Marshall
Member
Yea, probably, see my sig line.He'd probably have lobbed a couple of cruise missiles at them, and that would have been that.
And, "that would have been that," for then, just like that was that with Clinton. Lob a missile, do an intern, yawn. While all the time the same group that bombed the World Trade Center comes back and nails the Twin Towers and our Pentagon with our own planes. I seem to remember a bunch of other AQ attacks on US interests too. Yea boy, doing nothing really worked well, great plan.
I don't even know what your paragraph means, I read it three times, must need a fourth? Probably me, been a long, long day. Anyway, I'll take a Republican President, House and Senate, over the same with a Democratic anti-gun President. I dunno, maybe that's just stupid of me, the President of the USA doesn't have a bully pulpit or anything, no way he can sway public opinion any over four years. Oh yea, that veto power thing too, that might get in the way?You are probably wrong on that, if history is any judge. With a Gore or Kerry in the presidency, we'd not only have huge majorities in the House and Senate, but they'd be galvanized to stop anything he tried to do in terms of gun control, transforming us into a police state or sending all of our industrial jobs to India and Mexico, because we'd hold their feet to the fire. Those same Republican Congressmen and Senators, however, under Bush don't feel they have the popular support to go up against a Republican president.
And don't give me the BS about Supreme Court Nominees.
Sorry, if you would rather have a possible three more Democratic anti-gun Supreme Court Justices, that's your right. I'll take my chances with Republicans thank you.
Last edited: