It's really all the same nest, of course. Some part of the market (including the Army) really wants a safety on handguns. Some part really doesn't. Another part is indifferent, I suppose. Glock has been a fabulous success targeting the latter two groups. They've also expended a lot of marketing money persuading people to leave the first group. But that has reached its limits.
If they want to include the first group in their customer base, they'll need to add real, functional, ergonomically-sound safeties as an option. They may not want to. That's cool, they're a private business, they don't have to try to appeal to everyone. They're doing fine without my money. They'll get to continue doing fine without my money. It's their choice, and mine. Freedom is pretty cool.
If they want to include the first group in their customer base, they'll need to add real, functional, ergonomically-sound safeties as an option. They may not want to. That's cool, they're a private business, they don't have to try to appeal to everyone. They're doing fine without my money. They'll get to continue doing fine without my money. It's their choice, and mine. Freedom is pretty cool.