scaatylobo
Member
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/p...ot-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html
The scotus has ruled that we,the American people are NOT entitled to protection from the police.
I am not saying that as a retired LEO,I and all I worked with did not risk life and limb to get to any call.
I am saying that if you have a plan to only call 911 to save your bacon ---- and they do not get there in time,your on your own.
NO RIGHT TO SUE, and no "right" to police protection.
My real point is WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY = why does not the N.R.A., & C.C.F.T.R.T.K.&.B.A, & 2nd Amendment foundation, & all the rest of the "pro gun" movement make this a single point that is yelled from the rooftops ?.
I just have to believe that all citizens would be really spot on with the RIGHT to bear arms if they actually knew this LEGAL FACT.
The scotus has ruled that we,the American people are NOT entitled to protection from the police.
I am not saying that as a retired LEO,I and all I worked with did not risk life and limb to get to any call.
I am saying that if you have a plan to only call 911 to save your bacon ---- and they do not get there in time,your on your own.
NO RIGHT TO SUE, and no "right" to police protection.
My real point is WHY IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY = why does not the N.R.A., & C.C.F.T.R.T.K.&.B.A, & 2nd Amendment foundation, & all the rest of the "pro gun" movement make this a single point that is yelled from the rooftops ?.
I just have to believe that all citizens would be really spot on with the RIGHT to bear arms if they actually knew this LEGAL FACT.
Last edited: