sam59 said:
I find it funny how quite a few have an opinion on how to do it better or the current way is crap etc.... but i bet you have not gone to your school and suggested anything different. There is so much misinformation in this entire thread it's scary.
I have spoken with the school, and the police department.
For the benefit of whoever asked (after I had said I was not in education), no I am not in education. I am an architect who writes specifications for school security. They are building a huge addition to the high school in my town, and I have reviewed my concerns with both the police department and the school administration, and sent my comments in writing to the Board of Education.
First, let me make clear that references to "lockdown" do not mean that anyone is locked into a classroom. That's not the way the locks work. The doors will be locked on the corridor side but, by law (fire codes) the knob on the inside of the room must always be capable of opening the door, even if the hallway side is locked. The lock manufacturers now have a new lock type (called a "function") for "Classroom Security" locks. The lock has a key slot on each side. On the hallway side, as always, the teacher needs a key to unlock the door, and a key to lock it.
The old classroom locks had no key slot on the inside. The new security locks do. The purpose is obvious (I hope): because most classroom doors swing out into the hall (for fire code reasons), a teacher would have to go out into the corridor to lock the door. Not a good idea if there's a shooter in the corridor. The new function allows them to lock the door from inside, without having to go into the corridor. But I stress that the knob (or lever, probably) on the inside can still open the door if escape should become necessary.
I agree about glass. One of my comments regarding the proposed addition to my town's high school is that most of the new classrooms will have security locks, and LARGE glass sidelights right next to the doors. I pointed out to the administration and to the deputy chief of police (who heads the school response team) the insanity of locking a door and leaving a window big enough to walk through if a shooter decides to take it out. Fortunately, the existing classrooms do NOT have sidelights.
Those doors, by the way, are heavy. Maybe we should ask that guy at the Box 'o Truth to try shooting through some solid-core doors. They are 1-3/4" of high-density particle board. I;m sure they won't stop a .50 cal bullet from a Barrett, but if they won't stop a handgun round I expect they'll take a lot of the steam off it. I'm more concerned about a shooter firing through the walls around the doors, but he'd be shooting blind at that point so you have to hope that psychologically he won't "see" a target, so won't recognize that he has a target-rich environment behind those lockers.
Yes, I have given this much serious consideration over a period of several years, because it's my job, and I have discussed it with the first responders. I firmly believe that 99% of the time, just like 99% of the time you're safer if you DO wear seatbelts, the kids will be safer staying in the classrooms. The response team will establish communication from a central point, and if/when a room or wing is safe enough to evacuate, they will order the kids out. Telling your kids to run on their own, counter to what the response team is expecting, is IMHO very stupid.