Henry Bowman
Senior Member
I looked up their patent (5,705,763) which issued in 1998 (filed in 1996). It shows it to be a simple device that locks the striker in a forword position after the initial trigger pull and then releases the striker when the trigger is released. In other words, it goes into full slam-fire mode.
It would be simple to construct (the patent tells you exactly how to do it) and I'd bet that patent infringement liability is the least of a gang banger's worries.
I don't know how to post a copy of the patent here. If you want it or a link to the US Patent and Trademark Office online version, PM me.
It would be simple to construct (the patent tells you exactly how to do it) and I'd bet that patent infringement liability is the least of a gang banger's worries.
I don't know how to post a copy of the patent here. If you want it or a link to the US Patent and Trademark Office online version, PM me.
As a state subdivision, they are probably protected by sovereign immunity from a claim of copyright infringement -- as well as a "fair use" claim.which leads me to wonder if...
Last edited: