CZ Polymer Pistols (P07/P09) vs. steel/alloy CZs

Status
Not open for further replies.

SKILCZ

Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
496
Having read about some issues with early polymer CZs, has CZ fixed the issues with polymer pistols with the P-07 & P-09? Has anyone had one long enough to test its longevity & durability--especially the polymer components? Have any of the more experienced CZ guys tried the new polymer CZ pistols, and, if so, how do they compare to the alloy & steel framed guns in terms of ergonomics, accuracy, recoil, durability, trigger, etc.?

I'm told they don't have magazine compatibility with the metal guns.
 
...especially the polymer components?

There aren't many polymer components -- just the frame -- and it's similar to the Glock line in that respect.

The ONLY reak problems I ever heard about in the early models was a bulging frame near/above the grip. The bulge didn't look right, but the gun continued to function properly. That was fixed with a different (internal) frame design and, possibly, a slight change in the polymer formula. I've not heard about any other problems -- and it's been several years, now. Cajun Gun Works, a great source of CZ upgrades, is now supporting the P-07 and P-09. If you get one you'll want to check out that site.

(The polymer-framed version of the RAMI, which is a different design, apparently had a similar frame bulge. The bulge was disconcerting for some owner and an eyesore but, the gun functioned properly. That version of the RAMI was discontinued.)

The new P-07 and P-09 seem to be good guns, and I'll probably pick one up one of these days. I have no experience with the Omega trigger system and I want to explore that hands on. I usually trade my way into guns that I want, but I've gotten to the point where the ones I have I want to keep -- so it may be a while.

If you want to know what experienced CZ owners think of the gun, you ought to visit the CZ Forum: www.czfirearms.us/
 
Last edited:
As Walt said, the only CZ problems I have heard of were the early 07 models. The current 07 model is a new design, similar to the new 09.

I have an 09 and it is probably the most accurate CZ I have owned so far. I am looking at getting a new style 07 in the near future.

To me, the trigger was better out if the box than my alloy framed CZ's, but still room for improvement. It will get some CGW parts down the road.

The biggest advantage I see to the poly guns are the weight.
 
CZ P-07 an early CZ poly frame gun?

Hang on, let me dig out my CZ-100 so we can all weep over that tragedy again.... and show my age a bit. The CZ-100 was so cool that it was even featured in the animated movie "Ghost in the Shell". Too bad it was a steaming pile of... well, unpleasantness. One of the few guns I've ever owned that physically abused it's owner.

As for the newer poly frame CZs, the phantom is an absolute masterwork, too bad it was discontinued and the SP-01 magazines are so expensive. Magazine cost may finally end it's use in IPDA matches. What a tragedy that will be.

The RAMI P is a wonderful gun. Surprisingly light recoil for it's size. Mags won't drop free no matter what you do though. It finally got shelved after years of daily carry in favor of a shield. Sorry RAMI, it was fun while it lasted.

P-07... Great gun. I really, really want to love it, but as usual CZ product accessories kind of kill it. Good luck finding a duty quality holster for CZs "Duty" line of pistols. And the de-cocker is backwards.. which is kind of okay because you can swap it out for a safety that is too flat to ever actually use. To top it off, if you have meaty paws, a quick mag change can be real painful as part of your hand gets pinched between the magazine floor plate and the bottom of the grip. I really want to love this little poly CZ, but it stays on the shelf. Shoots great on the range, falls sadly short in the other aspects of a guns life. Seriously, the factory tritium sights are plastic. PLASTIC? CZ, ***?
 
Got any pics of them with the CZ? I think I might order a P-07, unless something else comes along.....
 
ClickClickD'oh said:
CZ P-07 an early CZ poly frame gun?

I don't think anyone made THAT claim. Several of us talked about early P-07 models -- which isn't the same thing.

(I didn't mention the CZ-100 -- I had a 9mm and .40 version, and came to hate them both.)

Most of your criticisms would also apply to most relatively new guns, or to guns not yet sold in high numbers. (If there's only a relative few out there, accessory makers aren't going to bother making parts until there's a market) The problem you had with pinching your hand could happen with other compact guns.

As for holsters: I had similar problems trying to find a holster for a SIG GSR when they first came out -- as that accessory rail made things difficult. I had similar problems finding a holster for a Steyr.

You'll run into that kind of problem if all you do is search on line. But if you take the gun with you to a gun show or a gun shop, you'll likely find a holster that fits well. In a couple of cases, I found holsters that fit like they were made for the gun: example, a SIG P228 holster that fit a S&W 669, or when I got my first CZ-75B, the Beretta 92 holster.

I haven't handled a P-07 or P-09 yet, so had not heard or experienced a "decocker" working backwards. That is awkward -- but not critical. The only time you use the decocker is when you're through shooting, and that awkwardness it just means a second try until you learn to do it right. I'd prefer a safety, anyhow, and if THAT is hard to use, I'll find a replacement part (probably from Cajun Gun Works in the near future.)

Question: Are your sights true night sights, or do they just have that luminescent paint that CZ has always put on their guns? (Factory night sights on other CZs are typically Trijicon sights, and they have a metal base -- but may have a covering over the metal.

If you're THAT dissatisfied with the P-07 maybe we can work out a trade... (or make me an offer by PM.)
 
Walt Sherrill said:
I don't think anyone made THAT claim.

Hey now, don't go ruining my old fogey fun.

Walt Sherrill said:
As for holsters:

Oh, I've found holsters that kind of fit, and a few companies that make specific P-07 holsters now. I need something with a little more.... retention.

Oh, wait... hang on... I see that Safariland just released the 6360 for the P-07... this could be a game changer. Now if we can just convince them to add the 6378 to the line for off duty wear...

Walt Sherrill said:
I haven't handled a P-07 or P-09 yet, so had not heard or experienced a "decocker" working backwards.

Oh, it's a special sort of fun. It tilts down at the front, not the rear, like every other CZ with a decocker. You really need to function it with your support hand. It's really a very odd choice on their part to implement it that way.

Walt Sherrill said:
Question: Are your sights true night sights, or do they just have that luminescent paint that CZ has always put on their guns?

Yup, honest to god, straight from CZ plastic tritium sights.

http://shop.cz-usa.com/ProductDetail/19713_Night-Sights-P07-Duty-3--6mm-Plastic

*EDIT*

LOL, I see that the plastic ones are discontinued and the new ones are metal. That's what I get for getting in early.
 
Oh, it's a special sort of fun. It tilts down at the front, not the rear, like every other CZ with a decocker. You really need to function it with your support hand. It's really a very odd choice on their part to implement it that way.

Not every other CZ with a decocker. You're been exposed to the new Omega system, which lets the user switch from safety to decocker, or vice versa. I suspect that mechanism has to work a bit differently to allow the functional interchangeability while using just one opening in the frame for the lever to pivot through.

That WOULD make it difficult to decock with the strong hand -- unless you have a hand like Kareem Abdul Jabbar... (and then you'd probably REALLY pinch your hand when changing mags.)
 
I have pics of my OWB holster. I don't have pics of my shoulder holster. The shoulder holster is a Miami Classic for the 4" XD.

68iMLlQ.jpg
 
I have a little bit of experience with the CZ Poly pistols and yes, including the CZ-100. I actually thought the CZ-100 trigger was't that bad until I shot it, and it was impossible for me to time the trigger to hit the paper consistently. On the other hand, I do have these...IGNORE THE CRASS COMMERCIALIZATION, it's the only video I have with both pistols at once and I'm out of shirts anyway. Mods, NOT trying to sell anything...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9u0gp2qgAM&list=UUanwe6BqjwvGZuZ1Vtn7NUQ

And after CGW worked the magic...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88LqvNBfttI&list=UUanwe6BqjwvGZuZ1Vtn7NUQ

No holsters?

P-09B2_zps6bcaa0b8.jpg

PhantomandDownUnderbrightlight2.jpg

Finalpic.jpg

HighNoonP07setup.jpg

http://highnoonholsters.com/

No holsters...sheesh...

This one rides with me to and from work every single day.

magazinead_zps2e42a3d0.jpg
 
Good to know that the Xd holster will work with the P07.

I've had my 07 since April. Shot about 1000 rounds through it, mostly in training classes. Have not had one single malfunction. I replaced the stock hammer spring with a reduced power competition spring and greatly reduced the DA trigger pull. I measured it with the reduced power hammer spring and got about 8.5 lb.

I like the 07's decocking lever as I prefer my first shot to be in DA mode. The 07 is lighter than the CZ 75B that I had. Both are reliable and accurate. I didn't like the thumb safety on the 75B as I can't reach it with my thumb and would rather not lower the hammer manually. I sold the 75B and now my 07 is my main carry gun, even my custom 1911s and the Walther PPQ are jealous.

For IWB I use a Winthrop holster:

IMG731.jpg

For OWB I use a Blade Tech Eclipse which I don't have a picture for.
 
In my opinion the P07 Duty is a very solid pistol in every respect. I think it would be quite hard to find a better polymer pistol. The P07 pistols are selling for a bargain price at Virginia Gun Shows. The trigger alone is probably worth the pistol price. It has the best trigger I've found straight from the factory, in plastic pistols.
 
My p-09's decocker works the same as my Sig p220 & 229 and Ruger P-89....thumb it down and the hammer falls. ??? Am I missing something???


While my 09 is only a few months old it's functioned perfectly for over 1500 rounds now which isn't much but there's hardly any wear on the barrel finish...if any.

I really like the new finish on the 07&09 also seems to be pretty darned tough compared to the paint like stuff on some of the 75's.


The 09 makes me want an 07 to go along with it....they're nice plastic pistols that's for sure. Great fit and finish all the way around.
 
ritepath said:
My p-09's decocker works the same as my Sig p220 & 229 and Ruger P-89....thumb it down and the hammer falls. ??? Am I missing something???

The P-07/P-09 decockers pivot differently than other CZ decockers--that's the point ClickClickD'oh was addressing/compaining(?) about.

With prior CZs decocker models, you also pushed the lever down to decock, but the part of the lever pushed "down" is at the rear of the lever, close to the thumb, and the bar to which the lever is attached (going into the frame) is at the front of the lever.

With the P-07, the tab you push down is at the front of the control lever and and the bar to which it's attached is at the rear, near the thumb. Down is still down, but it's a bit different. As you note, it's just ike a SIG or a Ruger P-95. Maybe ClickClickD'oh was just having a bad day -- or had only had SIG/Ruger decockers before getting the P-07.

My 3rd & 4th Ggeneation S&W semi-autos also had levers that pivoted from the rear, but those levers were on the slide, and you still pushed it down, but it generally wasn't done with the strong-hand thumb.
 
Last edited:
Walt Sherrill said:
Maybe ClickClickD'oh was just having a bad day -- or had only had SIG/Ruger decockers before getting the P-07.

If I had only had Sigs and Rugers before.... how would I know and or care the P-07 decocker is different from the rest of the CZ line? :)

My Phantom still gets almost daily work. (Thank you Blade Tech for the custom duty holster)

Of course, the Sig decocker doesn't really have the same action as the Ruger. The Sig is more of a straight down press where as the Ruger is a rotation. I'd say the Beretta decocker is more in line with the Ruger.

Wow, I'm way of on a side track, back on topic. The P-07 safety/decocker just seems like a case of "why did you mess with that?" Honestly, as useless as the flat plastic safety is, CZ should have just left it decocker only and made it done it better.
 
Much better.....the P-09 is the only CZ I own. I've only laid hands on a few 75's



Well this is a Plastic CZ p series Vs steel CZs
 
ClickClickD'oh said:
If I had only had Sigs and Rugers before.... how would I know and or care the P-07 decocker is different from the rest of the CZ line?

You're right -- I mistated the point I was trying to make and didn't state it clearly. Sorry. It was obvious you already knew that older CZs had one type of decocker and that the newer CZs another. That was what you were complaining about.

The part I got wrong was when I mentioned the SIGs and Rugers. What I should have written was that if you weren't having a bad day, perhaps you just had NOT seen other decocker styles that required you to press down on the front of the decocker lever to decock the weapon. The SIGs and Rugers worked in that manner, just like the new Omega-based CZs. (That's what I was thinking when I was keying, but that's not what my fingers put on your screen. My brain and my fingers were obviously not in synch, and I erred.

ClickClickD'oh said:
Of course, the Sig decocker doesn't really have the same action as the Ruger. The Sig is more of a straight down press where as the Ruger is a rotation. I'd say the Beretta decocker is more in line with the Ruger.

Inside these guns, all three decocker mechanisms (CZ P-07, SIG, and Ruger) work in quite different ways, but all three of the decocking processes are activated by LEVERS and they all move in a similar fashion: you push down on the front end of the lever to decock the weapon.; the lever is attached to or is part of a pivoting component. The "levering" action is the same. But, how the decocking process is achieved wasn't our topic -- the levers and how they worked was the topic. You were complaining about CZ doing it differently with the P-07 than they had with the older 75B-based, non-Omega system guns (causing you to press on the front rather than the rear of the mechanism).

The SIG decocker control is a lever; it's covered by the grip, and while you don't see the lever, it's there. Check a SIG parts diagram if you disagree -- the manual is available online. Or, if you have a SIG, just take off the left grip. The lever is longer and larger than you might expect. If you do take the grip off be careful that you don't knock the decocking lever spring loose. To decock the SIG, you push the front end of the lever DOWN. That you don't SEE a lever doesn't mean there's not one there, under the grip.

The Ruger control -- which they call the SAFETY in their parts list (But a decocker lever when they tell you how to decock the weapon in the user manual) is also a lever. The Ruger lever is shorter than the SIG or CZ levers and the metal on which it pivots is much thicker, but it's still a lever. It uses leverage to make the rotation easier. Yes -- it does rotate, but so do the levers used in the P-07 and SIGs.. The Ruger lever is on the slide, not the frame, but it's easier to decock the Ruger using the strong hand than is case with the slide-mounted decocker on the older S&Ws semi-autos I mentioned. To decock the Ruger you push the front end of the lever DOWN. It's a shorter piece, but it's still a lever.

To decock the P-07 or P-09, you push the front end of the lever DOWN.

Maybe you WERE having a bad day... I had one, too, and replied incorrectly -- but I've acknowledged my error and tried to correct it.


.
 
Last edited:
I don't need a full size gun, or I would get the 09. but for me, "retired" it is too large to walk around with, although a good house gun, The p01 is more of a carry.
 
Walt Sherrill said:
Maybe you WERE having a bad day... I had one, too, and replied incorrectly -- but I've acknowledged my error and tried to correct it.

I think what we have here is a case of you getting way too analytically on what I was saying. :rolleyes:

There's no dispute that decocking levers are in point of fact levers. I was commenting on how the levers are operated. Or, in pictures:

Old CZ style:

SP-01Decocker_zps9ff2893a.jpg

CZ P-07/P-09:

p-07decocker_zpscdd50881.jpg


Beretta, Ruger, 3rd gen Smith:

M92decocker_zps1408eac7.jpg

rugerdecocker_zpsd95cf5bc.jpg

smith3rdgen_zps61f040ba.jpg


Sig:

sigdecocker_zps892d1671.jpg

Don't worry, I have plenty of experience with the M9 and the 226 over the years. At some point or another I've been paid to wear both. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top