Was thinking the same thing ...Thinking along those lines, theres no need to carry a spare mag or reload at all, for whatever might happen, stoppage, run empty, whatever.
Good luck with that. Some of us still have to work for a living. Guessin' you were never a 1911 guy, eh?I don't own any handgun mags that are 10 rounds or less, and I don't foresee myself buying any. I guess in that situation, my screen name says it all.
Was thinking the same thing ...
Good luck with that. Some of us still have to work for a living. Guessin' you were never a 1911 guy, eh?
Astonishingly, New York has a 7 round limit, and Kimber .45s hold exactly that. I parted with a Steyr that was never imported with a full-cap mags.
Wouldn't think of justifying limiting mag capacity, but my carry stuff maxes out at 10.
Moon
This is the point most are missing, gun is being defined by capable capacity not mag capacity.Cheers! No one may be called upon to carry a ten round mag in a pistol designed to carry more than 10 rounds. This is because pistols that can accept any magazine that can carry more than ten would be included in the upcoming "buyback or tax-it restrictions". The upcoming legislation wouldn't be like the Clinton Sunset Laws. They're going to close that "loophole" by including the gun's sheer ability to accept a magazine that goes beyond a 10-round capacity. So, for example, a Beretta 92FS would still be designated for sellback or taxation even if it only carries a 10-round mag.
This is the point most are missing, gun is being defined by capable capacity not mag capacity.
'splain.In this thread we do not carry pistols designed for more than 10 rounds with a 10 round mag
This guy explains things pretty well. Or at least what Biden is proposing. Nothing is written in stone yet.This is the first I have heard of this as far as handguns go. Y'all got a link to show me where it says that?
This guy explains things pretty well. Or at least what Biden is proposing. Nothing is written in stone yet.
Funny how the NRA seems to be mute on this, but maybe they are just waiting to see how best ot maximize their mailings for money.
Cheers! No one may be called upon to carry a ten round mag in a pistol designed to carry more than 10 rounds. This is because pistols that can accept any magazine that can carry more than ten would be included in the upcoming "buyback or tax-it restrictions". The upcoming legislation wouldn't be like the Clinton Sunset Laws. They're going to close that "loophole" by including the gun's sheer ability to accept a magazine that goes beyond a 10-round capacity. So, for example, a Beretta 92FS would still be designated for sellback or taxation even if it only carries a 10-round mag.
This guy explains things pretty well. Or at least what Biden is proposing. Nothing is written in stone yet.
Funny how the NRA seems to be mute on this, but maybe they are just waiting to see how best ot maximize their mailings for money.
I’m not sure they factor in aftermarket mags but what gun was designed for.Just an FYI, ProMag makes a 15 round mag for the LCP. No LCP for you!
No 1911 either.