Charges would be likely. Where and when did this happen?e and came back to BG#1 to “finish him off”.
Yes, the first photo in #14 is after he put ~8 into the bad guy on the right and shooting at BG #2. The 2nd is after he disengaged BG #2 out of the picture and came back to BG#1 to “finish him off”.
Tells me to sign in and create an account. I do not do that.Have to click the watch on YouTube part.
Looked like the fight was still going on when he shot the guy on the right a second time.
Sometimes BG doesn't move for several seconds or even more than several, then suddenly gets up again.I can certainly agree with that.
How about on the ground, face down and not moving, at all, after already being shot ~8 times?
I think the guy had about 8 in him before he dropped his gun in the street and collapsed on the sidewalk. The good guy was closer to the firearm than the bad guy, when he got his second helping of ammunition.
Italicized words in brackets above added by me for clarity. Whether the armed attacker has been shot eight times or eighteen times…if he is still fighting he is STILL fighting. If the order in which multiple attackers are addressed requires a fleeting moment of "triage" and reassessment, so be it."…I think <bad> guy had about 8 <bullets> in him before he dropped his gun in the street and collapsed on the sidewalk. The good guy was closer to the firearm than the bad guy…"
How fast can you process information under stress?
Current doctrine is to fire until the threat has ended.
Ok, how do we know when that is? I am not seeing an aggressive move from the guy after he falls to the ground like a sack of potato’s. The good guy even closes distance
What we have here is video
My anticipation is little grace is extended to criminal assailants who complain about "unfair" R.O.E.
Years ago I posted a thread here on how you can't get the whole story from video. It was dashcam video of a police shooting in a parking lot. It certainly looked like the officer murdered the suspect. But the dash cam video from another squad car on the scene showed that the suspect was armed and the shooting was justified. Sometimes angles make the difference as in that case, sometimes we need audio that we don't have and we often don't get a semi complete picture of what actually happened until the case goes to court.True and it’s not uncommon at all for people to see different things or have different feelings. Like the Vegas smoke shop jumper was or was not a threat, as another example.
I am not seeing an aggressive move from the guy after he falls to the sidewalk like a sack of potato’s.
"Would you expect someone stopping next to you in a car to jump out and try to kill you without warning?"
"Would you expect someone stopping next to you in a car to jump out and try to kill you without warning?"
I do not know what you mean by that, but i would not want to be quoted in a court of law as having said it.If I don't know you and you're going out of your way to engage me you are a threat
I do not know what you mean by that,
but i would not want to be quoted in a court of law as having said it.