Beretta CX-4 Storm

[Dbl0Kevin]

ROAshooter:

A review of Pats past posts.,,,,,show a distinctive "obsessive-compulsive" need to "correct-disagree-show contempt- for the topic at hand.

355sigfan:

Sub guns are better supressed in general I agree

That being said I personally enjoyed the conversation and found it very informative. I think the posting of the articles was in response to the article I mentioned that I read. If you don't want to read the long articles no one is making you. Last time I checked backing up something you believe in with a good number of facts is a good thing. I found the articles posted to be informative and did not think that the tone of any post was combative or holier than thou as you seem to be implying.

That's my .02 YMMV.

 

[Warner]

Pardon all, for brief my OT here.

ROA shooter said:
“His desire to "debate" a topic......will typically degenerate into a lecture..........complete with pages......and I mean PAGES of facts that he feels necessary to justify his position.â€

“Pat has gone to extremes to "point" out how much he dislikes this platform.......as he has done in such great depth in the past!! To which I obviously find extremely "TEDIOUS"!!!!!!!!!!!â€

A suggestion.
With such a demanding set of needs, wants and desires, starting up a new forum might be the way to go. This new forum could then be chock full of politically correct, feel-good advice for those that can’t fully handle the facts as they are, and presented in a way that accommodates shorter attention spans.

But alas, I guess there is still no real way to prevent some of those “been there – done that†folks from occassionally stopping by the new place to gore someone’s Royal Ox ...... when necessary.


ROA shooter said:
“A review of Pats past posts.,,,,,show a …….. contempt- for the topic at hand.â€

Still no foul here, 'cause it’s my belief that some things actually are contemptible.