You want to talk about defense of the homeland? That's different -- if we're invaded, we'll have no problem getting plenty of recruits (see 9/11)
The same whining complaint used by shirkers in every way -- the Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea, Viet Nam. "Well, I'd fight a different war, but not this war."
Y'know Vern, this post would be funny if it weren't so tragically prevalent in America today. I mean, first you indict anyone who disagrees with you or the war in Iraq as "shirkers" and then you proceed to list the very reasons that parents and young people should avoid blindly following the government.
Civil War? Lincoln practically suspended the Constitution to continue the war. He lied to the general public about the great Cause of emancipating slaves. If he was serious, why didn't he emancipate the slaves in the North? Political expediency. If he freed northern slaves, he would have lost the support of slave owning Union states. Emancipation had nothing to do with it, Lincoln knew the war was unpopular and was losing political support.
WWI: Wilson runs on a platform of promising not to get us involved in what was largely viewed as another in a string of endless European conflict, and by 1917, when the SOLDIERS of the belligerents were beginning to mutiny and refuse to fight, we show up and it's "game on" again. Our presence, inspired by the fact that big business was afraid of taking the huge losses they faced if Germany won, prolonged that war. And young men died.
WWII: Largely an extension of WWI, it was well-known that American businesses had lobbied for the military to avoid bombing certain targets within Hitler's Europe because they held huge financial interests in those areas. Had we gone ahead and bombed them, the war may have been shortened considerably. Yet, the politicians caved to pressure from big business and young men died.
Korea: This one hits home for me because my father served in this one. A UN debacle that resulted in what amounted to a "die for a tie" war. This would be the initial conflict whichg would highlight the hallmarks of the UN: corruption, incompetence, and lack of resolve.
Vietnam: A war predicated on the Gulf of Tonkin incident. An incident which never took place, yet was sold to the American public as the reason for jumping into SE Asia, and feeding young men and women into the military until eleven years and 57000 lives later, we decide to settle for "peace with honor".
THESE are the examples of the noble causes that you say we should use as reasons to support our current foreign policy? I see them as examples of why we should never again trust politicians with such important decisions as where to send our military.
But instead, we get a bunch of 60's retread slogans like "Love it or Leave it" spewed by a bunch of sycophants who are unable to come up with valid repudiations for arguments against the war, but continue worshipping at the Altar of Bush.
But don't take my word for it, take the words of a man who was twice awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor:
General Smedley Butler