rodinal220
Member
Im kinda partial to my Remington No#4 Rolling Block and my 1915 Stevens Favorite.
If you are looking for an absolute minimum in size and weight (perhaps for backpacking or canoe camping) and are willing to sacrifice some "shootability" I would go with the Papoose or the AR-7. If you are just looking for something a bit easier to pack and store (car/truck/RV/boat) then the 10/22 TD or the SA-22 would get my nod. They are a bit heavier and bulkier than the previous suggestions, but IMO feel more like "real" rifles once assembled.I guess I'm asking in terms of a "survival" rifle (e.g. portable, light, and able to take small game, etc.). A scope would obviously make shooting easier and more accurate, but adds weight and takes up space.
SKILCZ said:I really like that Marlin setup with the rounds contained in the stock. Cool idea. Only thing I notice is that the scope is receiver mounted, which makes me wonder if it will hold zero as well after take down as the Browning or Norinco, where the scope goes with the barrel.
I do understand the thinking behind having a rifle w/o magazines for survival b/c if you lose the magazine, you are out of luck other than maybe feeding single rounds into the chamber. Sounds like the Norinco may be good enough to avoid paying so much more for the Browning.
. . . Ruger Charger. I know the Charger isnt a rifle, but dont tell it that. It thinks it is...