Sigs are better than Glocks !

Status
Not open for further replies.
"That's 'cause most Sig owners rarely shoot! Sig owners are so busy picking out fancy grips and saving for expensive "upgrades" to bring their pistols up to a normal standard (SRT, etc.) that they never really go shooting..."

Actually I shoot my 1911's more than my Sigs :neener:
 
Plus Sigs have that second hammer strike capability on misfires that Glocks don't have.
I love the triggers on Sigs too !
 
this thread is headed south quick. I expect it to get locked here in a while.

lets make EVERYBODY mad by posting this thread!

might as well put the brady buttbunch on here and let them have full control of the website. lets just do that while we are at it making everybody mad. it'll be great!!
 
excuse me while i get the popcorn

and a cold brew !!!
Thank God i'm in my Lazy Boy recliner ! :D
 
Like i always say .....

Glocks are " Hummers " !
Sigs are " Ferraris " ! :cool:
 
Yep, Hummer and Ferrari....

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • pistols.jpg
    pistols.jpg
    51.6 KB · Views: 331
This about sums it all up .....

Police Depts. use Glocks.
Elite Teams use Sigs. ;)
 
Hey DRYHUMOR !

" Beauty and the Beast " ! LOL !! :D


[ Beauty is the " best " !! ]
 
I had a 220 that I did not like at all. I did not get the feeling of "quality" when I held it. It just felt cheap. Sold it cheap too. Just not a sig fan, although, I do like the P6/225.
 
I have a buddy that floats all around the world from craphole to craphole, most of the time all they carry are Sigs. And yes, LEO usually has glocks

I heard good and bad about both to fair about it, both run equally well when clean, with decent ammo. As for the levers and what not on the Sig, just any pc of equipment, you learn it and get used to it.

The Glock (.40) in that pic I have run crap ammo through it. In the course of 2 magazines I had 8 or 9 FTF and a couple of stovepipes. They aren't "wonder pistols" as some would believe, they do have limitations.

My other Sig a 229SCT, I've run very dirty with 3 or 4 different types of ammo, maybe a 300 plus round session, no issues. That doesn't mean I couldn't make it fail in some way. I've never had any crap 9mm ammo to test the theory.
 
Hi Pigaloo....

it must be that aluminum frame model.
My P220 ST is all Stainless steel.
It weighs a Ton but i like it that way because it keeps the recoil tamned a bit.
Plus my model has a better updated grip on it than the older " Classic " P220 models.
 
I read reports occassionaly about how Glocks have FTF and FTE problems.
But i have NEVER read any posts about ANY Sigs having these problems !
Click to expand...
I'd say that in some ways SIGs are better than Glocks, however your methodology in arriving at your conclusion is flawed.

In order to make an accurate assessment using the method you used you would AT LEAST need to know the following.

1. How many SIG owners/shooters are there on this forum compared to Glock owners/shooters? That is, are there the same number of Glock owners/shooters posting on THR as there are SIG owners/shooters? If there are a lot more Glock owners/shooters then one would naturally expect to see a lot more Glock problems reported even if the problem rate is the same between the two guns.

2. Are all the Glock problems posted accurate reports?

3. Is a typical Glock problem just as likely (more likely/less likely) to be reported as a typical SIG problem? That is, given X Glock problems and the same number of SIG problems will we see more, less or the same number of problem reports posted for each gun?
 
Happy New Year JohnKSa

Yes ! I agree with you !

It's quite simple actually !

The variables should be equally balanced to come to the sum of the total.
There could be a lenghthly check of past Glock and Sig posters.I understand your reasoning also in that maybe Glock posters are maybe more numerous.And maybe alot of Sig. owners are just not posting as much.There does exist are friendly rivalry between both fans of these legendary pistols.
I assume that those that are actually posting are being truthful and accurate.
It's almost like some people are also saying that there exist a certain " Status Symbol " with each brand. That Sig owners admire their pistols more,while Glock shooters are more pragmatic and "do " actually shoot alot and practice more !
 
The only things i see in a Sig that i MIGHT like to see in a glock is the trigger pull and maybe the full metal body
 
"...I'd take my German Sig over any Glock any day .."
Oh yeah well I'll take my Austrian Gluck over your German anyday! 8 ^ O .
But really who cares??? Can't we all just get along??? 8 ^ )
 
Both exceptional weapons!

I've carried both a Glock 19, 23 and a Sig 239, never had any of them fail. I do like the Glock trigger, being the same all the time, never warmed up to the Sig DA-SA. I can't say anthing good about the Sig slide catch location. They put it right where I grip the thing, so the slide never locked back on it till I figured out I was holding it in. The Sig was more accurate, but lacked capacity compared to the same size Glock. The Sig definatly carried better with the perfect grip geometry, but it was heavier than my G23. I now carry a Kimber UCII, and couldnt be happier:cool:
 
Last edited:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

W
  • Locked
trade my glock?!?
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
dairycreek
D
G
  • Locked
GLOCK 357's vs. Springfield XD 357's !
Replies
4
Views
2K
possum
P
A
  • Locked
glock or h&k or sig or 1911?
Replies
13
Views
1K
photo_guy
P
omega5
  • Locked
Glock M33
Replies
3
Views
612
Capstone
C
4
  • Locked
Glock or Sig?
2 3 4
Replies
96
Views
4K
USMCDK
U
Back
Top