We're surrounded by defensive tools ...
Absolutely. I've always been of the "improvised weapon" mindset, and really don't see a need to alter items to increase their effectiveness. However, the last time this topic came up I really gave some serious scrutiny to my home and office, and I realized there are literally weapons everywhere. For me the answer is simple. I have several blackthorn walking sticks that I use to hike. Where do I keep them? I simply leave them propped in a few ideal corners throughout my home where they can be easily grabbed by me if someone comes through the door. While I lack training, I can still swing them like a club, and anyone caught in the way is going to have a bad time of it.
But there are literally dozens of items on hand.
Criminals generally have guns. Taking a knife (or other such weapon) to a gun fight is a good way to get killed.
Really? I have never seen data reflecting that. Don't get me wrong, a gun is preferable to me, but that's not the point of the thread at all, there is no harm in having other backup weapons in mind for when you might not have a gun on you, and your statement isn't supported in any way.
Would've been better if the bad guys had went up in flames! What a great way to protect yourself, although if the gas had found a spark, they would all be in trouble!
I can't agree less. While I'm certainly willing to take a life to save my own or a loved one's, I can't think of a much worse way to do it than burning someone to death. Not to mention the potential collateral damage to innocents and the poor guy suffering the attack.
Paradoxically, if your opponent has a gun, you might be safer unarmed than if armed merely with a knife. If you pull out the knife, you'll be shot for sure, as the opponent feels immediately threatened. If you're unarmed, depending on what his motives are, he might leave you alone after robbing you.
I'm sorry but this is complete nonsense. If someone gets the drop on you, you may be better off giving them the THINGS they want, as they are replaceable, regardless of whatever weapon you may have on you. If I have a gun pointed at me and someone wants my wallet, they are going to get my wallet. If I see them coming, I'm reasonably fast, and may make the decision to deploy a gun or a knife, or a stick, or whatever. You are basically advocating a nuclear response or pacifism as your only options, and it is again based on the unproven assumption that anyone trying to rob you has a gun.
The answer is either to carry a gun yourself, or avoid these kinds of situations entirely. Carrying a knife for defensive purposes is just a bad idea. If, by some chance, the bad guy also has a knife (but no gun), he's likely to be far more experienced in this sort of thing than you are. So you lose either way.
Good lord. Some people can't own a gun. Some people won't carry a gun. Some people don't trust their own competence. So carrying something else is a bad idea? Those folks have to stay home? Ever here the phrase "Well it's better than nothing." If you have nothing you are at a disadvantage automatically. And just because you have a weapon, ANY weapon, does not mean using it is always the best response. Personally, I'm not going to kill anyone for the contents of my wallet, or for a phone. Those items are replaceable. If someone clearly means to kill or maim me, then you bet I'm going to fight back at the opportune moment. The one exception is with a break in. If you are in my home, I assume you mean me harm.
And how many criminals are actually taking self defense training courses? Assuming they will be more experienced than you is another bad assumption.