home defense choices

Status
Not open for further replies.

bill2

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
289
Location
bay area California
this is from a blog (http://confederateyankee.mu.nu/archives/200953.php) that I got to from instapundit.com. It deals with helping newbies select home defense options. Read it and comment.
________________________________________________

It seems that as we get closer to the holidays, we see an increase in the number of potential firearms purchasers inquiring about home defense weapons for the first time.

Most potential purchasers turn to the "gun expert" in their family or circle of friends for guidance, who often in turn glean their information from other shooters and from gun magazines. Employees of gun shops are often another resource that people know and trust. Sadly, most of the information provided by all of these experts is—in my not so humble opinion—completely wrong.

Pick up any popular gun magazine in the United States today, and you will be quickly overwhelmed at the plethora of tricked-out tactical carbines based on the M16/AR15 platform, intimidating 12-guage combat shotguns, and highly customized pistols costing thousands of dollars. Odds are that when the conversation comes around to which firearms is best suited for home defense, gun magazine authors and your neighborhoods experts will quickly zero in on a 12-guage pump-action shotgun in one flavor or another, with 00-buckshot often mentioned as the ammunition of choice.

You could make a worse choice—a long-barreled single-shot Sharps rifle in .45/70, or on the other extreme, a cheap .25 semi-automatic pistol—but the ubiquitous 12-guage pump touted by neighborhood amateurs and professional gun writers is often the wrong choice for most homeowners.

I first addressed the point when I wrote a post called Overcoming The "Viagra Theory" of Home Defense on March 15 in response to an Instapundit reader looking for advice on a home security shotgun that could be used by her and her husband.

She wrote:

I have a great little .22 Browning rifle for plinking, but my husband and I are looking to purchase a shotgun for home security. Not sure what's the best shotgun to get for this, although I'm leaning towards a pump action for the sound effects, which I'm told can be a good deterrent. Would love to hear recommendations from folks. Also wondering if we can get a shotgun that can also be used for trap or skeet, or are guns just too specialized these days? Looking for cost info too, for new and used. Thanks for your advice!
This is very similar to the questions I got from husband-and-wife customers of mine two weeks ago under a far more stressful situation. They were two young homeowners awoken the previous night when someone attempted to force open the back door of their home. When they came to me the following evening they were still visibly shaken as they explained that they’d talked to an "expert" they knew who suggested a 12-gauge pump shotgun equipped with a extended magazine and filled with 00-buckshot cartridges. They were not the first customers sent to me who had been told to make that specific choice by the "experts" they knew, and they won't be the last. They went home with something else.

Why?

As mentioned previously, gun geeks are a knowledgeable lot, but not all of what they "know" applies to all people in all situations. Most of your gun magazine writers are by definition long-term firearms users, usually with military, law enforcement, and/or hunting backgrounds. The vast majority of these writers became familiar with the idea of a 12-gauge shotgun filled with 00-buckshot because that is the most common gauge and loading issued to military and police shotgun users over the past 100 years. As a result, the conventional wisdom, based upon decades of successful use of this combination in military and police shootings, not to mention millions of successful big-game animals harvested, is that this loading works. It is almost unquestioned.

But are soldiers and police officers the same audience as home defense purchasers, and would they use their firearms in the same way, and in the same kinds of situations? The answer to all of these questions is a resounding "no."

12-gauge shotguns used by the military are primarily used for close-quarters offensive operations, like house-to-house fighting, and in guarding prisoners. Shotguns used by police are generally used to augment handguns in standoff situations or for guarding prisoners. In both instances, the person wielding the shotgun, either soldier or policeman, is likely to be a reasonably fit male with formal weapons training that is interjecting himself into a situation where he desires to control and overwhelm an opponent with superior short-range firepower.

Homeowners defending their lives against home invasion do not share the same goals, training, or in many instances, physical characteristics as those assumed by gun writers and other experts.

Unless the Census Bureau is way off, the majority of the American population is neither young nor male, nor necessarily in the best of health. Once you consider that a significant number of potential home defense customers are small-framed women, men, or youth, or may be aging, or may have other issues that prevent them from easily controlling a full-size 12-gauge shotgun, the absurdity of recommending this firearm to all home defense users becomes readily apparent.

In the example of my customers above, both were on the short and stocky side, and a full-size shotgun of any gauge was simply out of the equation. Neither could easily shoulder the weapon. All too often, gun writers and other experts overlook this basic issue.

In addition to the size of their frames, neither customer had much experience with firearms nor physically very strong, and so expecting them to reasonably control a shotgun with a pistol grip was also a dubious prospect. The fact that they lived in a community with a relatively high population density—small homes back-to-back and side to side-to-side small lots—made overpenetration also a significant issue.

What did I end up recommending?

This (the link didn't come across so here it is; http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3197/is_n3_v37/ai_12462187), specifically, even though it was not something we currently had in stock at the time.

While sniffed at by the experts, a .410-bore shotgun loaded with birdshot possesses more close-range stopping power than any popular handgun caliber, with far less danger of overpenetration. It is also much easier to operate and shoot accurately in high-stress situations than any handgun (which required well-practiced fine motor skills). The fact that this particular variant came with a laser-sight made it even more appropriate for these specific customers.

Is a .410 pump shotgun the "perfect" home defense weapon? Of course not; no weapon exists that can address the needs of all homes and homeowners. But what the HS 410 and other similar shotguns offer is a better compromise for most users, one that can be employed more successfully by a greater number of people. It is also often found at a far more reasonable price that the four-figure tactical firearms that seem to compose the bulk of the gun media's editorializing these days.

The advice I gave to the two customers I worked with was partially heeded. They were determined to leave the gun counter with something that night, and as I happened to be out of .410s at that time, they did as good as the could have under their self-imposed deadline.

They went with smaller shotgun than the full-size extended-magazine military-issue 12-gauge recommended by their friend. They selected a youth model 20-gauge with a shorter stock that both of them could handle reasonably well. They also went with light target loads instead of buckshot, which will be just as effective for the 12-15 ranges that they would expect, while being far safer in their dense suburban neighborhood.

There is no "one size fits all" solution for home defense. I simply wish more "experts" were willing to admit it.



Posted by Confederate Yankee at October 17, 2006 10:10 AM | TrackBack
 
.410 with buck shot isn't half bad, its technically 3 .38 special rounds fired in unison, birdshot from a .410 is a little lacking. A 12 gauge birdshot round fired at close range will create a big shallow wound that will incapacitate and may kill, but the .410 has a smaller amount of shot and a smaller diameter so you may have problems stopping a BG. Plus there is not a lot of options with a home defense .410 shotgun, most are long barreled and low capacity. The Mossberg HS 410 is the only good choice.

Personally I don't know why a pump shotgun is always the first choice in Home defense. I rather trust a handgun, or a carbine.
 
The good point to the 'article' is that the high-speed low-drag SOCOM model isn't always the best choice for the people/situation.

20 ga 1100 semi shotgun has minimal recoil and is well established as an effective game gun all the way up to white tail deer. Makes a great house gun too.

Sweet 16 Browning does well also.

All sorts of options when you don't let the cammo blind you.;)
 
Decisions, decisions...shotgun/handgun/carbine...why not one or, better yet, several of each? In trying to keep up with the latest in technology for HD purposes i decided long ago to keep at least a few examples of each offering.
 
I'm guessing that part of that home defense equation for people who are beginners, in regards to guns, is that it is easier to handle a long gun than a pistol. but I do think that maybe a 20 ga., as suggested above, might be a better choice. And maybe #4 shot is a good compromise between bird shot and buck shot.
 
My fiance and I were in a near-identical situation (we didn't have an attempted breakin, luckily). We decided to purchase a firearm for home security and spoke to family, friends, and gun shop employees. A rifle/carbine was ruled out almost immediately because it doesn't have the "spread" of a shotgun and requires the accuracy of a handgun but without the portability. Neither of us were ever in the military or law enforcement. Her father is an avid hunter, and she grew up around guns. She knew a 12ga wasn't for her; she has tendonitis in both shoulders so the recoil from a 12ga hits right where it hurts. I have a very small frame and full-size rifles and shotguns are not comfortable for me at all. I ride a desk all day and, like most Americans, don't make it to the gym as often as I should. Not one person recommended a .410 shotty... the gun shop owner proposed a youth 20ga or a handgun. Her dad said .45ACP. My fiance has shot his Ruger P-series .45 and did not like it. The fiance wasn't too keen on wielding a shotgun inside our home, or going to a range to practice with one. When all was said and done, we purchased a 9mm auto loader. We held several and picked the one that felt the best. I've read time and time again that the best gun is the one in your hands. Any gun is better than a pointy stick, but if you hestitate to grab your firearm to defend yourself, it might be too late. And if you hate shooting your gun because it's uncomfortable (grip or recoil), you'll never practice. If you don't practice and your skills fade, well, a bullet in the wall and not in the BG doesn't do any good.

It was a great blog, good to see someone bucking the trend of "conventional" wisdom.
 
This guy recomends a .410 loaded with birdshot for home defense? :what:

If they were concerned about roceoil I could maybe understand a 20ga or 16ga, loaded with buckshot. Even a .410 with slugs makes a little bit of sense. A pistol caliber carbine would work well here.

But how on earth can you reasonably expect a load of .410 birdshot to stop a hyped up criminal attacker? I've seen rabits and racoons shrug off hits from a .410 with birdshot.
 
Any long gun is a potential disadvantage in home defense be it a shotgun, carbine or rifle. Leading around a corner with the barrel of a long gun is a sure way to get it ripped out of your hands. Learn to use a pistol, keep it tucked in close and develop the ability to hit man sized targets at five to fifteen feet from practice. I like my shorty Mossberg Persuader 12 ga just fine, it sits by my bed with #4 buck 3" magnums right next to my Witness 10MM with sixteen 200gr hollow points. Guess which one I'll use first depends on where the break in occurs and weather I decide to barricade (use the 12 ga) or go forth and confront (the 10MM). The last time I answered a request to "borrow" a weapon it was from a very young lady who had a restraining order on her ex and he had come by and threatened her in her apartment. She was afraid he would break in and do her grave bodily harm late one night. I loande her a four quart saucepan and a couple of quarts of cooking oil. Told her to put it on the stove, keep it boiling lightly and toss it in his face when he broke through her door.
 
Well I think the author is just keeping a few of the firearms myths that he claims not to believe in. First we have the myth that women can't handle certain types of firearms:

Unless the Census Bureau is way off, the majority of the American population is neither young nor male, nor necessarily in the best of health. Once you consider that a significant number of potential home defense customers are small-framed women, men, or youth, or may be aging, or may have other issues that prevent them from easily controlling a full-size 12-gauge shotgun, the absurdity of recommending this firearm to all home defense users becomes readily apparent.

So we have to limit our options to the preconceived notion that women, older people, or young people can't handle a weapon with sufficient caliber to do the job should they need it too. I wonder how many .22 Jennings and Lorcins this guy sells these people.

And his knowledge of current military operations is lacking:

12-gauge shotguns used by the military are primarily used for close-quarters offensive operations, like house-to-house fighting, and in guarding prisoners.

12 gauge shotguns are used primarily as breaching weapons to open doors. The breacher then transitions to his M4 or M16.

In both instances, the person wielding the shotgun, either soldier or policeman, is likely to be a reasonably fit male with formal weapons training that is interjecting himself into a situation where he desires to control and overwhelm an opponent with superior short-range firepower.

More stereotypes and wrong information. Training on long guns is very negligable in most departments. And doesn't a victim of a home invasion wish to overwhelm the opponent with supieror short range firepower? Isn't that the idea behind even having a firearm for defensive purposes?

Homeowners defending their lives against home invasion do not share the same goals, training, or in many instances, physical characteristics as those assumed by gun writers and other experts.

If winning the fight isn't the same goal of the professionals, what, pray tell are the goals of the homeowner?

In the example of my customers above, both were on the short and stocky side, and a full-size shotgun of any gauge was simply out of the equation. Neither could easily shoulder the weapon. All too often, gun writers and other experts overlook this basic issue.

Last time I checked, most manufacturers and many aftermarket companies made youth stocks for just about every shotgun out there. Most regular stocks are too long for most of the American population. Perhaps suggesting a youth stock on another shotgun mught have been a solution?

While sniffed at by the experts, a .410-bore shotgun loaded with birdshot possesses more close-range stopping power than any popular handgun caliber, with far less danger of overpenetration.

.410 birdshot??:eek: I'll agree with the over penetration part, but the porblem is there is some doubt that .410 birdshot has sufficient penetration to incapacitate an intruder. Isn't that the ultimate goal of shooting the intruder?

It is also much easier to operate and shoot accurately in high-stress situations than any handgun (which required well-practiced fine motor skills).

An inexperienced shooter is just as likely to fumble the manipulation of a pump shotgun as any other weapon and is more likely to fumble then with some other types of actions. Racking the shotgun is a gross motor skill, but it's routinely fumbled by short stroking under the stress of a match by relatively experienced shooters.

I'm all for the weapon fitting the shooter. But for defensive purposes, the weapon/ammo combination must be sufficient to provide rapid incapacitation of the attacker. .410 birdshot does not meet that minimum standard. A pump shotgun is not the best choice for someone who will load it, put it up and proably never touch it until he/she needs it. A single shot shotgun or double barrel might be a better choice for those circumstances.

It seems like this is a commercial for the Mossberg Home Defender...

Jeff.
 
The Box O' Truth guys evaluated a 20 ga. shotgun with #3 buck and were suitably impressed with both penetration and power. My wife can comfortably shoot it, it will take down a bad guy. 'Nuff said. (.410 with birdshot? Is this guy serious?)

(Edited to change #2 buck to #3 buck. I misremembered.)
 
I've come to the conclusion that we have become over concerned with over penetration.

The only way to avoid over penetration is to use harsh words. When we're talking about two pieces of drywall stretched over two by fours, pretty much any firearm that isn't an over penetration risk is also not powerful enough to stop an attacker RIGHT EFFING NOW.

I do agree that in most home defense situations a 12ga with 00 (or worse, slugs) is more than needed, but a good 20ga with #3 or #4 buck shot would be a good choice for an HD shotgun.

My home defense gun is the MK9 I carry every day (with a Steyr M40 on the wife's side of the bed) and I don't feel under gunned (of course if I ever suffer a home invasion, I'd likely feel under gunned with an M249). But a .410 with bird shot seems pretty weak to me.
 
This "expert" is just as guilty of plowing ahead with his unproven assumptions as the "experts" he derides. Listening to a guy like this can, and will, get someone killed. A .410 with birdshot? Geez. The real answer to the question is the aformentioned 12 ga pump with 00 Buck, and some dadgum training. Simple as that. If self defense is a meaningful goal, then training is part and parcel with the deal.
 
This "expert" is just as guilty of plowing ahead with his unproven assumptions as the "experts" he derides. Listening to a guy like this can, and will, get someone killed. A .410 with birdshot? Geez. The real answer to the question is the aformentioned 12 ga pump with 00 Buck, and some dadgum training. Simple as that. If self defense is a meaningful goal, then training is part and parcel with the deal.

I dunno, I kinda tend to agree with the guy. Especially after seeing from Box 'o Truth how far buckshot goes through drywall. I'd rather have a gun that I'm comfortable with than a gun I don't like or timid of shooting, especially when it comes to a time where I HAVE to use it. Personally at this point, I'd rather have a .22lr pistol than a 9mm pistol since I suck at handguns and I'd probably have a real chance of hitting someone with a .22lr (yes I did shoot both). Got to keep in mind alot of people aren't avid shooters and gun enthusiasts. They want a defense weapon with minimal effort and a light gun is better than no gun (or in this case a heavier clumsier gun they may not be capable of using). They're not preping for a firefight, just against some thief who wants some loot.
 
I dunno, I kinda tend to agree with the guy. Especially after seeing from Box 'o Truth how far buckshot goes through drywall. I'd rather have a gun that I'm comfortable with than a gun I don't like or timid of shooting, especially when it comes to a time where I HAVE to use it. Personally at this point, I'd rather have a .22lr pistol than a 9mm pistol since I suck at handguns and I'd probably have a real chance of hitting someone with a .22lr (yes I did shoot both). Got to keep in mind alot of people aren't avid shooters and gun enthusiasts. They want a defense weapon with minimal effort and a light gun is better than no gun (or in this case a heavier clumsier gun they may not be capable of using). They're not preping for a firefight, just against some thief who wants some loot.
You simply cannot buy a gun and expect it to keep you safe. You MUST take the effort ncessary to learn to use it safely (so that you don't hurt yourself or someone else) and effectively (so that you can use it to stop an attacker).

The advice given in the article boils down to a recomendation for some people to choose "easy" weapons instead of the standard fare, so that they won't have to bother with proper training and practice. This advice is almost criminally negligent. It'll get someone hurt or killed.

The author writes about not falling prey to the usual firearms myths. Well, the article perpetuates the myth that you can walk into a gunstore and put $300 of "self defense" on your VISA card and come home all safe and secure. This is quite possibly the biggest and most dangerous firearms myth out there, and the author is spreading that myth far and wide.
 
Last edited:
Can you put a fist through drywall? Can you put a fist through a human? If you can punch a hole through a human and cause enough damage to stop 'em, you can sure punch a hole through drywall.
Does anybody recomend flares for HD? It would sure be hard on a BG if he was trying to chase you down while he was on fire. I'm guessing that a flare would have more 'oomph' than a .410 birdshot shell.
 
12 guage with buckshot, or if your recjoil sensative a 20 guage with buckshot; bolth in semi-automatic.


For a handgun, a Baby Eagle; 10rounds of 45acp, more accurate and reliable than todays de-spect bastardized "tacticool" 1911s.
 
An inexperienced shooter is just as likely to fumble the manipulation of a pump shotgun as any other weapon and is more likely to fumble then with some other types of actions. Racking the shotgun is a gross motor skill, but it's routinely fumbled by short stroking under the stress of a match by relatively experienced shooters.

Totally agree with that one. I rather a person use some sort of automatic action. Levers action and pump action longguns and SA revolvers are just bad news for a nervous beginner in a self defense situation.

You simply cannot buy a gun and expect it to keep you safe. You MUST take the effort ncessary to learn to use it safely (so that you don't hurt yourself or someone else) and effectively (so that you can use it to stop an attacker).

But headless it comes with a Video:p
 
"I rather a person use some sort of automatic action. Levers action and pump action longguns and SA revolvers are just bad news for a nervous beginner in a self defense situation."

So true. Beginners can even bungle a bolt-action.
How do I know? My first use of a rifle involved a bolt-action .22 versus a snake. For reasons I don't remember, I pulled the bolt back twice or something of the kind... and had a double feed. Think I was checking the chamber. Would hate to see it happen in a real emergency - the snake was just moseying around in a flower bed, no one was in real danger.
 
You simply cannot buy a gun and expect it to keep you safe. You MUST take the effort ncessary to learn to use it safely (so that you don't hurt yourself or someone else) and effectively (so that you can use it to stop an attacker).

The advice given in the article boils down to a recomendation for some people to choose "easy" weapons instead of the standard fare, so that they won't have to bother with proper training and practice. This advice is almost criminally negligent. It'll get someone hurt or killed.

The author writes about not falling prey to the usual firearms myths. Well, the article perpetuates the myth that you can walk into a gunstore and put $300 of "self defense" on your VISA card and come home all safe and secure. This is quite possibly the biggest and most dangerous firearms myth out there, and the author is spreading that myth far and wide.

Well, you can't assume everyone is responsible. People need to learn how to use a car safely, but looking at figures for fatal car accidents every year it's obvious that not everyone does. If people are unwilling to practice much to begin with, they will practice much less with a gun they don't like, so you might as well give them a gun that's easier to learn with. Or make a law about it...but we all know how that goes.
 
Every time I hear .410 I think of the home invasion attempt not long ago where the elderly man and his grandson were victims. IIRC he shot the BG twice with a .410 loaded with buckshot and had to transition to his 30-06 hunting rifle to stop the threat.
If 12gauge is tough for the woman of the house, or for someone elderly or disabled I'd recommend a 20 gauge and/or reduced recoil rounds #4 or larger.
There's too much hype about overpenetration. You won't find something that will reach vital organs that won't penetrate at least a few sheets of drywall. Hopefully your shots will find their mark. I've never heard anyone say "Well, she was killed by the intruder but at least her shots didn't go through any walls". Birdshot will leave a nasty looking shallow wound. Maybe the BG will be stone sober and say "OW that hurt, and that's a nasty looking shallow wound! Forget this, I'm gonna go home." But I'm not going to take that chance.
 
I agree with the author that for people not used to firearms that are NOT going to get used to them a youth size shotgun makes better sense it is much easier to handle - but, I believe a light youth 20 gauge can kick as hard as a heavier 12 gauge just because it is lighter - still its a good enough choice

As for not killing with a .410 shotgun - I started on a mossberg bolt action .410, 30 inch barrel full choke and with #6 shot high brass field loads I was deadly to squirrels and rabbits easily out to 50 yards - hit them in the head and they drop like a sack of beans! I would trust a .410 but not with low brass light birdshot and not for beginners that don't practice. An 11 year old can develop some pretty fast reflexes but not Grandma (well not all of them). If all I have is a .410 and you break into my house you ain't walkin out. They used to market an HR single barrel .410 with the barrel cut to 18" and the stock cut off so it was 26 inches overall - it was advertised for the housewife to sit in the closet with and if the badguy opened the door blast him.

As for it being too long when searching the house these people should not search they should phone.

Did you notice how the author mentioned the "spread" at the distance from a bedroom door to a far wall on most houses say 10 to 15 feet the "spread" will not make up for not aiming so he doesn't sound like such an expert to me.

Just another opinion claiming to be better than the rest.

Which is OK just admit it!:)
 
hhhmmm if a 70 something year old man was able to have pellets peppered from a 28ga into his face then I don't feel comfortable using a .410. yes yes I know different situations and dick shot him from much farther away but it still just makes me nervous. Obviously bird shot from a .410 within so many yards would be capable of producing a very negative effect for a potential BG but myself being a paranoid foil hat wearer, am much more fond of the feeling of a 100 sum lumen light back up by 28rnds of mushrooming hollowpoints. mmmm nothing like excessive force..... haha I laugh because I have no money left:( oh who am I kidding, I'd have blown it all anyways :D
 
Gee.

Guess I need to break the news to my wife that according to this expert, she's too old, too frail and too weak to use any of the 12 ga. 870s loaded with 00 buckshot (slugs in the Sidesaddles) that serve as house guns here.

lpl/nc
 
quote:
Does anybody recomend flares for HD? It would sure be hard on a BG if he was trying to chase you down while he was on fire. I'm guessing that a flare would have more 'oomph' than a .410 birdshot shell.

------------------------------------

ROTFL ; He'd also be fairly easy for the cops to spot if, by chance, he made it out of the house.:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top