Machete Control already taking hold in the US

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well as long as the bearer isn't covered with MS-13 or similar tatoos, I guess.

Will I need to register the machete in my garage or the Cold Steel kikri I won at shooting matches?
 
everyone agrees that no machete should have bayonet lugs

Well, okay, that does sound like it might be redundant.

But a good machete will have gun mounting lugs.

Vick
 
Creeping Incrementalism said:
OMG, you've never heard of California City?
Can't say I have. There are probably a few dozen "Florida" cities and "Maine" cities as well. And if Washington D.C. were named or commonly called "Washington City," then there would not have been a need for the State reference either.
 
Is Watts implying it is currently perfectly legal for me to walk around her district brandishing a machete with the intent to intimidate?

Does anyone else notice a pattern in new criminal laws?

Well, we haven't been enforcing the current laws that prohibit this behavior and it has gotten worse. What we need is a new harsher law!
That was exactly my reaction, and I had cut out the exact same sentence for quoting in my post. A new law is not needed. I am fairly certain that brandishing anything with a sharp edge, or even a blunt edge, as a threat is already the crime of assault with a deadly weapon. I find it amazing that a "law maker" doesn't know this.
 
A couple years ago, a bunch of skinheads in Tacoma were out looking for something to do and someone to do it to. They first approached a black guy and started yelling threats and racial BS. The black guy produced a machete and invited them to give it their best try. They suddenly remembered urgent business elsewhere. Unfortunately, they later came across an unarmed homeless guy and beat him to death, for which they are all serving life sentences now.

I think the defensive intimidation factor of a machete is a strong reason for them to be available. Besides, they aren't going to get accidentally fired if your kid gets hold of one (please don't gear up that debate). Of course, that's common sense, which seems in short supply in Massachusetts.
 
what a hypocrite....this watts is well-known to employ body guards that carry machetes. and it's only a matter of time before george clooney has something to say.....but i'll bet he's not about to stop his recreational sugar cain cutting trips to central america.
 
Any individual who requires a machete for the purposes of cutting vegetation shall register the machete

WHAT THE UNHOLY #$@#$ IS THIS?
:cuss:

Unbelievable! Gods save us from legislators! I cannot imagine having to register non-mechanical, non-combustible, inert, metal TOOLS with a governing body. They'll require licenses next! I'm going to have to lie down after this one. Remind me to skip any thread with "Massachusetts" or "Boston" in it from this point forward.

jmm
 
I just remembered, this came up on LiveJournal, and one response was to ask if registration was required if you intended to clear home invaders instead of vegetation. Since there's no mention of that, your home security machete shouldn't need to be registered, right?:neener:
 
$ $ $

"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. When there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
— Ayn Rand
 
oo7,

Lots of really weird bills get submitted. Very few of them become laws. It's only when they get out of committee and get close to votes on the floor that I really start worrying.
 
Around here brandishing and threatening someone with a machete would already be a felony level assault. Believe the same is true of most states. A specific statute making it a misdemeanor would actually lower the penalty. They need an IQ test for their Legislature.
 
Somebody follow that guy

He said:

"I'm headed out this evening to buy a few machettes before they are outlawed!!!"

That means he's headed out to take advantage of the Machete Show Loophole!

I wish this was all a joke. But, as the prison population reduces, that industry gets hungry. When coleges hit hard times, they reduced the requirements for getting in. Same thing with the crowbar hotel establishment. And I'm all for it because we have a massive prison industry in this county. Don't want a county full of half-wits out of work. And the prison guard crowd is a source of inmates itself. It's a sort of self-sustaining industry.

So let's find some more weapons. Has anyone mentioned sythes and sickles?

And how does anyone from Austin Texas know that there is a difference between Vermont and Massa[however its spelt]?

Another, more important question is: Which side of this important issue will Jesse Jackass and Al Charlatan come down on? And Sean Penbait? And George Loony?

rr
 
I sort of like the idea of gangs with machetes.

The way I see it is if they mess with me they would be making the mistake of taking a machete to a gun fight.
 
lbmii, depending on the range, the conditions and just how motivated the goblins are a gun might be a bad thing to bring to a machete fight. Even if you manage to draw and shoot and hit and seriously injure you may well not stop them. If he dies but you bleed out half a minute later you didn't win. And there will be some disagreement when you reach Valhalla about who has to hold the other guy's horse :rolleyes:

My first firearms instructor - and first serious knife combatives instructor - is of the firm belief that a handgun just gives you an advantage in the knife fight you were going to get into anyway. Put holes in him at range, then when he closes with you he'll have less blood, more distractions, and maybe something he was counting on won't work. If he falls down and doesn't get up you may allow yourself to be pleasantly surprised. Pessimistic, but words to live by. Literally.
 
Hi friends!
…an interesting topic.
For my father’s day gift, my wife purchased a TRUPER machete model U.S.A. : 33178 with an 18 inch, double edged blade, at Wall Mart for about fourteen dollars. Its back is a saw blade …thus double edged. The machete is made in China, but it seems that it will be adequate enough. But, I live in Mexico City. Most of you may not have experienced living in a genuine, oppressive country such as Mexico. It is strange. In regard to weapons, all edged weapons are sold openly and that includes Chinese made switch blades, but if you are apprehended in public by an “authority” and you have with you a blade longer than two and one half inches, a number of things may happen. It may be confiscated and you may be cited with a note that gives you the opportunity to go to the local “Delegacion” to explain why you had it and to ask that it be returned it to you. Or, the blade, if it’s a good one, and even if it’s technically legal, may be confiscated and you will not see it again. Or, you may be detained for having the weapon and even arrested, and so on. What ensues if you are apprehended with a blade is entirely at the discretion of the officer, or the officers, at the scene. Interestingly, in Mexico, the question of whether or not machetes are illegal weapons is unresolved. Machetes are part of the culture, in so much as, they are needed for daily work in rural areas, and sometimes machetes are openly brandished by many rural demonstrators when they congregate in the capital, Mexico City, to voice their grievances.
But, the primary difference between Mexico and the U. S. is that in the U. S. you are allowed to defend yourself, and in Mexico it is not legal to defend yourself – regardless of written ‘laws’ to the contrary. In Mexico, if you succeed in taking a life on your own property - in self-defense - then, in Mexico …your best option may be to remove the body from your home. That is a gruesome, risky, traumatic scenario. But in Mexico if the “authorities” know of your act you will be detained …and even tried …and the outcome will not be certain. And regardless of the outcome, the expenses may be prohibitive.
Even if you are in some mundane altercation and things get somewhat violent, then, the ‘law’ is regarded as a “reference point” by the “authorities” and the outcome is always uncertain. The outcome may, or may not, favor you  Every written law in Mexico ends with the same stipulation, “And that is the law, unless the Judge deems otherwise” (!). (Trail by jury does not exist in Mexico.) There is scant certainty in those regards. That is why seventy percent of violent crimes in Mexico go unreported, and of all reported violent crimes…ninety percent of them are unsolved!
(By contrast, civil cases are - generally - followed through in a formal and adequately procedural manner.)
All guns are forbidden and are almost as illegal as hand grenades and full automatics.
Consider yourselves fortunate that you live in a country where you have the right to defend yourselves if need be. And consider yourselves very lucky, that even though you may have too many laws …you do know, at least with some certainty, where you stand in regard to them.
You all be well!
Yours, Reed
 
Welcome to THR, Reed, and thanks for the information. However, this thread is over five years old, and we refer to the resurrection of such as "necro-threadia". :) Please don't, in the future.

The purpose of this forum is to discuss laws which have been passed or which have been proposed, as well as court decisions, pertaining to firearms.

Not trying to be mean, but we do have rules which we think are pretty-much just common sense.

Again, welcome to the playpen.

Art
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top