coosbaycreep
Member
I've been arguing with other KT haters on another forum lately about whether keltec makes guns that are reliable enough to trust with your life. Personally, I think they are. I haven't put many rounds through either of the three I've owned, but it's the only brand I've carried since I've had my CHL, and it's the main gun I was open carrying (while hiking/biking) before I got my CHL. I had a few malfunctions with my first P32, but nothing that would keep me from carrying it again.
I'm not saying they're the greatest, most well made, and most reliable guns ever made, but I honestly don't think there's any manufacturer who makes guns that are a better choice for CC when you consider their cost, weight, size, and reliability.
I'm know glocks, XDs, revolvers, etc. are better made, (generally) more reliable, etc, but none of those are comparable in price, size, and weight to a keltec. That's why I got rid of a PF9 and a S&W 442, because they're too big, and too heavy.
So, I want opinions from people who either OWN, have OWNED, or who have at least SHOT a keltec. Please don't vote if you've never even held one and just think they're garbage because they're plastic and don't cost a small fortune.
I'm not saying they're the greatest, most well made, and most reliable guns ever made, but I honestly don't think there's any manufacturer who makes guns that are a better choice for CC when you consider their cost, weight, size, and reliability.
I'm know glocks, XDs, revolvers, etc. are better made, (generally) more reliable, etc, but none of those are comparable in price, size, and weight to a keltec. That's why I got rid of a PF9 and a S&W 442, because they're too big, and too heavy.
So, I want opinions from people who either OWN, have OWNED, or who have at least SHOT a keltec. Please don't vote if you've never even held one and just think they're garbage because they're plastic and don't cost a small fortune.