Evergreen
Member
OH yeah, I want to clarify for those who may have misunderstood me. This is NOT my FIRST gun or first AR. I already own a ROck River Entry Tactical Carbine A4, as well as Saiga 308 and a DPMS LR-308.
I am just looking for what can be considered a fun gun, battle gun, SHTF gun, etc etc. I like to get something nice and tacticoolish that is of high quality to add to my collection. Since I do own an AR-10 and AR-15, a gas piston gun like XCR or SIg 556, might give the collection some diversity, I kind of like that. However, a real nice high quality AR that is beefed up and outperforms a gas piston gun would be my preference over an inferior gas piston gun.
Still I am wondering about XCR 7.62 x 39. Is it true XCR's have interchangeable barrels? That seems like a real unique feature that may be interesting. As far as XCR quality, I hear lot of good, but a few gripes. Not sure how it holds it own against LMT MPR, NOveske.
And of course I hear Gas piston system is not long term battle tested. However, from what I hear gas piston AR's seem to outlast DI AR's in torture tests, but that evidence is not conclusive or significant for most situations.
Well, I respect your belief, but I think AR's and automobile have one thing in common, they are mechanical structures with moving and interchageable parts and, although they do all have the same function, the quality from one manufacturer and brand to another does seem some variances in quality. For example, I will take a Subaru Outback anyday of the week over a Ford Sedan because of the endless problems I had with my Fords and the huge mechanic bills I ended up incurring. Thats not to say, that a Ford won't work for you, but it just seems the engineering of the car has some major flaws which were more prevalent over time. My Subaru I owned for many years and have yet to do any major repair job on it. Well, I think I can apply this same logic to AR guns, as well. Sorry, lets not ignite a Japanese vs American car debate here ..
I got ammo, I got Nightforce for my .308, an Aimpoint for my ROck River and an ACOG that is crying and lonely for a new home . For now the Acog is on the Rock River along with the Aimpoint, but I need another AR to put that sight on.
SO, Since I got ammo and optics, now I like a nice gun to add to the family. Since, I am familiar with AR platform and have lot of mags, ammo , optics for it.. I thought an AR platform, where I Can share the parts would be an advantage.
Did I forget to mention about my interest in the XCR 7.62 x 39 though.. ahh.. I know.. Not practical, right? Perhaps going to a new caliber is a pain, but if that gun could handle wolf ammo ok without damaging the gun I'd be intersted to know.
Is it a crime to have an additional AR? Also, I have heard from a few sources Rock Rivers are inferior and not Mil-Spec. Not that I think its a bad gun. Iam happy to own it and maybe it has some qualities that a Colt, LMT or other mil-spec gun doesn't have, I am not sure. I own it, so I am not planning on ditching it anytime soon.
I am just looking for what can be considered a fun gun, battle gun, SHTF gun, etc etc. I like to get something nice and tacticoolish that is of high quality to add to my collection. Since I do own an AR-10 and AR-15, a gas piston gun like XCR or SIg 556, might give the collection some diversity, I kind of like that. However, a real nice high quality AR that is beefed up and outperforms a gas piston gun would be my preference over an inferior gas piston gun.
Still I am wondering about XCR 7.62 x 39. Is it true XCR's have interchangeable barrels? That seems like a real unique feature that may be interesting. As far as XCR quality, I hear lot of good, but a few gripes. Not sure how it holds it own against LMT MPR, NOveske.
And of course I hear Gas piston system is not long term battle tested. However, from what I hear gas piston AR's seem to outlast DI AR's in torture tests, but that evidence is not conclusive or significant for most situations.
Decide for yourself, dont listen to brand snobs, dont listen to the claims of those who will tell you that only certain brands will hold up to being fired more than a few hundred rds. Dont listen to those who will tell you that certain brands (aside from Vulcan ARs) will not hold up to carbine or rifle courses. I think most who will tell you those stories have never been to a carbine course, or have ever owned an AR.
I do think LMT makes a good rifle, Bushmaster, and many many others. You could also build a rifle from parts, then you know exactly what went into it.
Well, I respect your belief, but I think AR's and automobile have one thing in common, they are mechanical structures with moving and interchageable parts and, although they do all have the same function, the quality from one manufacturer and brand to another does seem some variances in quality. For example, I will take a Subaru Outback anyday of the week over a Ford Sedan because of the endless problems I had with my Fords and the huge mechanic bills I ended up incurring. Thats not to say, that a Ford won't work for you, but it just seems the engineering of the car has some major flaws which were more prevalent over time. My Subaru I owned for many years and have yet to do any major repair job on it. Well, I think I can apply this same logic to AR guns, as well. Sorry, lets not ignite a Japanese vs American car debate here ..
OP, Other = CMMG and the extra $800 is for a good scope ~$400, 10 pmags ~$150, gun case ~$50 and ~200 of Ammo!.
I got ammo, I got Nightforce for my .308, an Aimpoint for my ROck River and an ACOG that is crying and lonely for a new home . For now the Acog is on the Rock River along with the Aimpoint, but I need another AR to put that sight on.
SO, Since I got ammo and optics, now I like a nice gun to add to the family. Since, I am familiar with AR platform and have lot of mags, ammo , optics for it.. I thought an AR platform, where I Can share the parts would be an advantage.
Did I forget to mention about my interest in the XCR 7.62 x 39 though.. ahh.. I know.. Not practical, right? Perhaps going to a new caliber is a pain, but if that gun could handle wolf ammo ok without damaging the gun I'd be intersted to know.
Is it a crime to have an additional AR? Also, I have heard from a few sources Rock Rivers are inferior and not Mil-Spec. Not that I think its a bad gun. Iam happy to own it and maybe it has some qualities that a Colt, LMT or other mil-spec gun doesn't have, I am not sure. I own it, so I am not planning on ditching it anytime soon.
Last edited: