Nushif
Member
Yup.
That's the slope I was talking about. We went from someone who had views other than us to using a "shrink" and "getting people to think."
"Antis" are people too. People who don't like what we think. But there's no point to assume simply because someone who doesn't agree with our point of view when it comes to personal defense "doesn't think."
This whole "facts" and "start to think" rhetoric is just as misguided as "assault weapons."
"How to talk to an anti" ... it's not like they're a foreign species. They're people too. And you talk to them with respect and so they maintain their dignity.
The article also has really good advice on how to talk to an anti, and maybe get them to think.
That's the slope I was talking about. We went from someone who had views other than us to using a "shrink" and "getting people to think."
"Antis" are people too. People who don't like what we think. But there's no point to assume simply because someone who doesn't agree with our point of view when it comes to personal defense "doesn't think."
This whole "facts" and "start to think" rhetoric is just as misguided as "assault weapons."
"How to talk to an anti" ... it's not like they're a foreign species. They're people too. And you talk to them with respect and so they maintain their dignity.
Last edited: