huntsman
Member
Is that the 100 round "value" pack? I found a bad one in a box(100) of 9mm, spent about a half hour cleaning the mag and going through each round before I loaded up another.
If you want high quality ammunition that you can depend on you MUST load your own because the factories just don't care any more. It's bad enough they produce, package and sell junk like this - and then won't even give you a refund on it. This kind of stuff has been going on for quite a few years now but it has obviously reached the point where these people need to find new jobs. Imagine if you were a U.S. soldier and you ripped open a box of ammo and found this? I have seen Winchester factory ammo with primers inserted sideways and backwards, no powder in the case and even cases with no flash hole punched in them.
"I'm guessing that soldiers don't use economy grade ammo". Soldiers have to use whatever they are issued - and most of that isn't even American made ammo anymore. If you had ever served in the military then you will know how the old "lowest bidder" thing works. It's all politics. Most of the small arms ammo used today by our military comes from Israel and South Korea - both countries located in very dangerous places - after our Govt. closed all of the U.S. Armories except for Lake City. Only a politician could come up with an idea that stupid.
If you aren't already aware of this, "Winchester" is just a name. It's a joke now. Like you said, Winchester hardly makes anything these days and they certainly don't make guns in America.
"I'm guessing that soldiers don't use economy grade ammo". Soldiers have to use whatever they are issued - and most of that isn't even American made ammo anymore. If you had ever served in the military then you will know how the old "lowest bidder" thing works. It's all politics. Most of the small arms ammo used today by our military comes from Israel and South Korea - both countries located in very dangerous places - after our Govt. closed all of the U.S. Armories except for Lake City. Only a politician could come up with an idea that stupid.
Their products are now all imported selling out American's jobs and their customer service is ran by incompetent bozos.
]
I contacted their product service rep, Sheryl Forbeck, who infomed me that they could not give me a FULL refund OR a cupon for a whole new box because I had already shot some of the ammo.
Here ya go Sheryl Forbeck. You just keep that $9.50.
Seems legitimate to me. $9.50 credit/refund for 7 rounds of bad ammo seems like good CS to me. The heavy marks on the FMJ bullets tells me it could very well be more than defective manufacture. I've shot bowling pins with FMJs that showed less deformation than that. As far as safety, would those rounds even chamber in your gun? I know they wouldn't in mine. WWB has always performed well for me considering the cost of it. While I reload most of my ammo nowadays, I still buy a few boxes every year for when others than me shoot my firearms. While 7 bad rounds outta a box of 100 would be a disappointment, getting $9.50 for them would not be. But that's me. I wonder if Winchester gave a full refund or free 100 round box every-time someone showed them a pic of one defective round, how many folks would whack a round or two from every box with a hammer for the freebies?
Regardless of how good the ammo is coming out of Israel or South Korea (and in my experience it is very good quality) the problem remains - both countries border other countries that would like to nuke them into the stone age. So where does our D.O.D. turn to if that happens? Do they simply tell the soldiers "Sorry guys, we cannot produce enough ammo for you all and our main supplier just went up in smoke". See a logistics problem there? This has been going on since the Clinton administration.
Elano, I understand your frustration, and I would have that frustration as well. But please consider removing the customer service reps name from your post. She did not make the policy, she only has to work within it to keep her job. It is not fair to her personally to place her name up in the post. If you want to put her first name, cool. But putting her first and last name up there is really not fair to her. Would you want you name posted on the internet for simply doing your job? I do realize that I will catch heat for this, and I would be upset with WInchester as well, but it is not her personal fault.