.455_Hunter
Member
I like the P290RS and the 3914DAO- both out if print for trendier designs, but both top notch.
Wow! I paid $250 for a brand-new Gen 1 when the Gen 2s came out. Who knew it was a good investment?Nah, used original shields are going up to $300.
Yeah, but that was years ago and pre covid. The cheapest I’ve seen new old stock shield 1.0 going for during Covid was $350 for a bunch of .40 shields at my LGS. Look on Gunbroker.Wow! I paid $250 for a brand-new Gen 1 when the Gen 2s came out. Who knew it was a good investment?
Not agreeing with the other poster, nor am I saying that SCCY and Taurus can’t fit the bill for useable, affordable firearms. In no way though are they a “top tier” manufacture that just doesn’t have a gov contract, nor the same average quality as the S&W level brands.Could you say that in English? My gibberish is kinda rusty.
Hasty Generalization fallacy.
Means nothing. There are plenty of top tier manufacturers who don't have juicy military or law enforcement contracts either.
Oh, so I guess Tauri aren't all "garbage."
(How y'all like that Latinate plural?)
No one is pretending that Taurus, KelTec and SCCY have the same fit, finish and attention to detail as some of the higher end brand, but that hardly makes them either "garbage" or "dangerous."
On the other hand, S&W and Colt (among others) have produced some real turds as well.
Not agreeing with the other poster, nor am I saying that SCCY and Taurus can’t fit the bill for useable, affordable firearms. In no way though are they a “top tier” manufacture that just doesn’t have a gov contract, nor the same average quality as the S&W level brands.
Your argumentation points implied the opposite on both counts, even with moderating statements. For ex, the point about gov contracts.I did not say SCCY and Taurus are top tier manufacturers. I said "there are plenty of top tier manufacturers who don't have juicy military or law enforcement contracts either."
I also went on to say "no one is pretending that Taurus, KelTec and SCCY have the same fit, finish and attention to detail as some of the higher end brands, but that hardly makes them either "garbage" or "dangerous."
Dang. Is it that hard to understand?
name one police or military branch that utilizes any of the above?[sic]
One can only speak from personal experiences mate, and I have mine with a couple of the weapons you referenced.. it’s my opinion the versions I had wereCould you say that in English? My gibberish is kinda rusty.
Hasty Generalization fallacy.
Means nothing. There are plenty of top tier manufacturers who don't have juicy military or law enforcement contracts either.
Oh, so I guess Tauri aren't all "garbage."
(How y'all like that Latinate plural?)
No one is pretending that Taurus, KelTec and SCCY have the same fit, finish and attention to detail as some of the higher end brand, but that hardly makes them either "garbage" or "dangerous."
On the other hand, S&W and Colt (among others) have produced some real turds as well.
Okay..Not to someone with a working command of the English language they didn't.
I can't afford cheap orangies ... (See what I did there? )I cannot afford cheap applies