I hope my comment fits within the thread. I'm a pretty pedestrian shooter compared to some on these forums. Honestly, the handguns I most enjoy acquiring and shooting are single-action revolvers. There was a time I was more into double-action revolvers and I have always had some semi-autos but they have not been my focus and in the beginning they were DA/SA or DAO hammer-fired semi-autos and eventually SA hammer-fired autos, i.e., the Browning Hi-Power. To make a long story a bit shorter, I recently decided I needed to to consider ceasing running against the wind and take a closer look at the benefits of modern striker-fired autos. I have owned them in the past but never kept one. Looking at a lot of history, information, reviews, schematics, guns at the store, etc. etc. I gradually came to believe at this point I am more comfortable with a striker that is not fully or 98% pre-cocked. That might change because I used to be queasy about cocked and locked, too. But, for now that's how I feel. That took some nice pistols off the top of my list, including the Smith and Wesson, the new Ruger American( which I really like), and the Sig 320. Looking at everything from design, to track record, to safety, to durability, to parts availability, etc, etc., I decided that the granddaddy of them all is still the best overall choice for me and that meant the Glock 17/19. I bought a Glock 19 Gen 4 right Just before this tempest erupted. I am not a Glock fanboy but I am happy with my choice and very pleased with the pistol and quite confident that it will not go off unintended if I don't pull the trigger. I hope Sig gets it squared away because I do have a couple Sig pistols and like them very much.