First of let me say I'm not a firearms instructor, I don't claim to be an expert. Nor have I been through a firearms course. I was an USMC infantryman(0311) from 04-08. Which is solely where I was trained in the use of firearms and other weapons. I only own 1 pistol and get to the range once a month if I'm lucky.
That being said let me show you where I am coming from(please bear with me). I am a martial artist. Ive been a martial artist since I was 6, I'm 23 now. For the last 5-6 years I've been training in MMA styles BJJ, Muay Thai, Wrestling, Boxing. I also trained in MCMAP, which is similar to Krav Maga, and was a Brown Belt instructor in it. Now there is a big issue in the Martial arts community about MMA being too sport oriented for combat because of the rules in place for competition. That being said I(and many others) believe someone who trains MMA has an edge in an unarmed scenario. This isn't because of the realism of MMA vs the realism of Krav Maga. I don't think any MMA/BJJ/Muay Thai guy is going to argue Krav and like arts offer more realism in "self defense training". The edge MMA fighters have on everyone else is how oriented the training is to sparring, and full contact fighting. Basically most MMA forces you to fight or spar full contact in some capacity at least a couple times a week. Thus not only do you have to condition yourself for such an exercise, but get a lot of experience in something as close as you can safely come to simulating an actual fight.
Once again, as I'm sure there are Krav Maga or TMA proponents on here. I'm not insulting it. I actually believe Krav to be the best option in self defense for someone who wants to learn to defend themselves fast, and has no interest in starting Martial arts as a hobby. MMA is a time/money sink to say the least. I also don't hate TMA's. As far as hobbies go I think TMA's offer an acceptable level of self defense while offering an activity rich in history. Furthermore I'd prefer this thread not devolve into a my Martial Art is better than yours argument. We can do that on numerous other websites.
On to the point. In my day dreaming I have come to the conclusion that paintball is the closest you can come to "full contact shooting". While watching paintball competition on ESPN I saw them use techniques I learned in the Marine Corps. They knew how to bound, rush, pop corners, and pie at least. While I wouldn't say paintballing would directly translate into shooting like MMA translates in unarmed combat(after all a Krav practioners fist is the same as a MMA fighters fist, the same can not be said of a paintball gun to an actual firearm). It does seem paintballing would be an excellent exercise to add to one training regime. Similar to the way I'm told Krav schools have full contact sparring and grappling every once in a while. No one is saying to go join a paintball league. But I can't see how it would hurt...
What are some opinions on this? I trust more in your expertise on the subject than my own. Because, as stated I'm not a firearm tactics expert in any way, shape, or form. Do you think occasionally going paint balling would be a good addition to tactical firearms training, in the same vein sparring is to Martial Arts? Why, or why not?
**I understand Sim rounds would probably be a better option, but they are very expensive and certain people might have problems with it depending on where you would practice. For instance I doubt a paintball facility would let you use a AR15 with a sim round barrel, and that combined with the price would affect the amount of practice you could engage in.**
Sorry for the rant,
Adam
That being said let me show you where I am coming from(please bear with me). I am a martial artist. Ive been a martial artist since I was 6, I'm 23 now. For the last 5-6 years I've been training in MMA styles BJJ, Muay Thai, Wrestling, Boxing. I also trained in MCMAP, which is similar to Krav Maga, and was a Brown Belt instructor in it. Now there is a big issue in the Martial arts community about MMA being too sport oriented for combat because of the rules in place for competition. That being said I(and many others) believe someone who trains MMA has an edge in an unarmed scenario. This isn't because of the realism of MMA vs the realism of Krav Maga. I don't think any MMA/BJJ/Muay Thai guy is going to argue Krav and like arts offer more realism in "self defense training". The edge MMA fighters have on everyone else is how oriented the training is to sparring, and full contact fighting. Basically most MMA forces you to fight or spar full contact in some capacity at least a couple times a week. Thus not only do you have to condition yourself for such an exercise, but get a lot of experience in something as close as you can safely come to simulating an actual fight.
Once again, as I'm sure there are Krav Maga or TMA proponents on here. I'm not insulting it. I actually believe Krav to be the best option in self defense for someone who wants to learn to defend themselves fast, and has no interest in starting Martial arts as a hobby. MMA is a time/money sink to say the least. I also don't hate TMA's. As far as hobbies go I think TMA's offer an acceptable level of self defense while offering an activity rich in history. Furthermore I'd prefer this thread not devolve into a my Martial Art is better than yours argument. We can do that on numerous other websites.
On to the point. In my day dreaming I have come to the conclusion that paintball is the closest you can come to "full contact shooting". While watching paintball competition on ESPN I saw them use techniques I learned in the Marine Corps. They knew how to bound, rush, pop corners, and pie at least. While I wouldn't say paintballing would directly translate into shooting like MMA translates in unarmed combat(after all a Krav practioners fist is the same as a MMA fighters fist, the same can not be said of a paintball gun to an actual firearm). It does seem paintballing would be an excellent exercise to add to one training regime. Similar to the way I'm told Krav schools have full contact sparring and grappling every once in a while. No one is saying to go join a paintball league. But I can't see how it would hurt...
What are some opinions on this? I trust more in your expertise on the subject than my own. Because, as stated I'm not a firearm tactics expert in any way, shape, or form. Do you think occasionally going paint balling would be a good addition to tactical firearms training, in the same vein sparring is to Martial Arts? Why, or why not?
**I understand Sim rounds would probably be a better option, but they are very expensive and certain people might have problems with it depending on where you would practice. For instance I doubt a paintball facility would let you use a AR15 with a sim round barrel, and that combined with the price would affect the amount of practice you could engage in.**
Sorry for the rant,
Adam
Last edited: