Mexico Retaliates for Border Wall Plan

Status
Not open for further replies.

rick_reno

member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
3,027
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/12/20/D8EK6GGO9.html

MEXICO CITY - The Mexican government, angered by a U.S. proposal to extend a wall along the border to keep out migrants, has struck back with radio ads urging Mexican workers to denounce rights violations in the United States. Facing a growing tide of anti-immigrant sentiment north of the border, the Mexican government is also hiring an American public relations firm to improve its image.

Mexican President Vicente Fox denounced the U.S. measures, passed by the House of Representatives on Friday, as "shameful" and his foreign secretary, Luis Ernesto Derbez, said Monday the wall was "stupid."

It's hard to underestimate the ill-feeling the proposal has generated in Mexico, where editorial pages are dominated by cartoons of Uncle Sam putting up walls bearing anti-Mexican messages.

Many Mexicans, especially those who have spent time working in the U.S., feel the proposal is a slap in the face to those who work hard and contribute to the U.S. economy.

Fernando Robledo, 42, of the western state of Zacatecas, says the proposals could stem migration and disrupt families by breaking cross- border ties.

"When people heard this, it worried everybody, because this will affect everybody in some way, and their families," Robledo said. "They were incredulous. How could they do this, propose something like this?"

Robledo, whose son and mother are U.S. citizens, predicted the measure "would unleash conflict within the United States" as small businesses fail for lack of workers.

He said many Mexicans felt betrayed by the anti-immigrant sentiment.

"We learned to believe in the United States. We have a binational life," he said of Zacatecas, a state that has been sending migrants north for more than a century. "It isn't just a feeling of rejection. It's against what we see as part of our life, our culture, our territory."

The government is scrambling to fight on two fronts. On Monday, it announced it had hired Allyn & Company, a Dallas-based public relations company to help improve Mexico's image and stem the immigration backlash.

"If people in the U.S. and Canada had an accurate view of the success of democracy, political stability and economic prosperity in Mexico, it would improve their views on specific bilateral issues like immigration and border security," Rob Allyn, president of the PR firm, told The Associated Press Tuesday.

Jose Luis Soberanes, head of the government's National Human Rights Commission, suggested Mexico go further.

"I would expect more energetic reactions from our authorities," Soberanes told local media. "It's preferable to have a more demanding government, more confrontation with the United States."

Mexico has also said it is recruiting U.S. church, community and business groups to oppose the proposal.

And the government has stepped up its defense of migrants, airing a series of radio spots here aimed at migrants returning home for the holidays.

"Had a labor accident in the United State? You have rights ... Call," reads the ad, sponsored by Mexico's Foreign Relations Department, which has helped migrants bring compensation suits in the United States.

The sense of dread connected with the measures is hardly restricted to Mexico. Immigrant advocacy and aid groups in the United States are worried about provisions of the House bill that upgrade unlawful presence in the United States from a civil offense to a felony.

"This is a sad foreshadowing," said immigrants rights activist Kathryn Rodriguez of the Derechos Humanos coalition in Tucson, Ariz. She fears the bill could expose those who help sick or dying migrants to criminal prosecution.

The House bill, passed on a 239-182 vote, would also enlist military and local law enforcement to help stop illegal entrants and require employers to verify the legal status of their workers.

Mexicans are outraged by the proposed measures, especially the extension of the border wall, which many liken to the Berlin Wall. Some are urging their government to fight it fiercely.

"Our president should oppose that wall and make them stop it, at all costs," said Martin Vazquez, 26, at the Mexico City airport as he returned from his job as a hotel worker in Las Vegas. "More than just insulting, it's terrible."

____
 
If they protest it so much, it must be good for us. Either way, a measure like that is bound to drag out into the light every last abuser of the system, no matter which side of the border they happen to occupy.

I like it.
 
They've already retaliated pre-emptively with a number of tunnels.:cuss:
***'re they gonna do? Threaten to stay in Mexico?
Nope. They're gonna start pouring across the border in even greater numbers in order to beat the deadline, just as they do everytime Jorge mentions an amnesty. Viva La Aztlan! Viva La Reconquista!
Biker
 
Mexico Promises to Block Border Wall Plan

MODS Delete or merge as necessary as it is basically the same story different title from same news service

Mexico Promises to Block Border Wall Plan

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/12/20/D8EK9N0G6.html

By MARK STEVENSON
Associated Press Writer
Dec 20 7:02 PM US/Eastern

MEXICO CITY - The Mexican government, angered by a U.S. proposal to extend a wall along the border to keep out migrants, pledged Tuesday to block the plan and organize an international campaign against it. Facing a growing tide of anti-immigrant sentiment north of the border, the Mexican government has taken out ads urging Mexican workers to denounce rights violations in the United States. It also is hiring an American public relations firm to improve its image and counter growing U.S. concerns about immigration.

Mexican President Vicente Fox denounced the U.S. measures, passed by the House of Representatives on Friday, as "shameful" and his foreign secretary, Luis Ernesto Derbez, echoed his complaints on Tuesday.

"Mexico is not going to bear, it is not going to permit, and it will not allow a stupid thing like this wall," Derbez said.

"What has to be done is to raise a storm of criticism, as is already happening, against this," he said, promising to turn the international community against the plan.

Some stretches of the U.S.-Mexico border are already marked by fences, but in some heavily-trafficked sections walls have already been erected by the United States, often using 10-foot-high sections of military surplus steel. Those sections, which typically run several miles, can be found in southern Arizona and California.

It's hard to underestimate the ill-feeling the proposal has generated in Mexico, where editorial pages are dominated by cartoons of Uncle Sam putting up walls bearing anti-Mexican messages.

Many Mexicans, especially those who have spent time working in the U.S., feel the proposal is a slap in the face to those who work hard and contribute to the U.S. economy.

Fernando Robledo, 42, of the western state of Zacatecas, says the proposals could stem migration and disrupt families by breaking cross- border ties.

"When people heard this, it worried everybody, because this will affect everybody in some way, and their families," Robledo said. "They were incredulous. How could they do this, propose something like this?"

Robledo, whose son and mother are U.S. citizens, predicted the measure "would unleash conflict within the United States" as small businesses fail for lack of workers.

He said many Mexicans felt betrayed by the anti-immigrant sentiment.

"We learned to believe in the United States. We have a binational life," he said of Zacatecas, a state that has been sending migrants north for more than a century. "It isn't just a feeling of rejection. It's against what we see as part of our life, our culture, our territory."

The government is scrambling to fight on two fronts. On Monday, it announced it had hired Allyn & Company, a Dallas-based public relations company to help improve Mexico's image and stem the immigration backlash.

"If people in the U.S. and Canada had an accurate view of the success of democracy, political stability and economic prosperity in Mexico, it would improve their views on specific bilateral issues like immigration and border security," Rob Allyn, president of the PR firm, told The Associated Press Tuesday.

Jose Luis Soberanes, head of the government's National Human Rights Commission, suggested Mexico go further.

"I would expect more energetic reactions from our authorities," Soberanes told local media. "It's preferable to have a more demanding government, more confrontation with the United States."

Mexico has also said it is recruiting U.S. church, community and business groups to oppose the proposal.

And the government has stepped up its defense of migrants, airing a series of radio spots here aimed at migrants returning home for the holidays.

"Had a labor accident in the United States? You have rights ... Call," reads the ad, sponsored by Mexico's Foreign Relations Department, which has helped migrants bring compensation suits in the United States.

The sense of dread connected with the measures is hardly restricted to Mexico. Immigrant advocacy and aid groups in the United States are worried about provisions of the House bill that upgrade unlawful presence in the United States from a civil offense to a felony.

"It would have a horrific impact on immigrants right organizing and immigrant communities" in the United States, said Jennifer Allen of the Tucson, Ariz.-based Red de Accion Fronteriza.

The mistaken belief that the proposals are a done deal _ they must still be submitted to the Senate _ have caused "just complete fear and shock" among some activists and immigrants, Allen said.

The House bill, passed on a 239-182 vote, includes a proposal to build 700 miles of additional fence through parts of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. It would also enlist military and local law enforcement to help stop illegal entrants and require employers to verify the legal status of their workers.

Mexicans are outraged by the proposed measures, especially the extension of the border wall, which many liken to the Berlin Wall. Some are urging their government to fight it fiercely.

"Our president should oppose that wall and make them stop it, at all costs," said Martin Vazquez, 26, at the Mexico City airport as he returned from his job as a hotel worker in Las Vegas. "More than just insulting, it's terrible."

____

Associated Press reporter Victor Bermudez contributed to this report from Mexico City.

_____

On the Net:

http://presidencia.gob.mx/en/
 
Jose Luis Soberanes, head of the government's National Human Rights Commission, suggested Mexico go further.

"I would expect more energetic reactions from our authorities," Soberanes told local media. "It's preferable to have a more demanding government, more confrontation with the United States."

Bring. It. On.
 
Fernando Robledo, 42, of the western state of Zacatecas, says the proposals could stem migration...
Gee, ya think? :scrutiny:
"We learned to believe in the United States. We have a binational life," he said of Zacatecas, a state that has been sending migrants north for more than a century. "It isn't just a feeling of rejection. It's against what we see as part of our life, our culture, our territory."
Well, thats part of the problem. For FAR too long Mexican (and other) immigrants have had a "binational" life, beyond the generation that immigrates into this nations. Oh, and a clue to Mr. Zacatecas. If you're a Mexican national, this is NOT your territory. A war was once fought that should have settled the matter, but I guess it did not. Maybe you folks need a repeat of the lesson?

Allyn&Company Their web site is here. http://www.allynco.com/index3.html Looks like an international company. Time to let 'em know how you feel about this meddling in OUR internal affairs. :fire:
 
Many Mexicans, especially those who have spent time working in the U.S., feel the proposal is a slap in the face to those who work hard and contribute to the U.S. economy.

Contribute to the US economy? I guess he means by eating up all our healthcare recources and education dollars. :banghead:
 
Mabey we wouldn't need a wall if mexico could enforce their own border. Don't get me wrong I have no problem with mexican immigrants coming to America. The problem is that along with immigrants seeking jobs, come armed drug runners, gun runners, and (the possibility of) terrorists. I believe anyone capable of holding a job should be able to come to America(personal opinion), however, there is nothing racist, anti-immigrant, or isolationist about wanting to have secure borders. If (hypothetically) there was open immigration, then we could screen all immigrant at the border and there would be no need to sneek in unless they had illegal aims.

Also, because every immigrant would be registered, they could be taxed. That would help pay for all the social services that they are a drain on now.
 
They are worried about a darn wall? I would make it a mine field if I could. If you want to come here, do it the legal way like my forefathers did.
 
If legal immigrants can still enter at the border checkpoints, I can see no reason for Mexico to be mad, other than them wanting people to continue to come in here illegally.
 
I don't have a problem with immigrants who come from any nation, as long as they're arriving legally.
 
Rusher said:
Facing a growing tide of anti-immigrant sentiment north of the border...

Yes, because we all know that its nothing more than xenophobic white Americans trying to keep honest brown people out :rolleyes:


Everywhere you see a reference to "immagrants" you need to remember this word:
ILLEGAL
 
Since when do Mexico and these clowns have a say in US internal affairs and national security policy? Let's see who in the media would pay any attention to what they say. Might reveal a thing or two.
 
Vincente Fox is talking tough. Mexican leaders have a habit of doing that. Last time they talked that tough to us, the American flag ended up flying over Mexico City and they were lucky we let them keep half of their country instead of consuming the whole damn thing, as we rightfully won in war with them.
 
for what it's worth... Bush-Mexico

VDARE.COM - http://www.vdare.com/sailer/bush_thinking.htm

January 11, 2004
The Bush Betrayal: Maybe He’s Not Thinking But Feeling—Family Feeling, Mexican Style

By Steve Sailer

The more you study the details of the new White House immigration plan, the more the question resounds: What is Bush thinking?

Forget the amnesty for a moment. Just consider Bush's "temporary worker" program. Judging from the three White House statements this week, as I wrote in a UPI article, anybody on the face of the Earth (not just Mexicans) will get the right to move to America country for an indefinite number of years, with their families, as long as they have a job offer paying the minimum wage of $10,712 per year.

That would mark the end of the American people's traditional patrimony of relatively high wages and low land prices. Indeed, it would rapidly mean the end of America as a coherent community i.e. a nation.

The ramifications of the plan are ridiculous. For example, an immigrant businessman could immediately import his entire extended family by offering them all jobs in the family operation.

Quite obviously, nobody in the White House has thought this topic through at all.

Even on a political level, Bush's plan to drive a wedge issue into the heart of his own party seems bizarre. Orange County Congressman Dana Rohrabacher told me,

"I can't see that it would play well at the polls. I personally don't see this as good for GOP. The proposal being made will keep wages down and that won't be popular with the American voters."

[Conservatives question Bush immigrant plan By Steve Sailer, UPI, January 8, 2004]
What is Bush Thinking? Two Answers

So what is Bush thinking? Let me give two answers, one personal and the other dynastic.
bullet Answer # 1, three years into his term, now seems obvious:

Nothing.

Mr. Bush simply does not like to think.

That's one of the two main lessons in the first and probably most objective biography of the man, First Son: George W. Bush and the Bush Family Dynasty by reporter Bill Minutaglio. He interviewed 300 people who had known George W. So far as I can tell, he couldn't find a single one who remembered the future President ever saying anything interesting.

I've often wondered why Bush rarely fires any of his advisors, no matter how incompetent they prove. This weekend the reason became clear when one of the few important figures he's dumped went public. Jonathan Weisman reported in the Washington Post on Saturday:

“President Bush showed little interest in policy discussions in his first two years in the White House, leading Cabinet meetings ‘like a blind man in a roomful of deaf people,’ former Treasury secretary Paul H. O'Neill says in an upcoming book on the Bush White House … Bush was so inscrutable that administration officials had to devise White House policy on ‘little more than hunches about what the president might think.’”

Discussing complex matters of state with the President was like talking to a blank wall:

“In the 60 Minutes interview, O'Neill described his first Cabinet meeting with the president: ‘I went in with a long list of things to talk about and, I thought, to engage [him] on. And as the book said, I was surprised that it turned out to be me talking and the president just listening . . . As I recall it was mostly a monologue.’”

This is why Bush doesn't want to fire anybody: He is reluctant to let anybody go who has been intimately exposed to his vacuity. He can count on his current minions to keep up the charade. But, if he fires them, they might, like O'Neill, reveal to the world what a zero the President is.

Bush isn't stupid, but he is extraordinarily intellectually lazy. Minutaglio's book documents that the only topics that have ever engaged his interest for long are baseball and the study of how to organize and manipulate people.

He has spent his life in a long series of seemingly interesting jobs arranged by his father and father's friends—all of which have rapidly paled on him.

For example, to avoid the risk of being drafted and sent to Vietnam, he was handed a coveted Air National Guard gig. You might think that being given the ultimate toy, a supersonic fighter jet, would have held his attention. But Bush eventually just stopped showing up.

You might think that George W. would find being President to be a mentally stimulating occupation. Yet not only does he take less interest in his job than millions of people take in their own jobs … he shows less interest in his job than millions of citizens show in his job!
bullet Answer # 2 to the question of what Bush is thinking, or feeling:

Dynasty.

One thing you can say for sure is that the Bush-Walker family is truly a self-conscious dynasty, operating at the highest levels of American society for four generations. Mario Puzo, author of The Godfather, noted, "Any family—nuclear or otherwise—that wants to learn how the game is really played should study the Bush dynasty."

(For an outraged history of the Bush family, see Kevin Phillips' new bestseller American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush. A more upbeat account can be found in Richard Ben Cramer's What It Takes. My bemused essay on the return of dynasticism to world affairs, "Revolutionary Nepotism," can be found in the Winter issue of The National Interest.)

The Bushes have always been ultra-ambitious and ultra-competitive, including with each other in their nonstop sports. Constant competition comes with costs, though. The great psychological burden of George W. Bush's life has been his consciousness of his inferiority compared to his father.

The former President is not a great man, but he's a fairly superior individual. When he arrived at Yale in 1945, he had already been the youngest pilot in the wartime Navy. He proceeded to graduate Phi Beta Kappa in only two and half years, yet he had time to also captain the Yale baseball team, be tapped for the ultra-elite Skull and Bones fraternity, and father his first son, George W.

In many ways, the current President reacted to his father in the same ways his hard-drinking twin daughters are now doing to him. The Times of London reported on Friday:

"The US President, once a party animal himself, has little success in reining in their wild behavior, which has included arrests for underage drinking… The Perfect Wife, by Washington Post reporter Ann Gerhart, claims … 'These girls have all the noblesse, and none of the oblige,' she writes. 'They are rich, blessed with intelligence, good looks, trust funds, loving parents, boundless opportunities, freedom from many of life's daily vexing challenges, yet they persist in seeing themselves as victims of Daddy's job.'"

Still, despite the sizable chip on his shoulder George W. has carried over his inadequacy relative to Poppy Bush, the two men have had an ultimately positive dynastic relationship.

The father repeatedly stuck with his often sullen son, finding him new jobs to play at. And the son was there for his dad, helping him in his campaigns. Most notably, on January 1, 1987, George W. stopped drinking to avoid embarrassing his father during his 1988 run for the Presidency.

So it's likely that the dynastic urge burns as brightly in George W. as in the previous generations of Bushes. Unfortunately, his decadent daughters appear to be worthless. In the next generation of Bushes, the one kid who appears to have the good looks, the confidence, and the fire in the belly is his nephew, George P. Bush, the son of Florida governor Jeb Bush.

Indeed, George W., who calls himself "43" and his father "41," has labeled George P. "44."

At only 27 years old, George P. is too young under the Constitution to become the 44th President. But he could be ready to run in another 20 years or so, by which time his uncle's policy of "electing a new people" has altered the voting population in ways favorable to him.

You see, what's distinctive about George P. is that he's Mexican on his mother's side. His father, Jeb, was an Andover student who went on to get a degree in Latin American studies. He spent a semester in central Mexico and fell in love with Columba Garnica Gallo, the daughter of a modest mestizo family.

George P. campaigned in Spanish for his uncle in 2000 like this:

“‘This is a President who represents the diversity of our society, who we can count on to change the Republican Party to represent our views.’" … He told the rally his mother had instilled him the values of Cesar Chavez, the Chicano activist who fought for the rights of migrant farmworkers in the United States. ‘She told me we have to fight for our race, we have to find the leaders who represent us,’ he said in fluent Spanish.’

Reuters, August 2, 2000.

Dubya has loudly proclaimed that his close ties to Mexican-Americans shows that he is a new kind of Republican.

Confirming this, his nephew George P. Bush told reporters, "Our biggest challenge will be to separate my uncle from the rest of the Republican Party."

This, then, could be why George W. has spent so much effort promoting a wedge issue that can only split his own party. He thinks the long-run fate of his dynasty demands a new, improved Republican Party —and a new, debased America.
With friends like these, does Bush need Americans?

George W.'s plan to break down the border between the U.S. and Mexico is not at all out of character for the Bush dynasty. The decades-old connections between the Bush family and Mexico's ruling class and its Texas offshoots have not elicited much attention in the United States. Yet they are highly relevant to understanding both the new President's attitude toward Mexico and exactly what he means when he talks about his outreach to the Hispanic community.

Bill Clinton notoriously had his "FOBs" (Friends of Bill). It's finally time to review some of the "AOtGs" (Amigos of the Georges).

The Bushes are an extremely friendly family. To a remarkable extent, that's the source of their power. They've been acquiring pals for decades.

Needless to say, most of the Bush family outreach toward Mexicans has been directed toward that nation's largely hereditary overclass. Since 1960, the Bushes have become friends with many rich and powerful Mexican oligarchs and their Texan kin and business associates.

When referring to the Mexican overclass, the words "rich" and "powerful" are synonymous. As former New York Times correspondent Alan Riding wrote in his 1984 bestseller Distant Neighbors: A Portrait of the Mexicans, "[P]ublic life could be defined as the abuse of power to achieve wealth and the abuse of wealth to achieve power."

And the Bushes have apparently felt right at home with the life-style of the Mexican rich and famous.

There is, of course, a certain problem with the Bushes' transnational amiability: A significant number of the dynasty's friends south of the border appear to be crooks.

This doesn't necessarily reflect badly on the Bushes—particularly. After all, a large percentage of anybody who is anybody in Mexico is a crook. Still, some of the First Dynasty's favorites have been criminals on a scale so extravagant as to scandalize even the long-suffering citizenry of Mexico.

Take Jorge Diaz Serrano. Jonathan Kwitny reported in a long exposé in Barron's ("The Mexican Connection of George Bush," September 19, 1988, requires Dow Jones' subscription to access):

"Without breathing a word to shareholders in his Houston oil-drilling company, Zapata Off-Shore Co., George Bush in 1960 helped set up another drilling operation employing Mexican front men and seemingly circumventing Mexican law. And he did so in association with Jorge Diaz Serrano, a now-convicted felon who has become a symbol of political corruption in a country with no shortage of contestants for that dubious distinction. In helping to launch … Permargo, Bush and his associates at Zapata teamed up with Diaz Serrano and a Mexican associate in camouflaging the 50% American ownership of Permargo."

George H.W. stood by his old partner:

"’I have high regard for Jorge,’ Bush was quoted as saying in People magazine in 1981. ‘I consider him a friend.’"

Diaz went on to bigger, if not better, things.

"Eventually, Diaz Serrano would take control of Permargo, before moving on to head Pemex, Mexico's government oil monopoly. Shortly after his five-year stint at Pemex, he would begin a five-year stint in jail, having defrauded the Mexican government of $58 million it is still trying to get back…"

Yet, today, Serrano seems like a quaint figure from Mexico's more innocent past. He was a public servant who merely feathered his own nest. Worse was to come.
All this and drugs too

The big difference between the nice clean corruption of the 1970s and today is the new pervasiveness of drug money, and its accompanying violence, among the Mexican elite.

"The problem with Mexico is you don't know who the bad guys are," said Robert Stutman, former head of the federal Drug Enforcement Agency office in New York, in an interview with PBS' Frontline.

Stutman elaborated:

"Both Colombia and Mexico are basically controlled by narcotics traffickers … They got there by very different means. And therefore I look at the countries very differently. I think basically, for years, the Colombian government and Colombian officials have tried to fight the cocaine war. They are simply out-gunned, and out-manned. I look at that country very differently than I look at Mexico, which has been bought off."

One of the few American periodicals to pay much attention these days to the Bushes' amigos is El Andar, a brave little bilingual quarterly based in Santa Cruz, CA. Because most Latino-American publications are preoccupied with either celebrities or ethnic cheerleading, El Andar has the fertile field of cross-border muckraking largely to itself.

And what a vast and odiferous field it is!

The Bush family's most important Mexican friendship was with the Salinas family, whose scion Carlos ruled Mexico from 1988 and 1994, before fleeing to exile in Ireland to avoid being lynched by his furious countrymen. (For the lurid details on this depraved brood, see my article "Mexico's Corrupt White Elite.")

El Andar noted, "Bush Sr. met Carlos Salinas’s father, Raúl Salinas Lozano, back when the latter was Mexico’s commerce secretary. The families’ friendship has continued through the years. Raúl Salinas, the president’s brother, has told investigators that Jeb and Columba Bush joined him three times for vacations at his hacienda Las Mendocinas."

Jeb's host Raul is currently serving 27 years in the slammer for the assassination of PRI chairman Francisco Ruiz Massieu, his ex-brother-in-law.

Dubya's amigos in Texas, however, are not exactly migrant farm workers. As Julie Reynolds, assisted by Victor Almazán and Ana Leonor Rojo, wrote in El Andar:

"It was during those campaign years [of Bush the Elder] that George Junior bonded with many of his Latino allies in the state [of Texas] and made the friends he would later lean on when his political ambitions got into gear. By and large, the Latino alliances Bush touts so loudly these days are not social workers or school teachers, and they are certainly not working-class. Like most in W’s circle, they are Texas heavy-hitters who got rich from their astute blending of business and politics."

In a long, complex El Andar article entitled “LOS AMIGOS DE BUSH: The disturbing ties of some of George W. Bush’s Latino advisors," Reynolds amassed evidence to back her allegation that two of Bush's top Mexican-American backers in Texas are palsy-walsy with individuals linked to Mexico's feared Gulf narco cartel.

As George W. said numerous times in response to questions about illegal aliens, "Family values don't stop at the Rio Grande." (America, of course, does.) Here's one touching example of his assisting an undocumented worker in his struggle with the uncaring INS, as reported by in El Andar by Reynolds and Eduardo Valle of Mexico City's El Universal newspaper:

"In the fall of 1991, George W. Bush asked his father, the President, to 'help out' on behalf of Enrique Fuentes León. … Fuentes León was living in the United States on a tourist visa that was about to expire."

What "family values" had brought this lawyer north of the Rio Grande?

"He had fled Mexico in 1989, after a highly-publicized case in which he was charged with bribing two judges in order to free a wealthy Acapulco businessman convicted of the rape and murder of a young child…"

"He remained free in the U.S. for three more years on an expired tourist visa, even though the Mexican government made an official extradition request on October 21, 1991. … By 1994, he had purchased more than $6 million in San Antonio real estate, and together with Texas publisher Tino Durán made moves to purchase the now-defunct San Antonio Light newspaper…"

When the INS was pestering Fuentes Leon in the early 90s, Duran, who calls himself "a friend and supporter of the Bush family," set up a meeting between the notorious fugitive and the future President of the United States to get him to intercede with the current President of the United States. Duran said:

"’I had sent him [George W.] a letter so he would know what it was all about, so he could decide if he wanted to help," Durán said. ‘And he called me and said, 'Sure, come on down and let’s talk about it.' ‘Enrique and I went down to his office and he called the President." George W. Bush asked President Bush if he could help Durán and 'his friend here.’ Durán says President Bush then asked Durán to send him a letter and said he would direct the information to the State Department."

What happened next?

"Fuentes León … was finally extradited to Mexico after a 1994 arrest for allegedly attempting to bribe an INS agent with $30,000… A courthouse employee said that Fuentes León showed up every day in a $200,000 car, followed by 'around 25' other vehicles…"

How could he afford that? Fuentes León is alleged by El Andar to be the "consigliero" of the Gulf narco cartel.

"Today, Fuentes León is again imprisoned in Mexico. This time it’s for a case in which he is charged in relation to the kidnapping and death of Nellie Campobello, 85, a famous former ballerina whose 13 year-old grave was found last year. The title to Campobello’s house has mysteriously appeared under the name of Fuentes León’s wife."
Conclusion: a special relationship for whom?

Reynolds ended her article, written before the last Presidential election, with these thought-provoking inquiries:

"But the question has to be asked: if some of us far outside of the Bush camp know about those connections, how come Bush didn’t? George W. Bush has made his lust for the Latino vote clear. 'If you say a million, I want you to spend two million. If you say you need four million, I want you to spend eight,' W told Lionel Sosa, head of the Bush Latino media campaigns.

"What is not clear is whom Bush will be willing to consort with to earn that vote. And, if he wins the presidency, what is the true nature of the special relationship he will forge between our two nations, the US and Mexico, in the coming years?"

Last week, we started to find out what Bush thinks (or feels) that special relationship between the U.S. and Mexico should be—and, perhaps, the role that his family might play.

[Steve Sailer [email him], is founder of the Human Biodiversity Institute and movie critic for The American Conservative. His website www.iSteve.com features site-exclusive commentaries.]
 
"Mexico is not going to bear, it is not going to permit, and it will not allow a stupid thing like this wall," Derbez said.
That sounds real close to a Declaration of War. Interfering with another countries internal policies is certainly cause.


Oneshooter
Livin in TEXAS
 
I'd bet moby bucks that illegal Mexicans have killed a lot more Americans than any of Saddam's boys did. Ya gotta wonder...
Biker
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top