berettashotgun
Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2005
- Messages
- 1,149
Just sitting here wondering the drawbacks to the excellent intermediate (plus) rounds already available.
How come we received the 6.8 ?
A 6x45 sounds better all the time price/performance wise, but those darned short barrels are reducing the zip on the bullets.
Have an FN-49 in 7x57 and it is a VERY pleasant round to shoot ; possibly the rifle has something to do with this.FN-49's ARE sweet.
Can't think of the name of a rifle chambered in 6.5x55, but the Egyptian version is called the Hakim (?), again Very nice shooter. Lungeman, possibly...
Anybody have a plausible reason these rounds are NOT in some sort of use?
Surely someone can come up with a very similar performance round that has all the attributes of these legendary rounds.
Thinking it out, I'd take an FAL in either of these calibers over a 7.62x51
Chambered in 6x45, the M4 might be the ticket as compared to the 6.8.
I don't know, just thinking......I might just unwrap that Oly Arms barrel (6x45) and put it in a flattop.
How come we received the 6.8 ?
A 6x45 sounds better all the time price/performance wise, but those darned short barrels are reducing the zip on the bullets.
Have an FN-49 in 7x57 and it is a VERY pleasant round to shoot ; possibly the rifle has something to do with this.FN-49's ARE sweet.
Can't think of the name of a rifle chambered in 6.5x55, but the Egyptian version is called the Hakim (?), again Very nice shooter. Lungeman, possibly...
Anybody have a plausible reason these rounds are NOT in some sort of use?
Surely someone can come up with a very similar performance round that has all the attributes of these legendary rounds.
Thinking it out, I'd take an FAL in either of these calibers over a 7.62x51
Chambered in 6x45, the M4 might be the ticket as compared to the 6.8.
I don't know, just thinking......I might just unwrap that Oly Arms barrel (6x45) and put it in a flattop.