u.s. troops like ak's?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 6, 2003
Messages
2,076
Location
Bemidji, MN
U.S. Troops Use Confiscated Iraqi AK-47s
Sun Aug 24, 2:15 PM ET

By ANDREW ENGLAND, Associated Press Writer

BAQOUBA, Iraq - An American soldier stands at the side of an Iraqi highway, puts his AK-47 on fully automatic and pulls the trigger.



Within seconds the assault rifle has blasted out 30 rounds. Puffs of dust dance in the air as the bullets smack into the scrubland dirt. Test fire complete.


U.S. troops in Iraq (news - web sites) may not have found weapons of mass destruction, but they're certainly getting their hands on the country's stock of Kalashnikovs — and, they say, they need them.


The soldiers based around Baqouba are from an armor battalion, which means they have tanks, Humvees and armored personnel carriers. But they are short on rifles.


A four-man tank crew is issued two M4 assault rifles and four 9mm pistols, relying mostly on the tank's firepower for protection.


But now they are engaged in guerrilla warfare, patrolling narrow roads and goat trails where tanks are less effective. Troops often find themselves dismounting to patrol in smaller vehicles, making rifles essential.


"We just do not have enough rifles to equip all of our soldiers. So in certain circumstances we allow soldiers to have an AK-47. They have to demonstrate some proficiency with the weapon ... demonstrate an ability to use it," said Lt. Col. Mark Young, commander of the 3rd Battalion, 67th Armor Regiment, 4th Infantry Division.


"Normally an armor battalion is fighting from its tanks. Well, we are not fighting from our tanks right now," Young said. "We are certainly capable of performing the missions that we have been assigned, there's no issue with that, but we do find ourselves somewhat challenged."


In Humvees, on tanks — but never openly on base — U.S. soldiers are carrying the Cold War-era weapon, first developed in the Soviet Union but now mass produced around the world.


The AK is favored by many of the world's fighters, from child soldiers in Africa to rebel movements around the world, because it is light, durable and known to jam less frequently.


Now U.S. troops who have picked up AKs on raids or confiscated them at checkpoints are putting the rifles to use — and they like what they see.


Some complain that standard U.S. military M16 and M4 rifles jam too easily in Iraq's dusty environment. Many say the AK has better "knockdown" power and can kill with fewer shots.


"The kind of war we are in now ... you want to be able to stop the enemy quick," said Sgt. 1st Class Tracy S. McCarson of Newport News, Va., an army scout, who carries an AK in his Humvee.


Some troops say the AK is easier to maintain and a better close-quarters weapon. Also, it has "some psychological affect on the enemy when you fire back on them with their own weapons," McCarson said.


Most U.S. soldiers agree the M16 and the M4 — a newer, shorter version of the M16 that has been used by American troops since the 1960s — is better for long distance, precision shooting.


But around Baqouba, troops are finding themselves attacked by assailants hidden deep in date palm groves. Or they are raiding houses, taking on enemies at close-quarters.


Two weeks ago, Sgt. Sam Bailey of Cedar Falls, Iowa, was in a Humvee when a patrol came under rocket-propelled grenade and heavy machine gun fire. It was dark, the road narrow. On one side, there was a mud wall and palms trees, on the other a canal surrounded by tall grass.





Bailey, who couldn't see who was firing, had an AK-47 on his lap and his M4 up front. The choice was simple.

"I put the AK on auto and started spraying," Bailey said.

Some soldiers also say it's easier to get ammo for the AK — they can pick it up on any raid or from any confiscated weapon.

"It's plentiful," said Sgt. Eric Harmon, a tanker who has a full 75-round drum, five 30-round magazines, plus 200-300 rounds in boxes for his AK. He has about 120 rounds for his M16.

Young doesn't carry an AK but has fired one. He's considered banning his troops from carrying AKs, but hasn't yet because "if I take the AK away from some of the soldiers, then they will not have a rifle to carry with them."

Staff Sgt. Michael Perez, a tanker, said he would take anything over his standard issue 9mm pistol when he's out of his tank.

And the AK's durability has impressed him.

"They say you can probably drop this in the water and leave it overnight, pull it out in the morning, put in a magazine and it will work," Perez said.



I just found this interesting, any opinions?
 
Frankly, in combat, in a desert environment, i'd take a good AK over an AR. It's just good insurence to have a gun you can dump a handfull of sand into and have it fire.

Wondering why the brits haven't figured out to drop their POS L85's and grab some enemy AK's
 
Why not? It's a good little carbine.

I've been assuming that our boys are mostly seeing the 30 caliber AKMs over there and not the 5.56mm AK-74s right? (Can't go by what the press indicates, they are all AK-47s to them)
 
God Bless our boys & girls for picking up and using the AK. I'm one happy and cheap taxpayer.
 
Where ever the AK goes, people fall in love with it. When ever and where ever the SHTF, the AK is there. Reliable, durable, and accurate enough. The 7.62x39 round was partially the child of the bloody, brutal house-to-house combat of Stalingrad. In this, it excels. For urban combat and close quarters, the AK is perfect. The funny thing is, some folks don't like the short buttstock of the AK-47. Now here's Bushmaster selling an AR with a shorty stock. For less than 300 yards, the AK is great. The sights are fine. You just have to practice with them. The safety you have to get used to. There is no tiny cotter pin to get lost during cleaning as with a certain other rifle I know of. But the AK is a lesson in keeping things simple. Will U.S. Army Ordnance Corps learn the lesson? No, of course not. So it will be up to our enemies to equip our troops from time to time.
 
I'm NOT Gary! Cheap, but not when it comes to the 'edge' in weaponary! In VN when faced with the AK we had an edge with both the M-14 and M-16. In every battle since we have refined that edge until we come to the M-4. An M-4 es[ecially with a dot optic like Aimpoint mounted is DEFINITIVELY SUPERIOR in CQB! without me going into a huge defense of the M-4 (at least) let me say this: I challenge anyone who doubts to best or closely equal a REPUTABLE,(THUNDER RANCH, GUNSITE, John Farnham ect.) course of CQB fire with a AK series compared to an M-4 !!! There are a wizard or two who can make a good show but even those will 'die' compared to an 'A' ticket operator of an M-4. That said I own 4 or 5 of the Best AK variants(pre ban ) to arm neighbors and ill equipted friends for the end of the world ( or gun confiscation, whatever comes first!). But I think I will(and my sons will) stick to the AR format for CQB and FN-FAL or HK battle rifles for longer fights.. Happiness is to kill your fanatic enemy first! Spraying is playing!:rolleyes:
 
You mean the SA80?

Happens to be the same exact gun.

However, the british army uses the designation L85A2 for their current rifles. The SA80 happens to be the designation given to the prototype. Just like the M16 is the military designation for the AR15 (That's a bit confusing because the prototype was called the AR15, a name which was then adopted for the civillian version of the rifle.)

The british army uses the L85, which is their military designation for the SA80.
 
Gordon, Thunder Ranch and Gunsite are far and away from actual combat. There are several reasons for this:

1.) They're not laying satchel charges under you while you shoot.
2.) They're not shooting RPGs first to take out a Hummer and signal all the faithful to open up with their AKs.
3.) The targets aren't shooting back.
4.) The ARs used are not off-the-rack out of a U.S. Army arms room.
5.) There aren't civilians who smile by day and shoot by night.
6.) There aren't rules of engagement that require the steel plates to fire first before you can engage them.
7.) There aren't morale-sapping liberal reporters right next to you while you're shooting at Thunder Ranch going on and on about the "steel plate quagmire".
8.) You're not fighting a guerilla war at Thunder Ranch or Gunsite.
9.) You have plenty of time to clean your weapon and snazz it up as a civilian.
10.) And last, but not least-----Thunder Ranch and Gunsite are NOT wars!!!!!!!!!!!
 
I can't say I disagree with the logic, given the realities.

However, it eliminates the possibility of recognizing your enemies by the sound of the weapon if both sides are using the same. I would hate to see a friendly fire incident or worse due to this.
 
The difference between our minimal losses and their getting their clock cleaned , 'mano a mano' is that our soldiers are warrior atheletes just like champion shooters (only different in format) that is : 11bravo's and spec ops. I CAN see support personnel well served by a Krinkov or something like that. But NCO Combat troops these days get trained over and over and over and are even given credit cards to buy optical sights ect , within reason , if there is a short fall.Gun's of these dudes ARE sighted in! I doubt many E-3s even make it to combat anymore, because of extensive live ops. Dunno about marine's they be different I think they could kill with sticks if ordered to! But by the holy Khaki I'll bet the Marines WOULD NEVER spray and pray in combat! Ever see the pathetic 'advanced training of Iraqui's' armed with AK's? While they are spraying from the hip in building clearing acting the fanatic turd world clutzes they are? ? Our boys walk 'Groucho Marx style with M-4's point eye level and move like atheletes between cover. That ghost ring rear sight don't shift in indoor /outdoor lighting like the AK's , but then in the turd world(and former Com block) who uses sights other than snipers and Moisin operators.?Of course no rifle is gonna protect a so;dier from a RPG, Mine, explosive, or getting shoot in back of head when you let your guard down And YES SOME poor guys name is always gonna be on some bullet once in a while!
 
The more Iraqi ammo our troops burn up shooting and shooting at Iraqis the better.

Wareout the other guys equipment and use up all his ammo shooting him.

What's not to like.????

S-

Didn't the Brits take this a step further in WWII by making lots of STENS to use/use up captured German ammo ? Seems like I read that comment in a book once.
 
I'm certain at least half of the troops in my company would use an AK, if they could...and we have the M4 with M68 CCO (Aimpoint), and most of us also have backup flip-up irons mounted.

A good deal of our training in the past year and half has been CQB drills, with focus on quick presentation, front sight, squeeze, reaquire, squeeze (well, now it's dot on target).

John
 
"Sgt. Eric Harmon, a tanker who has a full 75-round drum, five 30-round magazines, plus 200-300 rounds in boxes for his AK."

The guys at AK-47.net must be loving this.
 
Found it really interesting that a US commander more or less said, well my guys need rifles, and we have piles of them around here.

Some REMF is supply says we don't need 'em, we'll get em somehow. Nothing to do with "whats better" it's what they need.
 
I think we at THR "NEED" at lease one each too!

Sell them at home and finance the war effort ... CMP's next
weapon .... :D
 
Dr. Rob noticed the same thing that I did. There was no discussion on which was "better." Sadly, there aren't enough rifles for all of our troops there, so they're grabbing what they can. They would do the same if they were recovering homemade rifles from Vietnamese peasants. In this case, they're getting a decent fighting tool.
 
"not nough rifles for our troops there" but the gubbamint gave 30,000 M-16s to the Palestinian"police" ! The Gubbamint seems to find plenty guns for everybody everywhere in the world. This is the same gubbamint that wants to cut "combat pay" and 'separation allowances' to troops in Afganistan and Iraq. And can't find drug benefits for our seniors but wants to drop BILLIONS iinto poop hole afrika for AIDS fooling around!:fire:
 
This is a news story. It proves nothing. It is not a scientific study of the reliability, controllability, or lethality of the AK vs. the AR either in CQB or gernal patrol duties. Is there any question but that every single one of us would love to have a battle rifle over there if all we were issued was a 9mm handgun?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top