Links to independent verifiable sources that document the current problems the Army is experiencing with Beretta M-9 and the cause of the problems will be enough of a start.
You're setting up a potentially impossible requirement to fulfill. There is a real possibility that an internal report (or reports) exist. They may have been produced by any service branch, or may be a DoD report. There's no way to know if the report exists unless you are allowed access to documents of that type.
A report of the type would, in all probability, be a controlled document and not easily available to anyone outside of a service branch or the DoD with the need to have the data. The information certainly won't be available to civilians - unless they have a need to have that information.
Setting up a personal requirement of an independent report as the only information you'll believe, doesn't make first hand, empirical data null and void.
The way reports get written generally starts with collecting and quantifying empirical, field-generated data. If an armorer, who works on hundreds or thousands of pistols a year, tells you that he regularly replaces a certain part that has broken - you don't need a report to verify the information is valid.
One could take the reverse approach and demand that you provide a report stating that the Beretta has had all of its problems fixed and currently works for a specific number of rounds with no malfunctions.
Can you do that? Why not? I'm not willing to believe anything you've posted so far unless you can produce independent information.
I hope you can see that me setting up a requirement that you can't meet really isn't very helpful in, what is supposed to be, an open information exchange.