Encounter with LEO's while carrying concealed..

Status
Not open for further replies.
I took the Massad Ayoob approach once (exit & lock vehicle leaving weapon inside in plain view, skirting the terry search of grabbable area and maintaining officer safety and citizen safety). It worked but did not go over very well. She drew down on me and told me to get back in the vehicle, which I did not do. I slowly approached her with both hands visible asking what she wanted. She said she wanted me to get back in the vehicle. I said you must want to talk to me about something because you pulled me over so here I am.

She wanted to search the vehicle (denied), she wanted to retreive my "papers" from the glovebox (denied), she wouldn't let me retrieve the papers myself and got snotty and said she was going to write me up for no insurance, registration and emissions. I told her that all she had to do is run the plate and see that it would come back to my wife's name, and that the emissions sticker is on the windshield. Then she found a FTA for a traffic ticket on me so I suggested that perhaps this is a good time to declare my weapon to her. She said it's ok where its at and to leave it there. I suggested that since it was in plain view on the seat that it was not a good idea to leave it there cause it was very visible and prone to theft. Then she wanted to take the weapon into custody and I could go through the courts to get it back? I suggested she call my wife to come take the vehicle and secure the weapon to which she got very snotty and said something to the effect of "I'm not a public telephone service" to which I suggestethat since my wife was at home just a few blocks away that if she left the car & weapon there that I would consider that to be bad judgement on her part and unreasonable since it was a simple phone call and she did have a cell phone. If she wouldn't do that and the weapon was stolen that it would largely be her fault for being unreasonable on her part. She snatched the phone up.

At no time was I snotty or non polite. Very matter of fact and I believe I handled it very well and she was offended at my failure to roll over like a sheep, unquestioningly. I do not have a CCW permit and thought it was sound advice from Ayoob to be seperate from the weapon at the moment it was declared. Dunno how I could've handled it better and still retain some semblance of rights. But it still caused her to become PO'd. Emotionalism from a cop is very non professional.
 
Another time I was pulled over for speeding and my GM was on the dash of my pickup. I kept both hands dangling out the window and declared it immediately when they approached. They took me out of the truck and one of them went to the truck and retrieved it and came back asking why I carried it cocked, while pulling it out of the holster. I told him that if he's unfamilier with the weapon design that he would do good to not mess with it and maybe AD it. This man was a thinking man and did wisely put it back into the holster and snapped it back. I took my ticket and they put the weapon in the rear bed and told me not to retrieve it until they were gone.

I respect those guys. They took no offense at my words, treated me with respect and I returned the same.
 
Speaking as a Officer if someone told me they had one I would ask to see it. I then may even ask what he was carrying out of interest. Their would be no proning out or anything like that. I see no reason to hassle someone over what the have lawfully attained.

If you are carrying and it is visible then common sense would be to say something as the officer approached. Again as long as the CCW was good I would be fine with that. I wish there were more armed citizens. Oh and because someone told me, more then likely I would give them a break for whatever was my reason for contact in appreciation for their honesty.
 
Wow, Edward! Sounds like treading on pretty thin ice to me!

No matter how polite you were, I would assume there was some reason that you were pulled over in the first place. I'm not an LEO, but I do know from experience that they do NOT like it when a person they have just pulled over jumps out of the car and approaches them!

I think that if I were in her shoes, I would pretty quickly make the assumption that you are hiding something, and likely something serious enough that you didn't want her to see it. That would make me even more suspicious......

Just my $0.02!
 
Does the LEO really believe that a CCW holder is going to come out blazing after he already voluntarily pulled over for a minor traffic violation? Sounds paranoid to me.

where in most cases what you say is true......but just because someone pulls over does not mean tht that person is not a threat. but look at this the way a LEO would.

when he/she pulls someone over they will record the stop with dispatch, then walk to the car. at this point the LEO dosent know who you are or what you a going to do.

Unless what you are saying is that after he has your DL and finds out you have a CCW and freaks out Then I would have to agree
 
I got caught speeding twice in the last 18 months (didn't realize what the limit was). Was carrying both times.

I said nothing about my CPL or carrying. Officers didn't ask. I signed for the deserved ticket and went about my way.

2nd time was carrying in a fanny pack. The trooper didn't say anything about it, but did drop the speed noted on the ticket to 5 over.

I'm a fan of don't tell, don't show, and don't give the officer a reason to be concerned. I'll answer only the questions asked (within reason).
 
"You're a young guy driving a new Hummer". My immediate response would be, "So you pulled me over for no reason other than my apparent age? Does the term Age Discrimination come to mind?" That flatfoot apparently has never heard a young buck who works for a living and make more money that he does.
 
I had a friend who was a cop tell me what he would do if he had someone pulled over and their license came up flagged for CCW but they hadn't mentioned anything. He said he would draw down on the car, have the occupant exit the vehicle, lay on the ground, etc. etc. and make sure there was no gun.

If he's concerned about people he's got pulled over having guns and not declaring them, he'd better start felony stopping everyone he pulls over. Goes back to the whole concept of criminals breaking the law because they're criminals and not worrying about the 'legal' way to carry.


-Teuf
 
No matter how polite you were, I would assume there was some reason that you were pulled over in the first place. I'm not an LEO, but I do know from experience that they do NOT like it when a person they have just pulled over jumps out of the car and approaches them!

It's been awhile but it was something really minor. License plate light out or something like that. She was just fishing for an easy what can I find. You don't have to be a criminal to not want to be searched. Just because I didn't want to be searched doesn't mean that I had something criminal to hide.

I did not 'jump out and approach her' either. I came out real slow (and the yelling started and the gun came out) and walked around the front of my vehicle and then down the sidewalk towards her with my hands clearly visible half raised. Very non threatening.
 
Speaking as a Officer if someone told me they had one I would ask to see it.
I never understood why an officer would ask to have the weapon removed from the holster. To me this creates a public safety problem.

I do not like handling loaded weapons unnecessarily. I load my pistol and put it in the holster. If it comes out, I'm either unloading it or firing it. There is also something extremely unnerving about handing somebody a loaded weapon. It goes against everything I was ever taught about gun safety since I was a child. Finally, there is no safe direction to point a loaded pistol when sitting in a vehicle on the side of the highway so most likely you will have to violate rule #2.

All in all a very unsafe situation. It's better to leave leave it in the holster and ask to see the hands instead.

In NC, declaration is required. I have no problem with that (they know anyway) as long as the gun stays safely where it is.
 
I don't believe that Colorado requires one to tell a police officer you're CCWing, but I've heard too many stories of CCW holders getting out of tickets once the cop knows they are one of the "good guys" (much like fellow LEOs get out of tickets) so I'd tell even though I'm not required. :neener:
 
One small point, and one question...

Here in AZ, you must declare that you're carrying when stopped by a LEO. It sounds smart to me, anyhow, but that's JMO. However, I think it does make a difference in how you tell the LEO you're carrying

Version 1: "I'm carrying a gun and I have a CCW for it."
Version 2: "I have a permit for a concealed gun, and it's located IWB at 4 o'clock."

In the first version, the officer might not get past "I have a gun", before all hell breaks loose. Use version 2, or words to that effect.

Question for LEOs or whoever else has experience here: What does one do as a passenger in a car that's been stopped by a LEO? Announce up front as in version 2 above? Say nothing because nothing is required?
 
As a former and glad to be retired LEO, I can tell you what my feelings on CCW are. If a person that I stop has a CCW, I am much more at ease. I know that that person has gone thru a background check and is not a felon. This did not mean that I totally relaxed, but the person was treated with respect for going thru the process of getting their CCW. I know that they are most likely a very responsable person and would more than likely back me up in a bad situation if I needed help.
They are also someone who I respect because they are a person who is willing to be responsable for themselves and their own safety. Not some damn Sheepeople.
If stopped and you are legally CCW, Turn off your engine, if it is at night, turn the interior lights on, Roll the window down, place your hands on the steering wheel or thru the steering wheel on the dash. Tell other passengers to keep their hands in plain sight and not make any sudden movements. Tell the officer that you have a current CCW and have a firearm on you or in your vehicle. Tell them where the gun is. Ask them what they would like you do do. Do not make any fast movements such as reaching into the glovebox for your paperwork or license. This shows the officer that you respect him or her and will help to put the officer at ease.
Some officers will still be idiots, mostly the young ones who think that they are the only one's who should have firearms. If I stopped you and you had a CCW, you were more likely not to get a ticket from me. If an officer is rude about the fact that you are CCW and treats you badly, go to the station and file a complaint. The officers safety is importent, but the fact that you have complied with the law, are not a felon and have showed that you are a responsable person should be taken into consideration by the officer. If you do as I recommended, the officer would have a hard time defending unprofessional actions on his part. Respect is something that has to be earned. Both you and the officer must do your part to earn each others respect.
John K
 
I did not 'jump out and approach her' either. I came out real slow (and the yelling started and the gun came out) and walked around the front of my vehicle and then down the sidewalk towards her with my hands clearly visible half raised. Very non threatening.

The mere fact you were not complying with, and I might add LAWFUL orders, WAS threatening. In my personal/professional opinion, you got lucky, REAL lucky.
 
I guess I should have explained more clearly. I would ask to see the permit. If he has the permit then having the gun is not a problem at least not for me. People tell me the have a DL all the time, it dosent mean they really do. As long as the person has a CCW then I don't care other then being a person who likes handguns and may ask out of interest to see it and I would explain that.

If there were a disturbance or some other reason which I would need to see the weapon then having a CCW wouldn’t mater. The same rule would apply to a LEO. Take a restraining order for instance from domestic violence. Some orders require you to hand in your firearms. I think that sucks but LEOs don't make the rules. Most of us are pro 2nd amendment and don’t like the idea of taking firearms from citizens who have not broke the law. I think that for some reason some people think that we do or that we want to have some level of superiority over a non LEO when it comes to firearms and for me it’s not the truth. Most of my partners feel the same; at least I hope they do. I hope that who ever reads this sees the spirit behind it rather then thinking that we are looking to get into their business. All most LEOs want is to finish the day and go home.

I also know of 2 cases and I am sure there are more of armed citizens saving officers who were held at gun point. I am in favor of a armed citizen who is not a criminal.
 
Some of the posts here seem a little...contrarian.

In my experience, a CHL here in Texas pretty much renders you immune from moving violations.
 
Why stop drivers for minor traffic violations at all? Why not just mail them citations?

All the concern for “officer safety†is somewhat disingenuous.

~G. Fink
 
The mere fact you were not complying with, and I might add LAWFUL orders, WAS threatening. In my personal/professional opinion, you got lucky, REAL lucky.

Point well taken about being lucky. With all the police shootings nowadays any encounter with police where you aren't shot is a lucky day. I knew I wasn't a threat to the officer and was in fact taking steps to secure the officers peace of mind and safety as well as my own property rights. It is a very fine line and a dangerous situation and don't think that I don't know that. However stupid my actions may have seemed, there was an intent of good will to all involved even though she may not have found that out until after shooting me.

Would you go home feeling bad if you thought your traffic stop was jumping out to attack you and you shot him just to find out that he had locked himself away from his weapon and could not have been a threat to you?

With all due respect the lawful orders statement is debatable. You can't reasonably order me to stay in my vehicle just so you can terry search. I see nothing threatening about exiting one's vehicle to speak with an officer when they pull you over for traffic. If I do not 'rush' you, but spread my fingers and arms and slowly turn away from you, what threat am I posing? If you're worried about your safety, stay behind cover and order me to the ground to be frisked. I, having acheived my goal of putting a lock between me and you and my weapon, will comply. Terry frisk my person for your safety and then respect my property.

This is not a disrespect to a thinking officer. Only a paranoid officer would shoot me at that point. The administrative rules of terry are abused against citizens and this is merely a citizen walking the fine line of the last shred of implied rights that we do have. More of a manuever against the administration than a disrespect or threat to the officer. I cannot in good conscience 'sheepily' let the administration roll over me with my full cooperation by consenting to every thing they say. Constitutional hardball may get me killed one day. So far I've been faring better playing it. Go figure.
 
problem is that YOU knowing you aren't a threat isn't good enough. if a police officer asks you to get back in your car and you refuse to comply and start approaching the officer, you are out of control. I think it's perfectly reasonable for a police officer to need to get the situation under his control when he makes a traffic stop.

it seems that your clear prejudice against law enforcement may be affecting your judgment. I don't think you are lucky to have not been shot, but if law enforcement can't get you under control verbally, then at some point they may reasonably need to take the next step.
 
Edward,

With all do respect, your listening to Massad Ayoob and your playing a VERY dangerous game. Mr Ayoob's opinion, with alot of professional firearms trainers and law enforcement officers, isn't worth the paper its printed on. You will loose and it will cost you dearly. It has nothing to do with a "terry frisk." It is obvious, by your posts, your actually very ignorant to what is the real laws, etc.

The United States Supreme Court, the SUPREME law of the land, has said I can, as a peace officer on a traffic stop, order you to stay in the car and/or get out of the car. This holds true for passengers as well as the driver. And, by not following said lawful and, I repeat, LAWFUL orders of a peace officer (remember the supreme court has said so; therefore who do you appeal too?), your committing a crime.

It doesn't matter about "shooting" you. What matters is other uses of force, etc. Read: Getting the you know what kicked out of you.

I will tell you this. Had you done what you did where I work, as a police officer, you probably would have found yourself in the hospital, and then enroute to our jail. Your car would have been towed, with broken windows to get the gun, and you would have been charged with possession of a loaded firearm in public and for resisting arrest.

Play all of the RKBA and all of the other games you want. However, again, you will loose. Those are the facts of life; those are the laws.

And an officer talking to an alleged driver makes the difference?

Yes it does. You can verify who the driver is and therefore issue a citation the proper person. If said person does not and cannot provide satisfactory proof of identification (satisfactory to the peace officer making the stop, not YOUR satisfaction) you will go to jail.
 
It's not a prejudice against Law Enforcement, it's a bias to Rights! The administration has pitted us against one another judicially and 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th make an excercise necessary if I am to have any hope of protection from the legislative wiles of modern abuse, err enforcement.

I don't always exit the vehicle. I did that time. I must've walked the fine line good enough cause I wasn't shot and got no new charges or tickets. Very odd and disheartening that the very basis of the country is such an offensive trigger to officers of the law. It shouldn't be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top