I know there are more than a few, including:
Are they worth it? I think the AR-7 makes the most sense in terms of compact storage, weight, and portability, but it probably doesn't shoot as well as the others from what I've read. My thought is that if it doesn't compact as much as the AR-7 and you have to carry two big pieces, why not just carry a full sized, non-takedown, quality 22 rifle? I know takedown may make portability easier, but how small does it need to take down to make it worth it over just slinging a nice .22 LR rifle over your shoulder?
The other cool thing about the Browning having an integrated tubular magazine means that you don't have to carry around mags, but reloading is slower.
I guess I'm asking in terms of a "survival" rifle (e.g. portable, light, and able to take small game, etc.). A scope would obviously make shooting easier and more accurate, but adds weight and takes up space.
Thoughts?
- Ruger 10/22 Takedown
- Marlin Papoose
- Henry AR-7
- Browning SA-22
Are they worth it? I think the AR-7 makes the most sense in terms of compact storage, weight, and portability, but it probably doesn't shoot as well as the others from what I've read. My thought is that if it doesn't compact as much as the AR-7 and you have to carry two big pieces, why not just carry a full sized, non-takedown, quality 22 rifle? I know takedown may make portability easier, but how small does it need to take down to make it worth it over just slinging a nice .22 LR rifle over your shoulder?
The other cool thing about the Browning having an integrated tubular magazine means that you don't have to carry around mags, but reloading is slower.
I guess I'm asking in terms of a "survival" rifle (e.g. portable, light, and able to take small game, etc.). A scope would obviously make shooting easier and more accurate, but adds weight and takes up space.
Thoughts?