millertyme
Member
I'd save for either a Norinco 213 or some Makarov variant, specifically a CZ 82. Both are around $200 and both have great reputations for reliability. I had a 213 I picked up for $95 and it's the only firearm I wish I had back.
You want something for home defense, and range use.
You want something in a decent caliber.
You want something inexpensive.
You want something now.
The Hi-Point C9 meets these requirements.
Very good proverb. And that's actually why I decided to buy and try a hi-point C-9 9mm. Because I took the experience of other "Hi-point owners". The experience of someone who knows this guy, who's brother's barber's mechanic's cousin, who slept at a holiday inn express, doesn't mean anything to me. But the vast overwhelming majority of hi-point owners are and have been very happy with their hi-points. And these are people who also own H&K, Sig, Glock, Springer, S&W, etc...I've long been a fan of the old proverb:
"A smart man learns from his experience, but a wise man learns from the experiences of others."
It's one of the reasons I visit various forums.
Shoot a few hundred through it right out of the box to see if it works. If it works during that period you did ok. If not you're probably going to have problems from then on.
99% of the info in all these threads is anecdotal.I also have no use for anecdotal evidence when we're trying to make recommendations to people.
I never told anyone not to buy one, but IMO telling someone that other options exist for a little more money is not just right, but also courteous and helpful as well.Mentioning to people that they shouldn't buy a hi-point pistol, for whatever reasons you have, and a "Suitable Alternative" based on similar price and similar warranty to the hi-point is a Kel-tec; is simply wrong.
Straw man.Doesn't matter what I like or not. That recommendation is simply wrong. That's like suggesting a mom of 4 kids who needs a new car because their mini-van blew up, that she should get a Ford F-250 pickup.
Not around here they're not. A used Kel Tec PF- pistol can be had for the low $200s round my parts, and probably less if you get lucky. That is not twice the price of a Hi Point.The have nothing in common. The kel-tec is between $100-$150 more than a hi-point, depending on new or used. That's basically twice the price.
Kel Tec covers warranty work from 2nd owners because they don't ask if you're the original owner. I've had them just mail me parts by me simply calling and saying i needed it...no questions asked.And according to the Kel-tec website, they say specifically that the lifetime warranty is only for the original owner. I don't care if there's a secret handshake or if you speak to them a certain way, that they might cover it. Point is, they could refuse warranty work if they wanted to, because that's totally legal on their point. That's what matters.
Taking price out of the consideration, there are models that are literally better at everything that can be quantified in a handgun. Accuracy, reliability with varying types of ammo in all conditions, ergonomics, concealability, etc, etc.Also, the suggestions of all these other guns are "BETTER" is simply not true. Better at what??????
The Hi Point can only ever contemplate claiming the title "best" when it comes to most inexpensive. In all other ways not including price there are CLEARLY pistols that do everything better than it does.For SOME PEOPLE, and for SOME USES, the hi-point can most definitely be the BEST pistol available.
I don't know much about the Hi Point but from what I'm seeing here is that their reliability is questionable so I would not get one as my first weapon.
I bought it and took it out and killed paper men with it last weekend. The gun worked flawlessly... pointed, pulled trigger, and it went bang every time. It also made holes in very close proximity to the intended destination.
If you want a gun for the range or hd, you will be hard pressed to find a gun than is better functioning for those purposes. Period. Price point is just a major bonus.
The gun works wel,l so all the bashing from detractors just sounds silly to the rest of us. Justin seems to have shown that the gun is an adequate, if not above average, performer.
HP has sold me on the merits, not the rhetoric.
Ace' if you check out the hi-point throw down thread, the last post by Kimber45 is one of the best written posts I've ever seen. Real experience and real details.
What kind of shootout are you imagining yourself in?