I tried to not answer and let the thread die; but there are just some people that continue to ask questions. ESPECIALLY questions that have already been answered. Sammy; you obviously have not read this post very closely. But to answer your question anyway; ANY, let me repeat, ANY rule/policy/etc... that a property owner makes; MUST, let me repeat, MUST apply to ALL PATRONS. As such; it can not go against any existing laws such as; NO BLACKS, NO GAYS, NO HANDICAPPED, etc... Again, it must apply to everyone. The ONLY exception to this, that has been upheld in court (Albeit locally), are policies that concern safety or existing state/federal laws. I.e. No One Under the age of 21 years old .......; or You Must be at least 42" tall to go on this ride...... But other than that, the property owner (In the case of a business) can not make a rule/policy/etc... that doesn't apply to ALL PATRONS.
But to answer your deeper meaning question: If the property owner had a rule/policy that applied to EVERYONE; then NO, I would NOT ignore it. If I couldn't agree or live with the rule, I simply wouldn't go on/into their property.
And in the interest of letting this thread DIE; I hope it does; let me clarify and say again. I personally believe that a NO FIREARMS ALLOWED sign is totally illogical and stupid. A business owner has absolutely no logical reason for having one, IF IT INCLUDES CONCEALED CARRY. Bad guys will not respect the rules and it only keeps law abiding folks from having a means of self defense. And if the local/state/federal government can trust the carrier enough to issue a concealed weapons permit; then so should the property owner. However; if they wanted to deny OPEN CARRY; I can understand the logic in that. There are some people/customers that would be uncomfortable with seeing an open gun. Therefor, in the spirit of making all customers comfortable, I could see not allowing open carry. Concealed carry is totally illogical to deny. But I do believe that a private property owner has the right to be stupid and illogical. It's their property. If the rule is stupid; so be it. I just won't go on the property. But it is THEIR RIGHT. I don't have a right to go on their property. For me to go on the property, it's a privilege.