fire control parts. the ruger carries lousy with the mag in the mid point. the camp splits stocks at the wrist and has a sucky trigger. sorry for the rant. dc
I thought a carbine was something with a 16'' barrel and a stock of some sort by definition.
A lot of those on the list are pistols.
. . . a Suomi, and a few others.
I saw a shot show report thanks to a post on THR that indicated PSA is about to release an MP5 clone. I would like to see it and the New Ruger before I make a choice.
The reason I am personally looking into a PCC in 9mm is four fold.
#1. I don't have one.
#2. Cheap to shoot.
#3. Indoor range friendly around here.
#4. Low muzzle blast in case of being used for indoors home defense.
The reason I won't go down the SBR path is because in the county I live in, I have to get a Trust set up. I don't want to bother with that.
My PCC carbine experience is limited so far. I've had time behind an honest to gawd M1A1 Thompson in full auto. I've also had time with the FN PS90. I like 'em both, but can't afford a real M1A1 and the PS90 isn't as cheap to shoot as 9mm.
With 100 gr bullet, my PCCs will send them down range at almost 1500 fps for flatter trajectory with reduced vertical stringing from less muzzle velocity variance.None of those reasons are valid. A 9mm pistol will fill those requirements. You'll have to do better.