macadore
Member
You're not. Because I didn't write that.
You're right, it's what fiddletown wrote, but you defended it. See #40. You changed the subject when you wrote,
Do you honestly think they're no distinction between j-walking and armed robbery? That is a reductio ad absurdam.
You aren't going to win this argument because a) this is the way the law is and it isn't changing anytime soon, and b) suggesting that felons ought to be able to have guns is a really really bad idea.
I have already won this argument because you're having to change the subject and claim that I wrote something I never wrote to avoid defending an indefensible statement.
Do you believe,
[2] Committing a crime shows a flaw in one's character. One has demonstrated, by committing a crime, a reason to question his integrity, honesty, judgment, impulse control, sense of responsibility and/or trustworthiness. The world is full of people who are subject to the temptations and stresses of living in this world and still don't commit crimes. Serving one's time doesn't magically repair one's character or demonstrate that he has become more responsible or trustworthy than he was before he committed the crime.
Last edited: