Apocalypse-Now
Member
that sucks. it is the seller's decision though. a lot of them are probably worried about violating some bizarre California anti gun law. i probably would be.
If you can state one instance of a rape victim offering a condom to a rapist with a positive result, I will re-consider your argument.that's like not selling condoms to a rape victim.
Kel-Tec (as I understand it) chooses not to sell any firearms in California as a protest to the stupid and restrictive gun laws here. They can do what they want but who are they hurting? The state government? The state-gov couldn't care less and would chalk this up as a victory. No, they are hurting law abiding gun owners by their idiotic political stance. Kel-Tec stands to gain far more if they stand behind us and help us to take advantage of their fine products. They could use our support and we could use theres. Guess where Kel-Tec resides on my preferred supplier list.
So go ahead and not sell to me. You are only burning yourselves at the stake if I have anything to say about it.
^^^ This is the appropriate reasoning. I wouldn't bother with the headaches either but it would have nothing to do with those unfortunate folks who live in those states.The wording he uses is condescending, but I have to agree with the sentiment. I wouldn't sell firearm accessories to California (or a half dozen other states) either, just because I don't want to get caught up in the web of legal issues it presents. Something as innocuous as a magazine or a folding stock or even a scope could violate some California law. Do they charge me with some arcane postal regulation about transferring prohibited items? Am I expected to refund the money to the buyer if it's confiscated? Who needs that kind of headache?
Having lived in CT (18 years), CA (20 years) and IL (a mere 3 years), yes, I am going to blame the victims.
The people of your states are actively and/or passively supporting statism.
If you don't like that, work from within to change it.
If you can state one instance of a rape victim offering a condom to a rapist with a positive result, I will re-consider your argument.
Until then, I will dismiss it as idiotic rhetoric.
Subscribing, and holding my breath.
Not.
You should file a civil suit against this guy, before long he and others will get the idea that they do as they please with their property(with sarcasm). Face it fellow you live in world that the rest of us know will be the model for the rest of our country and there are some of us that don't like the way things are going in California so move or change the laws if you wish to be treated the same.
+1 for learning from history. That is exactly what is happening in California. And it's a crying shame."We hate the totalitarian British monarchy, so we refuse to send aid, including arms and ammunition, to the Colonies in their struggle against that totalitarian monarch."