You don't get one you build one. I am sure Mr. Morris would provide a schematic and the part numbers he used if someone ask.I’ll be darn,
Might have to get me one.
Thank you
J
You don't get one you build one. I am sure Mr. Morris would provide a schematic and the part numbers he used if someone ask.
Ron
IndeedThanks for sharing it again in case anyone wants to build their own trickler. Can be adapted to about any beam scale used for powder.
Thanks
Ron
I've ordered some check weights to verify consistency, so, time will tell.
To me for reloading, accuracy of .1 gr resolution of beam scales was good enough to load consistent rounds, even for record setting match shooting and 1000 yard Palma matches for decades.How do you verify the accuracy of the check weights ?
Unlike most "reloaders" aluminum check weights that go down to .5 gr, hopefully my Ohaus stainless steel check weights that go down to 1 mg (.015 gr) will oxidize slower.Perhaps they will oxidize over time and weigh less then.
The link to the 12v DPDT relay seems problematic.
I cannot endorse use of bullets as check weights as most jacketed bullets can vary around 1.0 gr. Even more consistent match grade bullets (Hornady HAP, Montana Gold, Zero, etc.) can vary by 1.0 gr. Even "ELEY match grade" RMR in-house jacketed bullets can vary by 0.5 gr.Store bought check weights aren’t necessarily exact.You can create your own using a bullet or a coated business card or both just write the number on it and save etc. it really doesn’t matter as long as your scale repeats, trust me on this one fellas
For many popular powders, 0.5 gr is the full range load data from start to max charges.
I cannot endorse use of bullets as check weights as most jacketed bullets can vary around 1.0 gr. Even more consistent match grade bullets (Hornady HAP, Montana Gold, Zero, etc.) can vary by 1.0 gr. Even "ELEY match grade" RMR in-house jacketed bullets can vary by 0.5 gr.
For many popular powders, 0.5 gr is the full range load data from start to max charges. And simply relying on repeatability of scale is like relying on a clock that is 5 minutes off.
For me, scale accurately reading heavy objects like bullets and calibration weights is less significant than scale accurately reading lighter objects like powder charges around 4 - 6 gr and this can be verified using check weights in the same weight range.
Similarly, I recommend the use of known standards/gages for calipers with diameter same as bullets being used. Since measuring cylindrical objects could have different "feel" depending on the amount of pressure applied to caliper jaws, I prefer to use pin gages to check my calipers with my eyes closed so I can get more consistent feel/readings (as bullets and finished rounds are cylindrical) and improper use of calipers and worn calipers will result in inconsistent taper crimp measurements - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/measuring-crimp.860279/#post-11320703
You also want to use the same size pin gage as the items you are measuring as different parts of the caliper gears can wear at different spots. Since I mainly reload 9mm/40S&W/45ACP, I have .355"/.400"/.451" pin gages.[/QUOT
I just use the same bullet. As pictured the 20 gr check weight aren’t perfect they just repeat
I agree.Some “Windows” are even smaller than that, like .2 gn from start to max.I cannot endorse use of bullets as check weights as most jacketed bullets can vary around 1.0 gr. Even more consistent match grade bullets (Hornady HAP, Montana Gold, Zero, etc.) can vary by 1.0 gr. Even "ELEY match grade" RMR in-house jacketed bullets can vary by 0.5 gr ... For many popular powders, 0.5 gr is the full range load data from start to max charges.
I am sorry but I would not consider anything like paper fiber that could absorb ambient moisture as "check weights". I wonder if there is a single pharmacy that uses business card as their check weights?These are the check weights I use.
I have several others but these are my favorites.
Excellent and thank you very muchIt’s working for me, try this one.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/12V-DC-Coi...-HH62P-JQX-13F-With-Socket-Base-/401365890710
or just go search 12V DC Coil Power Relay LY2NJ DPDT 8 Pin HH62P JQX-13F With Socket Base.
I agree.
I am sorry but I would not consider anything like paper fiber that could absorb ambient moisture as "check weights".
And as to using heavy 89.6 gr bullet as check weight, it won't help me verify accuracy and repeatability of my scales when I am loading max powder charge of 4 - 6 grains. (When we discussed accuracy of calipers, many machinist type members pointed out the importance of verifying accuracy at the measurement range)
I still recommend aluminum check weights that can better duplicate the powder charges used and preferably stainless steel ASTM Class 6 check weights like Ohaus set from Zoro to verify my scales.[/QUOTE
Very Good ,
We I suppose will agree to the quest for accuracy in our scales. Results and methods do vary I see.
And then there are those who throw charges + or - .1
Shoot Small y’all
J
Since you are new to the forum, let me remind you that we have myth busted the notion of scale accuracy below .1 gr resolution of most beam scales with digital scales using higher .02 gr (and even .015 gr) resolution verified by check weights that went down to 1 mg (0.015 gr) - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...tal-scale-accuracy.759750/page-4#post-9591790We I suppose will agree to the quest for accuracy in our scales. Results and methods do vary I see.
That's swing of .2-.3 gr and for many powders with start/max range of .5 gr, you could be over max charge/pressure. If my powder measure is throwing with that much swing, I would factor in the upper swing drop weight to conduct my load development/powder work up. (Of course, this is with the understanding that the scale being used was verified with check weights in the powder charge range)And then there are those who throw charges + or - .1
I use 2 Ohaus 10-10 and RCBS 5-0-5 with .1 gr resolution for my reloading. (Lee Safety scale member rcmodel signed remains in the factory box along with other reloading equipment he sent before he died)I currently use a lee scoop and a Dandy Trickler in conjunction with my Scott parker tuned beam scale. It’s extremely accurate
Since you are new to the forum, let me remind you that we have myth busted the notion of scale accuracy below .1 gr resolution of most beam scales with digital scales using higher .02 gr (and even .015 gr) resolution verified by check weights that went down to 1 mg (0.015 gr) - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...tal-scale-accuracy.759750/page-4#post-9591790
.1 gr resolution beam scales have been successfully used to load consistent rounds over the decades, win and set match records, even for 1000 yard Palma matches. And I believe .1 gr resolution is good enough for reloading and we probably don't need .02 gr resolution.
But for us to verify that our scales are accurate to .1 gr, we need standards/check weights to do that.
But not with paper business card.