.380 question.

Status
Not open for further replies.
:rolleyes: If you're stuck with the 380 auto/9mm kurz: Use FMJ/RN bullets, never fire only once, and head shoot him if you can. If he's still standing and continues to rush at you, remember to step off his vertical body centerline at the last moment, and fire that little 380 directly into his face. :eek:

If petite appeals to you, well then, here's small 'n nice -

anicerugersp101tm4.jpg











Naked Prophet, good post! (Except for that unexplained, 'faster' comment.)
 
Ghostwalker said:
If you're stuck with the 380 auto/9mm kurz: Use FMJ/RN bullets, never fire only once, and head shoot him if you can. If he's still standing and continues to rush at you, remember to step off his vertical body centerline at the last moment, and fire that little 380 directly into his face.

If petite appeals to you, well then, here's small 'n nice -

and just what model and caliber is that?
 
People keep bringing up the 12GA and other larger guns when the question is about SELF DEFENSE. The only shotgun ammo that can be considered SELF DEFENSE is the .410 and that only because of The Judge by Taurus. I don't know of any concealable handgun that is capable of handling 12GA ammo, in fact don't know of any handgun that handles 12GA.

I have yet to find anybody who knocks the .380 or, for that matter the .25 and .22 for self defense, who will volunteer to stand in front of someone firing one of these mouse guns. Is the .380 the perfect SD gun? No, however I don't feel unarmed when I'm carrying my PPK.

Is there such a thing as a hand-holdable firearm that is guaranteed a one-shot stopper? No. Even the so-called 'elephant guns' are not one-stoppers unless bullet is placed in exactly the right spot; which is why double rifles were invented.

In SD situations you shoot until the threat is neutralized and no longer a threat. Does this mean until the threat is dead? Probably but not necessarily, but certainly no longer a threat.

Back to the OP. I think the .380 is perfectly acceptable as an SD round, if I didn't I wouldn't carry one. Don't listen to those people who knock any HP ammo because it might get filled with clothing. That argument has been used every since Lee Jurras developed the first good HP ammo for handguns. The facts show just the opposite to be true. In a handgun, any caliber, JHP ammo is a much better choice than hardball for defensive use. If you ever do have to use your gun in self defense and have reason to believe you have penetration problems then quickly change your target from the center of mass to the nose area.
 
I wonder if there is anyone listening who has actually fired a .380 in self-defense, and scored a hit.

I wonder if this person or persons would be willing to simply say "Works fine" or "Didn't work well"?

I wonder, I wonder. Hmmm. :scrutiny:


-T.
 
Himm, is the 9x18 makarov (slightly higher power) better to do FMJ or JHP for defense?

Often wondered this myself, I concluded that it depends on the round. I've seen very hot surplus that i know would overpenetrate (ball), and I have little faith in the standard cheapie Russian stuff with animal pictures on the boxes (hp). Wolf Military Classic FMJ seems the appropriate trade off.
 
tawcat said:
and just what model and caliber is that?

It's a Ruger SP-101 fitted with a 2 1/4" barrel and Hogue Monogrip. In debilitating 357 magnum, of course! ;)

The one I carry as backup looks like this -

josnewrugerrc1.jpg


Archer1945 said:
Back to the OP. I think the .380 is perfectly acceptable as an SD round, if I didn't I wouldn't carry one. Don't listen to those people who knock any HP ammo because it might get filled with clothing. That argument has been used every since Lee Jurras developed the first good HP ammo for handguns. The facts show just the opposite to be true. In a handgun, any caliber, JHP ammo is a much better choice than hardball for defensive use. If you ever do have to use your gun in self defense and have reason to believe you have penetration problems then quickly change your target from the center of mass to the nose area.

:eek: Wow, you should be more careful; you're going to get someone killed with that sort of advice! (Maybe yourself?) The, 'facts' don't show anything of the sort. About two years ago we had a terrific shootout, here, in NEPA. The perp took an incredible number of hits from 40 caliber Winchester Ranger SXT's without going down.

Like a zombie he just kept on firing, reloading, and firing. At the autopsy, the coroner remarked on the denim and down in and around the bullet wounds. IN FACT most of the police officers' 180 grain JHP's had failed to open in accord with the design criteria. Needless to say the Hazleton PD has been looking at Glock 21's and the 45 acp for the past two years!

I, also, own one of the nicest Walther PPK-S pistols ever to come out of Germany. In 35 years it has never - not once - jammed on me! Still, with the possible exception of weddings and funerals, I'm not stupid enough to attempt to carry it as a primary; and, whenever I am so armed, I always carry an additional two magazines.

Here's the link to that Hazleton, PA, shootout, enjoy!

Shootout!

And then (not to, 'rock your world', but .... ) there's always THIS
 
Last edited:
Ghost Walker said:
Still, with the possible exception of weddings and funerals, I'm not stupid enough to attempt to carry it as a primary...

So, you are stupid enough at weddings and funerals?

Juuuust kiddingggg. :D

IN FACT, a cop carrying a .380 primary ranks among the dumbest ideas of all time.

The average citizen carrying a .380 primary is perfectly acceptable.

Average Joe's who compare their everyday SD needs to those of on-the-job LE have a wire crossed someplace I think. :rolleyes:


-T.
 
GhostWalker:

Doesn't your story prove that the caliber was not what is effective but shot placement. If an incredible number of hits from a .40sw with law enforcement grade ammunition does'nt do the job then we are all in trouble unless there was another reason. I think the reason may have been no CNS shot or not enough large blood moving organs were hit to give an effective stop and this can happen no matter what the weapon especially when talking handguns.

For me it's 12 gauge if I can (at home with no shtf)

9mm when I have to and .380 if it's all i'll carry.
 
Himm, is the 9x18 makarov (slightly higher power) better to do FMJ or JHP for defense?

Often wondered this myself, I concluded that it depends on the round. I've seen very hot surplus that i know would overpenetrate (ball), and I have little faith in the standard cheapie Russian stuff with animal pictures on the boxes (hp). Wolf Military Classic FMJ seems the appropriate trade off.

9x18 makarov is on the very cusp of being powerful enough to achieve both expansion and penetration.

The Hornady XTP, while an exceptional bullet in many calibers, expands too aggressively in the 9x18, and only penetrates about 7 inches! Brass Fetcher results However, the Silver Bear seemed to do just fine. That was bare gelatin - heavy clothing may slow expansion, and allow the XTP to penetrate farther and prevent the Silver Bear from expanding at all.

I've been considering these results as I try to choose a carry load for my own PA-63, for when I can't conceal my Glock 19 (which is seldom) or as a backup.
 
:neener:Yep 380 works just fine. cared backup for 15 years.HP are fine also.but my 45 is better...:neener:
 
CorBon and Buffalo Bore make a good .380 defense round, I would defiantly check them out. I keep BB in my mouse gun, a .32 acp. It see to have quite a bit more punch to it then factory Remington, Federal or Winchester that I have shot.
 
Once upon a time, I went shopping late at night, just down the street to pick up a few things at Wally World. It was around 11pm when I pulled into my driveway, and before I got out of my vehicle, a car silently coasts up behind me, no engine, no lights, but I saw the ghostly figure in my side mirror due to a few of the neighbors porch lights (we don't have street lights yet). I was parked next to the community mailboxes that are just off my property, engine and lights cut and was listening to the end of some talk show host make his point when this vehicle rolled up. I dipped my hand in my shirt pocket and pulled out my P32 (because I was JUST running to the store down the road and WASN'T expecting trouble so I just went with what I had on me - a P32). These guys roll out of the car with a small crowbar and make for the mailboxes when they spy me in my darkened vehicle. They stop in their tracks, pile back in and take off about 6 feet and then stop. Now they come out again only this time the driver does too, gangster wannabee's or the real thing I don't know but the driver was over 20 and now I also notice that they have removed their rear license plate from their car, something from the early eighties to late seventies, a real gangbanger car. Inside the house I have a 12 guage and a SBH, but the house is locked and these three are no more than ten - twelve feet away. They were afraid to approach the car and I was afraid to startle them into making a move, so we locked eyes for what was quite a long time until they decided I had to have been armed, so after throwing the F.U at me they left. The next day I sold my P32 and bought a 2.5" 44 which turned out to be too big for pocket carry so now it's the 642 and even THAT is IMO under-powered. I never heard of anyone that wished for a smaller lighter gun when the SHTF and I guarantee that a .380 in such a scenerio will feel like a rubberband gun too. I am in the process of getting a car gun to back up my 642. I think someone said it long ago, mouse guns sure are good for carrying, I would hate to have bet my life on one. I think this is the second or third time I am relating this story BTW, FWIW, .380 and .32 and .38 are ALL pretty inadequate rounds except for worst case scenerios when all you are doing is wearing shorts and doing some quick errand, then again, isn't that exactly when stuff happens?
 
Thernlund said:
So, you are stupid enough at weddings and funerals?

Juuuust kiddingggg.

:eek: Hey, cut me some slack. I wasn’t the one getting married! ;)

‘Stupid’ I can certainly be; but, I am smart enough to have kept my PPK-S for more than 35 years, now. I don’t hate the 380; I just keep my expectations for this relatively weak little round where they belong.

ByAnyMeans said:
Doesn't your story prove that the caliber was not what is effective but shot placement. If an incredible number of hits from a .40sw with law enforcement grade ammunition doesn’t do the job then we are all in trouble unless there was another reason. I think the reason may have been no CNS shot or not enough large blood moving organs were hit to give an effective stop and this can happen no matter what the weapon especially when talking handguns.

:uhoh: Wow, that’s a tough question! I wish I had a definitive answer for you; but, I’m going to have to fall back on some, ‘real world’ thinking in order to reply. Yes, accurate and effective shot placement would certainly solve a very great many gunfighting dilemmas. The problem is that effective shot placement isn’t easy to achieve while you’re in the middle of a life and death gunfight.

In the real world you take whatever hits you’re able to make and are forced to deal with the immediate results. If all these FBI reports, and Drs. Fackler and Courtney’s research have given us anything, at all, it’s the certainty that there is no perfectly effective and reliable pistol bullet. The mass, the velocity, and the energy simply aren’t available! (Just between you and me I don’t think they ever will be, either.)

In order to solve the well known problems with handgun ammunition, the whole delivery system AND the ammunition would have to be changed. In my own experience as a combat handgunner I can tell you that once you’ve got a pistol bullet that will reliably do the job, you end up shooting it out of something that is totally impractical for combat handgunning; e.g.: Dirty Harry’s 44 Magnum revolver! The recoil and front sight dwell time, alone, will get you killed.

As far as JHP ammunition goes: If we’ve learned anything about it, at all, over the last 25 years it’s that it’s inconsistent. Sometimes, with some pistols, on some targets, and from certain angles it works; and at other times, with other pistols, on other targets, and from other angles it does not. Sure, the head and the CNS are always the preferred and most desirable targets; unfortunately, they are, also, the most difficult to hit.

The George Deeb gunfight left the Hazleton law enforcement community in an uproar! Four involved officers, shooting generally well regarded 40 caliber handguns, loaded with the nation’s premier law enforcement ammunition; and one tactical 5.56mm entry carbine weren’t able to quickly end this fight. Two officers were wounded and one had to sit there, wounded and unable to continue, while the perpetrator reloaded right in front of him.

Just so we understand each other: I regard any effort to hit the head and CNS as the equivalent of trying to hit a wiggling snake in the middle of a gunfight. Yes, it can be done; but, are you going to be able to do it in the time and with the opportunities allowed? This personal opinion on my part has significantly affected and radically changed the way I approach gunfighting.

Fact: I haven’t fired a single shot from a combat pistol in years! Everything I fire is in multiples of: two, three, or four. I have spent thousands of dollars teaching myself how to improve my repetitive shooting skills.

Fact: I will only carry a large caliber semiautomatic pistol as a primary.

Fact: I never carry less than 30 rounds of ammunition with me everywhere I go.

Fact: I shoot all of the popular pistol calibers reasonably well. However I shoot the 45 acp very well. This is, probably, because the 45 acp has the most controllable and the most rapidly recoverable recoil characteristics of all the other handgun calibers I’ve tried. What I can easily do with the slow heavy push of a 45 acp I need to concentrate harder on to accomplish with the sharp snappy recoil of a: 9mm, 40, or 357.

True, at the end of the day, shooting a 9mm seems like a cap gun; but, this is irrelevant to me because I want to fire a bullet that is a lot heavier, has a greater cross sectional density, and does a better job of penetrating AND delivering foot-pounds of energy into the target.

Sure, I’m not crazy about the 230 grain 45 acp’s 300 + foot pounds of muzzle energy; but, once things get speeded up, the recoil characteristics and front sight dwell time increase to levels which I consider to be unacceptable for swiftly, ‘weighing down’ a target.

Fact: I prefer to use FMJ/RN ball ammo; and, I definitely want that 11-12 inches of large caliber penetration, too. I, also, think that you or I have a better chance of winning the PowerBall lottery than we do of, either, getting hit by, or hitting someone else with a pass-through round! Besides, as the Hazleton gunfight clearly demonstrated: All pistol ammunition has the ability to easily pass through the intended target – ALL pistol ammunition!

I don’t expect everyone to agree with me. This is the internet; and, everyone is entitled to his own opinion. Hopefully, when, ‘sparks fly’ in a thread like this everybody will have an opportunity to share, to rectify, to modify, or just plain argue about his own personal opinions. This seems to be a large part of how we, all, learn.

I’m an old gunman; and, these are my own admittedly controversial opinions. I try to tell the truth as I see it; if I’m wrong, or, ‘stupid’ …… well, I promise you it is an honest mistake. In any event I have always tried very hard not to make the same mistake twice. Bigger heavier pistol bullets are my first choice; and, the pistol’s recoil characteristics are of supreme importance to me. If the gun AND cartridge don’t handle well, then, I certainly don’t want to be caught in the middle of a gunfight trying to use it.

Going for the head and CNS in the middle of a gunfight is like trying to catch the brass ring on a merry-go-round: Sometimes you’ll make it; but, most often you won’t. Consequently you’ve got to be able to do as much general damage as possible in the shortest amount of time. (This is something I think Dr. Michael Courtney emphasizes particularly well!) :)
 
Last edited:
A 380 in home defense, Buffalo Bore is my thinking.

But, while your reaching inches from your snooze button for your gun, reach for something a bit bigger is my opine. My LCP is my anytime gun, not my nightstand gun.

That said, it is not what I'm reaching for unless reaching is my pocket at home is my only warning. With two dogs, I suspect I have time since I've got one dog that barks at people crossing the street 100 feet away at the stop sign of the culdesac.
 
I think when it all hits the fan, anything you have on you will seem woefully inadequate.

I don't live life with the expectation of trouble at every turn, but I'm as prepared as is practical. And if it were permissable, I still doubt I'd go to the store with a shouldered AK.

Probably better to get as much training as possible with what you are carrying than to chase the ultimate guaranteed stop all threats handgun.
 
Although I hardly carry it anymore unless its a back-up I use Federal Hydroshocks in my 380....I would say that HS rounds make me more secure with a 380. then a round nose bullet...Thats just my opinion
 
I never heard of anyone that wished for a smaller lighter gun when the SHTF ...

I bet everyone who decided to leave their big heavy .45 at home was wishing they had a smaller lighter gun when the SHTF.
 
Never use police shootings as proof that a particular rounds isn't powerful enough. You often read about shootings where the officer fired 10 shots before the perp went down. What they don't tell you is that the cop missed with the first 9 shots.
 
^^^^ Or that cops are much more likely to encounter some crack head on a drug fueled rage screaming, "I'M NEVER GOING BACK YOU PIG!!!"


-T.
 
the naked prophet said:
I bet everyone who decided to leave their big heavy .45 at home was wishing they had a smaller lighter gun when the SHTF.
Yep - happened to me when I left my CZ 75 at home when going fishing about 20 years ago. Got mugged by 3 guys on a train and I would have preferred a .380 to the tanto I did have (I won more through luck than anything, but it wasn't a fun experience).
 
I have a ruger p89 9mm hi cap, a high point c9 9mm (has never failed) and a bersa thunder 380, All in my nightstand, Oh and a Mossberg 500 18.5 inch 12 guage. A atr 100 in .270 attire. Did I mention my nightstand was also my gunsafe ? A 380 would work just fine.
 
Home Defense

As the question was stated, it concerns HOME defense. For CCW you can debate the effectiveness of a .380. But in the home, why would you want a small caliber cartridge.

If you're using a small caliber, I prefer nine 30 cal. pellets (00 buck) leaving the muzzle at 1200 fps; followed-up quickly with nine more.

In less than a second, 18 pieces of lead to COM will stop most aggressors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top