I see this debate all the time. So that debate isn't the question here, I think overall most feel the .45 is a better defensive round but who knows the real answer. I guess the ones who've had to put both to the test would be the ones with the answer there. It does seem like the idea with 45 is impact the target in a big way and don't hurt anything else in the area (i.e. don't pass through).
But why didn't we hear about this as much when most police forces were carrying 38 special revolvers? 38's were used for decades. It's the same basic diameter as a 9mm. Is it a heavier or slower bullet thing? If balistics is done right, shouldn't ALL of the 9mm's energy be transfered to the target? In that case, wouldn't the 9mm be a much better round for protection than the old 38 cartridge?
Another thing I've wondered, couldn't someone create a mouse fart load for 9mm with a heavy bullet and low powder charge that would accomplish a similar idea to 45?
But why didn't we hear about this as much when most police forces were carrying 38 special revolvers? 38's were used for decades. It's the same basic diameter as a 9mm. Is it a heavier or slower bullet thing? If balistics is done right, shouldn't ALL of the 9mm's energy be transfered to the target? In that case, wouldn't the 9mm be a much better round for protection than the old 38 cartridge?
Another thing I've wondered, couldn't someone create a mouse fart load for 9mm with a heavy bullet and low powder charge that would accomplish a similar idea to 45?
Last edited: