National Guard Commander in Arizona to Testify About Border Confrontation...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Davo

Member
Joined
May 23, 2005
Messages
1,126
Location
Riverside County, California
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,248124,00.html

PHOENIX — "Stop Stonewalling."

That's the warning from Arizona lawmakers hoping to find out what really happened earlier this month when four Tennessee National Guardsmen reportedly retreated when confronted by armed illegal immigrants along the border south of Tucson.
So far, Guard and U.S. Border Patrol officials have refused to disclose exactly what happened Jan. 3 when gunmen assaulted a Guard lookout post near Sasabe, Ariz. They declined requests from FOX News for copies of incident reports and transcripts of interviews with the men involved.
"Unfortunately, we do not have a report to provide," said Michael Friel, the Border Patrol's chief spokesman in Washington.On Monday, Maj. Gen. David Rataczak will appear before the Arizona House Homeland Security Committee to testify about the encounter.
"What are they here for if they are going to retreat from people with automatic weapons?" asked Committee Chairman Warde Nichols, who said the incident may send the message that the National Guard will retreat if faced with armed individuals. "It is not in the best interest of Arizona or U.S. border security," he added.
Rep. Steve Gallardo, a Democrat on the committee, said he believed immigration hard-liners would use Rataczak's appearance to push their agenda.
"They are going to try and embarrass him. They are going to fail," Gallardo said.
The incident happened at night, about a quarter mile north of the U.S. border with Mexico. A spokesman for the Arizona National Guard said an undetermined number of armed men approached an E.I.T., or Entry Identification Team, from Tennessee. Dozens of these mobile lookout posts are set up along the border, several are near Sasabe, a popular drug corridor. An E.I.T. is typically manned by four Guard soldiers equipped with radios, night vision and other surveillance gear.
Under existing rules of force signed by the Department of Defense and border state governors, soldiers are not supposed to stop, arrest, or shoot armed illegal immigrants. They are instructed only to look, listen and report their location to the Border Patrol.
"We don't apprehend," said Maj. Paul Aguirre, a spokesman for the Arizona National Guard. "We don't detain. We don't transport."
For that reason, critics say, it is inaccurate to say the National Guard is protecting the border.
While Guard spokesman Paul Aguirre called the encounter a "non-incident," U.S. Border Patrol sources in Tucson familiar with the investigation say something entirely different. They describe a tense, armed confrontation, with both sides lifting their assault rifles to shoulder height.
The sources say 12 men assaulted the Guard position, dressed in black tactical vests and khaki military style fatigues. The unit split into two groups as it approached, with eight men in front and two men flanking the Guardsmen on each side. One of the gunmen came within 35 feet of the observation site, according to investigators' summaries. Surrounded, outmanned and outgunned, the four Guardsmen made a "tactical retreat" to their Humvee and called the Border Patrol, the sources said.
The Border Patrol tracked the armed men back to the border but could not locate them. No shots were fired.
Guard spokesman Aguirre objected to characterizations of the withdrawal as a retreat, saying the soldiers did not run from their post and were not overrun.
The troops monitored the situation, never lost contact with the gunmen and moved to another site to avoid an engagement, Aguirre said.
Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano, National Guard officials and some state lawmakers defended the decision to call in the Border Patrol. The governor's office has said the rules allow Guard members to use force when they believe they face an imminent threat and all other means are exhausted.
"I don't think that it's up to the committee to negotiate the rules of engagement," Napolitano said. "Those rules of engagement were negotiated with the National Guard at the federal level."
Border agents interviewed over the weekend believe the group was military trained, and were likely ex-Mexican special forces working for the drug cartels or a rival cartel 'rip-off' squad that steals drug shipments once they've crossed the border.
Initial reports suggested he Guardsmen were unarmed. However, Border Patrol spokesman Gustavo Soto said the teams "had rifles and ammunition from Day One."
That is true for the E.I.T. teams, but local agents say most Guardsmen involved with Operation Jump Start — those resurfacing roads and building fences — are not armed because officials "don't want an incident."
"The stories we've gotten from the National Guard, quite frankly, have changed," said lawmaker Nichols. "What happened that day? Is this isolated incident? Does it happen often armed men come across border in Kevlar vests moving in tactical formation and come within 30 feet of a National Guard post? We need to know."
The four Tennessee Guardsmen involved in the "tactical retreat," or redeployment, will be honored in Tucson Monday in a closed ceremony. An Arizona Guard spokeswoman refused to identify the medal or ribbon or commendation being given out, and said the press was not invited.
The troops were among the 6,400 National Guard members sent to the four southern border states to support immigration agents, and leave the agents with more time to catch illegal immigrants.
The support duties include monitoring border points, assisting with cargo inspection and operating surveillance cameras.
Heres the video link...http://www.foxnews.com/video2/playe...Scandal?&Border Scandal?&US&-1&News&180&&&new

So these guys had assualt rifles, black tactical vests, and were using military tactics...dosent sound rag tag.
 
No one fears a dog with no teeth. Again, this goes up to the top...*all the way*.
Bush is a traitor and should be impeached for betraying this country by aiding and encouraging this invasion, armed or otherwise.
I'm sickened...

Biker
 
Davo you must know that the essence of your article is intrinsically insulting. Don't believe me? Just wait a few hours for the usuals to come tell you it's just rednecks, who probably moved to the border just for this reason, exaggerating it all for an excuse to go shoot 'imgrints' like the dumb racists they are. To see who the usuals are just re-read the thread this follows on...
 
Nation-build abroad, nation-destroy at home.

While we struggle to quell "sectarian violence" in Iraq we appear to be oblivious of the social unrest brewing right here at home. I guess Mr. Bush thinks all is well on the plantation? He'd better think again.
 
Yeah I remember that thread well, one of the best here in a while actually.
This HAS to go up to the top, US Attorney General has stated anyone who would stop our open border is racist. Arnold (the governator) has said the same thing.
Thing is this flow is NOT all migrant farm workers, there are armed paramilitary groups that freely infiltrate the US border on a routine basis. Assualt rifles, and machine guns, the whole deal. This happens an hour's drive south of me. Regardless of everyone's views on illegal immigration, I see this as a threat that must be contained.
 
Why would troops be honored with a robbon, medal, or any other such thing for retreating? Call it what you will, retreat in the face of superior forces to preserve your own until able to counterattack is a militarily sound strategy, but the counterattcking never took place. This simply became retreat.
 
Could be he'd like to institute the same rules that El Presidente did in the first Civil War.

Biker
 
We need border control to control guns.

Even the liberals can support that. :D
 
What what what

The sources say 12 men assaulted the Guard position, dressed in black tactical vests and khaki military style fatigues.

They are not allowed to fire in defence of their country, or themselves?

Wisky... Tango... Foxtrot...:banghead:
 
If the rules of engagement for the Guard specify "Run Away!" (insert Monty Python impression here) as the appropriate response to an armed assault by foreign invaders... I am just speechless. :what: Isn't it called the "National Guard" at least partly because it, um, guards the nation?

Yep:
http://www.ngb.army.mil/features/homelanddefense/index.html

This is not to knock the Guard at all, but if this is a true account of what happened, the rules that prevented those four Guardsmen from engaging the bad guys need to be changed. How have things come to this point? :banghead: WWTRD? (What Would Teddy Roosevelt Do?) And who's to say that the bad guys weren't OTM (Other Than Mexican) with something more sinister on their agenda than intimidating the Guard and protecting their dope-running overlords?

OK so this is all somewhat off-topic for a gun board, so to bring it back on-topic, may I humbly suggest that the appropriate response to a group of armed and organized foreign invaders assaulting an American observation post on American soil involves at least one, and preferably several, of John Moses Browning's Ma Deuces being fired by said Americans in the general direction (insert other Monty Python impression here) of said invaders? Nothing says "Homeland Defense" like a belt-fed .50.
 
This is not to knock the Guard at all, but if this is a true account of what happened, the rules that prevented those four Guardsmen from engaging the bad guys need to be changed. How have things come to this point?

No one blames the Guard.

We know who and what is behind this.

We have an autocrat in the White House who refuses to listen to the people who put him in office. Count me in that number: I voted for the man twice, regretfully. Bush needs to be loudly called out on this issue and forced to answer hard questions. He has no right to defy the will of the people. No one elected him dictator-for-life; he works for us, a civil servant. I for one am thoroughly fed up with the man's hubris. This is still a Republic last time I checked.
 
Not only are the tactics unsound, but it would appear they would have been outgunned even if they were allowed to engage. I seriously doubt the national guard carries grenades or rpgs or can call in air support. Likely they are only armed with thier rifles and a small amount of ammo for them.

A lot of the special forces in Mexico were trained by American special forces. Ironicly much of the training given is to help them be more capable against the cartels. Yet because they have the best training in the land they become the most valuable to the cartels. Many of the fire teams for the cartels are special forces, or federales with special forces training, or individuals trained by people that recieved such training, often provided by the US. These are not rag tag groups running around in a cluster, they are trained at least as good as and likely better than the personal we put on the border in combat. They also are likely to have prior combat experience against similar members of other cartels and even the Mexican police in thier own country.

So would four national guardsmen with a couple rifles and limited ammo even been capable of taking on 12 men at least a portion of whom are likely special forces trained commandos, wearing body armor, and carrying similar weapons?
 
Remember we do not KNOW what happened only what the media reported so it could be vastly different form reality.

MAYBE, no gunfire was exchanged becasue the "assault team" was US soldiers (or whatever) and they happened upon the National Guard Site (I know they should have known they were there but, fubar happens)?

Maybe they were the good guys doing a little hunting of their own? WHo knows?

We don't know what really happened? Maybe the medal or whatever the NG receive is for not shooting?
 
Zoogster you bring up a good point. The men I have met guarding are border struck me above all else as unimpressive. The NG had non-matching uniforms, old vehicles, and thier observation equipment was literally 50 year old navy equipment...servicable but not impressive. We had gen 3 NVG's, they didnt. Many werent armed, we were. Ive seen 4 types of air support so far. The NG has a hercules that will occasionally fly the border (literally right along it), I have seen the county sherrifs bird, our chapter of the Minute men have a guy in a cessna thats overhead sometimes, we have commo with him, and Ive seen blacked out blackhawks at night (through NVG's).
The BP is not much better. Some have rifles, but the shotgun and handgun are more common. The typical team on the border is 2 men, so they would not be able to put up much of a fight even with state of the art gear.
Fact is that it would be fairly straight forward for a small group of armed militants such as those mentioned to overcome wither BP or NG, do what they need to do (sneak drugs across), and be safe on the other side before we can even get backup to our guys (first in would likley be a couple 20 year olds in a BP bronco with the previously mentioned weapons). Our guys expect to be on their own for up to 45 minutes after sending out a distress call-takes time to get vehicles to where they need to be.
There is a limbo on our border, its not war, its not peace.
 
So, have they caught who did this? How do we know that they perps were from Mexico? Maybe A.P.s from some anti-immigration group? (Since we don't know, just as likely???).

As members of the gun culture, don't we know that the border always been violent? How is this not yet another money grab by Sun Belt states?

Will these hearings be televised on the 'net?
 
his HAS to go up to the top, US Attorney General has stated anyone who would stop our open border is racist. Arnold (the governator) has said the same thing.

Yeah, but not until after he'd won the Republican primary... :fire:
 
When the dam of tolerance breaks, there is going to be a serious ass kicking delivered to mehiko, and none too soon. They have been a hostile neighbor far too long.
 
When the dam of tolerance breaks, there is going to be a serious ass kicking delivered to mehiko, and none too soon. They have been a hostile neighbor far too long.

Unfortunately, you'll have to go through Washington DC to deliver that ass-kicking. Mexico is Someone's Pet.
 
The last border patrol to shoot an illegal are now in a U.S. jail and being sued by the illegal. In return for the illegals testimony I believe the charges were dropped for the hundreds of pounds of weed he was transporting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top