<knocks on wooden door ... peers inside ...>
Hello? Is anybody here?
Worked all weekend. Heard fireworks.
Got some sleep though.
Dang, I hate working all the time.
It's going to pay off though ...
At least, that's what I tell myself.
___________
Brought out both the 1894C & the 336A tonight.
Unloaded the '94C (has been the house gun).
It had some .357 mag flat top fmj in it.
2 of 3 stopped cycling.
Didn't jam; working it got them through,
but it stopped cycling.
Not a good characteristic for a house gun.
Seems it doesn't like the flat tops, now.
I does ok with hp.
So, after unloading, I began to shoulder & cycle both.
First time I'd compared them side by side in terms of
which felt better, balanced better, mounted better, pointed better.
I've appreciated the '94C's size (fits in a large backpack), ammo range,
lightweight, and shooting quality.
What can I say about my 336 that hasn't been said. He da' gun.
I've often thought, if I had to choose one -
- which one would it be?
<heresy> More often than not, I've thought it'd be the '94C (in part to match my x42 in .38 spl & 65).
But tonight, after a side by side comparison over a few hours, I'm thinking it'd be the 336.
A bit longer, a bit heavier, but dang ... if you're gonna carry a rifle ...
It just feels better, balances better, shoulders better ... not to mention shoots bigger bullets faster farther.
Not so good, though, for small game, at least with store bought rnds.
So, can we review again: what are those commercially available rnds for a .30-30 (push a shotgun pellet into a case loaded with a small powder charge); how effective are they for small game; and for your reloaders, what are the smallest you could load for, say, rabbit or squirrel.
The other option for me if I had to face that "which rifle if only one" question would be the 39A. Companioned with the 65 in .357 mag/.38 spl, I'd feel OK.
Yeah, ok, I'm dreaming. It's been a long weekend. Maybe I'll get some sleep ...