Certaindeaf
member
You can say that again.
Actually, the reason I put the quote by Tim Sundles, i.e. the "Buffalo Bore guy," is to show a deep contrast to the absurd bear management philosophies of the last few decades. In Anchorage, Rick Sinnott is punishing PEOPLE for bear encounters by issuing garbage fines instead of doing something about the out of control bear population in and around the Anchorage area.Alaska 444 and Skidder are right. Anyone planning on carrying spray needs to buy a second canister or use an older one about to expire for testing. While it may be sensed by someone 70-100 feet away, it won't have a serious effect on a bear.
I don't know why you'd want to use the spray on a bear that far away anyways. Usually when i see a bear, We don't notice each other until we're about that range apart and neither want to get closer. Panicly shooting the spray (or firearm) at that range is irresponsible and stupid as you'd end up with an empty canister and likely as much pepper in your eyes and respiratory system as the bear. The bear is probably just going about their day. Or if it is aggressive, wait till it's 10 meters so it can get a real strong dose. Of course there are exceptions like if a bruin is repeatedly harassing a camp, then that long gun may be in order.
Still, when I read the Buffalo Bore owners's comments, I got the sense that he's a little out of touch with the wild. Maybe the only times he gets out are to hunt so his impression of bear encounters are a bit skewed towards the "life or death" frame of mind. If we all behaved as the ammo company owner suggests, that of dispatching any bear that doesn't immediately run away, our wilderness will lose a great deal. That's another reason to prefer using spray; which will also deter aggressive bear behavior. Wonderful if momma bear has a spicy experience with humans and then teaches her cubs to not charge other humans.
Having an itchy trigger finger just isn't necessary with the right bear sense.
Outrage builds in Anchorage after bear attacks
Thomas Wood, a longtime Eagle River resident, said Anchorage's approach to bear management is "nonsense."
"They should shoot all the bears in town," he said. "Now they are coddling the bears so people are getting hurt. It is so stupid. The inmates are running the asylum."
Sinnott is not going to abandon old themes.
"I am still going to hammer on people about garbage this year," he said.
Last year, the city replaced more than 20 municipal trash containers in municipal parks with bear-resistant cans. This summer, the city plans to replace industrial trash bins with bear-resistant cans in areas where there are restaurants and apartment complexes.
For the first time, people who improperly dispose of their trash will be fined instead of being issued warnings. Fines for a first offense range from $50 to $300, up to $600 for a second offense.
I agree on the .44 magnum, but this is the lady I want backing me up!!I would bring my largest handgun, 44 magnum at least and this lady
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/black-bear-vs-angry-woman-defending-her-back-porch-guess-who-wins/
Bear attacks man and dog; wife attacks bear; all survive
According to WHTM and other media reports, the brawl began at about 3 a.m. Monday as Richard Moyer heard the pet dog, a pit bull/husky mix, barking outside. He opened the door to let the dog inside, and the bear followed. Thus began a battle that brought Angela Moyer rushing into the living room to find out what was happening.
She found her 6-foot-6, 300-pound husband on the floor, being attacked by the animal. "The bear was on him. Our dog was in the mix with them. I was like, 'This is crazy.' I just reacted," she said. "There was nothing really going through my mind other than 'Oh, my God, we got to get this bear out of here.'"
Whatever Angela Moyer did, it worked, because the bear swung around and headed for the door. But it knocked her over on the way. She ended up on the outdoor patio. Richard Moyer, despite cuts to his head, face and arms, staggered outside to find the animal attacking his wife, and he threw himself back into the fray. At that point the bear began tearing into his head.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nat...e-attacks-bear-all-live-to-tell-the-tale.html
but this is the lady I want backing me up!!
Today, the F&G of Anchorage and surrounding areas is treating the city limits as if it was an outdoor zoo where the residents WANT to see bears and moose and other wildlife inside the city limits. That is complete lunacy.
The two legged critters are almost always more dangerous, but not living in Anchorage any longer, all I have to go by is what is reported. Sorry, it sounds crazy to me to have grizzly bear inside the city limits and yes, there have been quite a few attacks the last decade.Oh it's not that crazy. I rather like the wildlife right here. It makes life more interesting. There needs to be a balance, as in all things. So long as the brownies are minding their own business they do well enough. It's their territory too. And mostly they're peaceable. And the moose pose no serious threat to anyone. It's best to keep things in perspective. Even in bad years Anchorage DRIVERS are exponentially more lethal than our wildlife! They're terrifyingly bad.
Just saying, it sound crazy to not only allow, but promote that kind of potentially dangerous wildlife within the city limits. I believe it is just asking for trouble allowing them to become tolerant of man and habituated.
Fair enough, can't argue with that.But they give us an excuse to carry around large rifles and handguns!
Dear AKMtnRunner,In response to Alaska444's comments on the Rick Sinnott and the bear's getting into trash, it comes squarely down to responsible behavior if you live on the edge of town. Sinnott was issuing citations for people putting their overflowing trash cans out on the road a day or more before it was scheduled to be picked up. Of course that is going to attract bear activity. What bear is not going to check out the smell of yesterday's grilled salmon? That's sort of a survival skill of bears that can not be naturally selected out. Is it too much to expect the most affluent demographic part of the city, who can afford to live anywhere but choose to live on the border with the State Park, to put their trash out on the right day?
I'm not a F&G scientist, nor one that is heavily involved with wildlife management enough to have a strong opinion on the matter, but I can say this: there is no substitute for good bear sense nor responsible behavior. I prefer to expect these two qualities of humans before endorsing eliminating bears. Perhaps one day we will move to authorize open hunting on bears (and the crazy moose population across ALL of Anchorage) and maybe that is the solution. I don't know. All I do know is that we can go a long ways to prevent ill encounters before making a decision like that.
Some folks practice and prefer rifle to bear spray. Actually, DLP studies may support this approach just as much as the pepper spray studies support that approach.you claim that you can grab a rifle out of a scabbard, lever out 4 hits at 20 yds in 1.5 seconds? I say that your watch stopped, bud, to be nice about it.
Dear Cosmoline,Rick has been retired for a few years, you know. And the people of Anchorage decide how to address wildlife here. So I'm not really seeing why this is such a big deal. It's just another way of approaching the matter, and it actually works pretty well. I'm also not sure where you got the idea there were only 10 bear hunts allowed in the Chugach. Hunting is more restricted in the GMU subparts near Anchorage's built-up area in the main part of the state park, but that's not really viable hunting area anyway. Far too many people are running around in there for safety. If you want Chugach bears in GMU 14 you just go a little bit further out and you're free to harvest one brown every few years and one black every year with no closed season in some cases:
http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=huntingmaps.bygmu&gmu=14
And go further out into the mountains into neighboring GMU's and they get more generous. To say the bear in the area aren't hunted is simply incorrect. The reason they keep coming is because the wilderness is a bear factory and their food sources--salmon and moose--are in the city. As long as garbage bears and their enablers are dealt with and the people use common sense, there's not much of an issue.
Is bear population growing in Anchorage, Alaska?
Rick Sinnott | Aug 22, 2012
The number of bears killed in recent years is too high to sustain, based on existing population estimates. Shooting more bears than the number that can be replaced by reproduction or immigration means that local bear populations could be decreasing instead of increasing. Yet some people are adamant that the Anchorage bear population is increasing every year. Just like the mosquitoes.
by AKgasman | August 22, 2012 - 12:23pm
Agressive bears should hunted down and shot!
by AKgasman | August 22, 2012 - 12:21pm
Read Sinntt's claftrap before did not need to read it again. Any Time they close a trail because of bears we have too many bears. just Old timer who can remember back when Anchorage did not not have any bears.or moose.We ate them all. A child could wander any where in the Anchorage bowel with out a problem.
I agree, aggressive bears should be shot.