I always hear that for home defense, you should have a shotgun. I used to agree and have had one under my bed for awhile now. But after a recent scare, I now have to wonder. The SG is so clumsy to handle indoors, to draw from a concealed location, to manuever quickly, etc. But with a handgun, everything is so quick and easy, and using one hand is a realistic option. I know the power level of a HG is soooooo much lower than a SG, but the possibility that it will be in your hand when it's needed, and be able to allow you to adapt to different situations as they arise means that when you need to shoot, you will be able to with a HG, whereas with a SG, the likelyhood of being overburdened with the necessities of the increased weight, length and 2 handed operation decrease the chance of being able to aim and fire effectively. Granted however, that if the SG is kept in the bedroom and it is only there to remain there and not be taken to other rooms in the event of a home invasion (call this the Washington DC tactic), then the SG shines. But it pretty much all other scenarios, doesn't it seem that the HG comes out on top?