UK gun control laws fail. Solution: More Laws!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kindrox

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
703
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6937457.stm

Emphasis mine.

Britain has some of the toughest gun laws in the world, and has done a great deal to choke off the supply - but as long as there is a demand for guns there will always be someone willing to find a way to provide them, at a price.

Since a ban on handguns was introduced after Thomas Hamilton murdered 16 children and their teacher at Dunblane in 1996, criminals have found it harder and harder to find guns. Not according to crime statistics?

'Guns are rare'

"The suggestion that Britain is awash with guns is simply not true," one senior police officer told the BBC News website.

The vast majority of handguns that were legally held before Dunblane are believed to have been handed in during various amnesties in the past decade.

But, as Detective Chief Inspector John Lyons, of Greater Manchester Police's Armed Crime Unit, says, "where there's a will there's a way".

These guns from (Operation) Carbon are still out there. We're recovering them regularly

One increasingly popular route is to buy blank-firing guns on the continent and import them before converting them into deadly weapons.

In November last year three men were given long jail sentences after being convicted of smuggling 274 replica guns from Germany, which were converted in a Manchester workshop.

Four men were jailed for up to 18 years after another Greater Manchester Police operation that unearthed a similar racket, importing guns - that had already been converted - from Lithuania.

Poor quality guns

Gavin Hales, a criminologist who has carried out research into gun crime for the Home Office and the Metropolitan Police, said many of the converted guns on Britain's streets were fairly poor quality and not particularly powerful, but they could still be lethal, especially at close range.

EU DIRECTIVE 477
Will reinforce the obligation to mark firearms at the time of manufacture
Will extend the minimum period for keeping information on firearms from five to 10 years
Will incorporate more extensive principles on the deactivation of firearms.
Will make sure appropriate penalties are applied to prohibit the illicit manufacturing of or trafficking in firearms.

MEPs are currently discussing amendments to a European directive which police hope could make a big difference in the fight against gun crime.

The new, updated rules, which replies Directive 477 will introduce a number of extra controls on the sale of guns.

Gisela Kallenbach, the German Green MEP responsible for pushing through the directive, said: "You can never 100% stop people illegally obtaining guns no matter what legislation you have, but with the legislation you can at least make it as difficult as possible." Since you cannot stop the illegal obtaining of guns, focus your efforts on the law abiding :banghead:

The directive will mean individuals wanting to buy blank-firing and imitation guns will have to prove their identity to the retailer or manufacturer, who will be under a duty to register that sale in the same way as the sale of a new or used car.

Buyers would have to provide a passport or identification card.

"If you can manage it with cars then why not with guns?" said Ms Kallenbach.

'Loophole'

"It's a loophole we need to close if we are to reduce the number of guns on the streets," says Manchester's Labour MEP Arlene McCarthy, who has been campaigning for changes in the directive.

She added: "What is clear is that these weapons are circulating in Manchester and Liverpool and are being used in drive-by shootings and other incidents."

She said: "We hope to fast track this new directive to get it in place by the end of the year."

Mr Hales said converted guns seemed to be the biggest threat on the streets, although there are other sources.

"Each year hundreds of shotguns are taken in burglaries and there is of course leakage of legally-held guns, for example after the first Gulf War a number of battlefield souvenirs arrived back in this country due to lax controls," he said.


The danger of "leakage" of military weapons was highlighted in 2001. Three London drug dealers were jailed after police raided homes in Barnet and recovered a cache of 9mm pistols which had been stolen from an army barracks in Wiltshire.

Last month two soldiers from the Royal Yorkshire Regiment were convicted of smuggling guns from Iraq and trying to sell them at a British Army base.

Last year 28-year-old Amjad Hussain was jailed after a joint operation between HM Revenue & Customs and the American ATF agency. A lot of these idiot email/forum solicitations for illegal acts probably are the ATF.

Several guns which Hussain had bought from US-based websites were found at his flat in Reading, Berkshire.

But imported weapons, mostly emanating from eastern Europe, remain the biggest threat. Bring up the USA first and then admit the real source are actually europeans. Brilliant.

In 2003 gangster David King was killed at a gym in Hoddesdon in suburban Hertfordshire with a burst of gunfire from an AK-47 assault rifle. The weapon, which had originally belonged to the Hungarian prison service, had come to the UK via a notorious Belgian arms dealer.

At present there are no official statistics on the origin of firearms used in crimes on the streets of Britain.

Ballistics database

But that should all change soon.

The National Ballistics Intelligence Service (Nabis) is due to go live in April next year. It will provide the first national ballistics database for the police.

The ballistics database should help police link guns to crimes It has worked SO well for Canada.

Nabis' programme manager, Det Ch Supt Paul James, said it would provide quick-time ballistics analysis for detectives investigating murders and other shootings.

Ballistics tests would be done in less than 48 hours, which would enable officers investigating shootings to make links with other crimes at an earlier stage and give them a better chance of solving cases. Which is an admission that shootings are a big problem in the UK. It must suck to on one hand have to deny there is a gun problem, but on the other hand actually have a big "gun" problem

But the project is also designed to improve intelligence on gun crime to allow the police to be more pro-active in tackling the supply of guns.

Det Ch Supt James told the BBC News website: "This is going to be a massive step forward.

'Changing the culture'

"We can change the culture. The harder guns are to get hold of, the better." What is the old adage about the definition of insanity.

SEIZURES IN 2005/6
Handguns and rifles - 314
Shotguns - 50
Gun components - 71
Ammunition - 4,479
Source: HM Revenue & Customs

Revenue & Customs are at the forefront of efforts to stop guns getting into the country.

A spokesman said there was no doubt guns were smuggled in on ferries, but they had achieved several notable intelligence-led successes.

In July two men were jailed for a total of 24 years for trying to smuggle in two Czech assault rifles, which had been broken down into components.

The guns, along with 460 rounds of ammunition, were found during the search of a car at Dover docks.

The Customs spokesman said: "We can't stop every single passenger and we work on where the risks are. The figures suggest the number of guns being smuggled is at a fairly low level compared with drugs." Pound for pound I am guessing there is more money in drugs. The guns are probably more for organized crime to control the drug profits more than they are designed to sells to crackheads.

The UKs war on guns sounds just like our war on drugs. We are always right on the verge of "winning" with our "new" plans and increased budget. Yet as the decades roll by nothing really changes. And what does usually has little to do with federal government policies.
 
The victory comes from keeping the population meek and fearful while more and more of their civil liberties are stripped away. There's a CCTV camera in every inch of central London now, and they're spreading. Orwell was on the money as it turns out.
 
The victory comes from keeping the population meek and fearful while more and more of their civil liberties are stripped away.

You captured it there. A lot of people I come in contact with seem to have major fears of what *could happen*. In one discussion my own FIL was going on and on about how people should not have machine guns/assault rifles/50 cals/CCW because of what people *might* do. I asked him when the last time he heard of a crime being committed by a legally owned machine gun or a 50 cal or a CCW. Well of course he hasn’t.

But someone *might* do something and he cannot fathom some someone is actually doing something - the government. He is part of the FOX news smart, absolutely brainless generation.
 
Thank you KINDROX for the thread,well set out and commented on.I still have a problem with gun crime figures in the UK,from what we are hearing,reading and watching there seems to be an explosion in gun related crimes.There are shootings,guns seized but it is not as widespread and as common as we are led to believe.
If the government and police had their way there would be a total ban on all weapons including toys within the UK.I for one do not know the answer to any of this,but we as gun owners are among the most law abiding people of the UK.
 
I remember getting a letter/catalogue from Wolf Armouries a month or so back, reminding me that this was my last chance to buy....


...Airsoft BB guns that look realistic. No joke. Can't even get them anymore, I think.
 
gun laws failed not sure that they have number of spree killings in the uk by nutters since dunblane zero nadda not one school shootings not an issue.

gun crime not linked to drug dealing gangs fairly rare

most police are not routinely armed or wish to be

UK has a very low level of gun ownership most common weapon a two barrel shotgun. there are no dangerous wild animals apart from the fearsome haggis:D
a small professional army and very little civillian interest in shooting virtually none in right to carry
 
You take the the High road and i'll take the the Low road and i'll be in Scotland before ye.....They don't like us...
 
I wouldn't go that far, MacFarlaine. Remember, we're their equivilent of The Hun. It's not surprising some people seem to want us to fail.
 
Meek and fearful my arse.

I don't walk your streets but I do regularly read british news. I have to say your news media heavily suggests that crime is seriously up, seriously bad, the UK goverment seems unwilling/unable to do anything about it. Your news and internet forums also heavily suggest the UK population is aware of the situation, fearful of being victimized, and yet is unwilling/unable to implement political reforms to actually change anything.

I am sorry if it comes across as brit bashing. I posted the story as an update on the UK's social experiment of removing guns. There is no reason to believe that if we did the social experiment of banning guns, we would get a result out of proportion to the UKs.
 
I see what you mean, Kindrox. British papers have 4 main themes:
1) crime is up! OMG!
2) house prices are up! We're rich!
3) house prices are down! We're doomed!
4) royals. they're great! No, they suck! No, they're great! etc

Add in some celebrity scandal and dark muttering about Johny Foreign and you've got most of the British media.

I'd reply and actually make sense if my net cafe time wasn't up. :)
 
There won't be anymore bashing of a population. Saying that all Brits are meek and timid is the same as saying all Americans are bloodthirsty barbarians who relish any opportunity to kill someone, anyone.

I know for a fact they all aren't timid. The men of the 8th Bn, The Light Infantry were some of the best soldiers I've ever served with. They have their political problems to deal with, the same as we do, and it makes no more sense to lump them all into the same category then it does to lump all California residents into the same category.

If you want to stick your chest out and pat yourself on the back because by an accident of birth you live in a more free society then someone else, THR isn't the place to do it.

Jeff
 
Jeff,

I don't know about Cosmo but my comments were not about UK citizens but USA citizens. My boots have never been on UK ground. As far as I can see the major differance between the USA and UK gun situation are the initial conditions. I.e. USA had a more developed gun culture and a peice of paper supposedly restricting the government's ability to restrict our rights.

Any underlying social ill they have, we probably have in spades.

That said, IMHO both the USA and the UK have MANY (but obviously not all) fearful and meek "subjects". The truth is the truth. Somebody else labeled it "bashing".
 
There's a CCTV camera in every inch of central London now,
Have you looked around you lately? They just about cover the US as well, and those that aren't permanently installed are carried around by just about everyone else.

Orwell was more prescient than many realize. The world of 1984 was one continuously at war - wars which served to stabilize and neuter society - in which the government called for everyone to "sacrifice", in one way or another. Sound familiar? It should - DDI Donald Kerr just called for Americans to expect to sacrifice privacy for their own good.

I've already ventured off topic, but read more Orwell if you don't think it's 1984 already.
 
Woodybrighton I agree with your conclusion (in a cynical way) but for different reasons. The Firearms Act 1968 Amendment 1997 satisfied the public outcry for 'something to be done.' It also served its other purpose of gaining political ground. Of course, Hamilton should have had his FAC revoked years before '96 and that was the duty of the police. But when was the truth important in politics?

As for spree killings, since when did they have to have guns at their centre? The 7/7 bombings a few years ago used explosives. Guess what? They were illegally manufactured, carried and deployed. Guess what? Murder is illegal. Murder of multiple people is also illegal. If someone went on a killing spree, I doubt the law would be their primary concern, whether that's the common-law rulings dating back centuries which outlaw possibly the worst possible crime, or a modern statute which criminalises those who would own an object, no matter what their intentions. Dunblane was a blip -- a tragic, needless and senseless blip certainly, but a blip nonetheless. I doubt though that, say, a certian colour of electrical wire being banned in light of the 7/7 bombers using it for their IEDs would stop future bombers using it -- or indeed that it would stop future bombers using another, non banned colour of wire. Who knows what weaopn might be used in the next 'spree killing'; perhaps a car driven on the pavements of London during rush hour? Perhaps a bit of e-coli in the water supply?
 
SEIZURES IN 2005/6
Handguns and rifles - 314
Shotguns - 50
Gun components - 71
Ammunition - 4,479
Come On!!! You have GOT to be kidding me. That's all?? that's it? 364 firearms total, 71 components (ohmygod) and less than 5K of ammo... and thats a ???Problem???

Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill. I guess when your national murder statistics are 2 or 3 a month, when the numbers roar up into the stratosphere around 4 to 6 a month... things look pretty bleak but I think that the above numbers are somewhat... i dunno (no offense to anyone in the UK here) limp.
... (in 1990)15 to 20 kids a year were caught with guns in the Clark County School District - that the legislation passed. Last year (2005), just under 50 kids had weapons seized in Clark County Schools.
That's in Las Vegas (and surrounding towns) Middle and High Schools alone. You're not trying people. :rolleyes:

Just trying to put things into a perspective I can relate to.

U.K. Crime may be up. I'm sure it must be, I read about it every now and then and no one is saying it's going down. But even Robin Hood was an outlaw... to those in power. I bet the press lambasted him as well, lurking about a forest, waylaying the high and mighty and such.

The only thing that will truly stop an individual criminal is permanent incarceration or termination when apprehended. More laws prohibiting this or that just create another black market allowing untaxed money to flow with ensuing power struggles between those players who choose that line of work whilst the law abiding continue to go about their day to day.
 
More laws prohibiting this or that just create another black market allowing untaxed money to flow with ensuing power struggles between those players who choose that line of work whilst the law abiding continue to go about their day to day.

Shhhhh! That's supposed to be a secret!
 
Keeping the population meek and fearful
Is more of a statement about the goals (or appearance of goals) of UK government and media, we face the same issues in almost all major US cities. I didn't take the meek and fearful statement to be a generalization or a slam on a culture but a commentary on a government and its manipulation of a society.

We hear the same thing here, every time someone (non LEO) is on the news for stepping in to help some one in a self defense situation.

The first words out of the LEO spokesperson are always "we don't recommend individuals get involved" "we prefer you call the police and wait for help"

This statement represents indoctrination of a culture of the meek and fearful, it is an affront to the concept of self reliance.

I don't mean these comments to be in any way a negative statement on LEO first responders, I really appreciate the work they do but the nanny state follow up makes me want to :barf:
 
I do believe London has one of the lowest murder rates in the world compared to other large cities.

K
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top