Thursday April 28, 2:17 pm ET
SAN DIEGO, April 28 /PRNewswire/ -- The following statement was released today by the San Diego Rifle and Revolver Association:
Assemblyman Paul Koretz, the West Hollywood Democrat who successfully pushed an unconstitutional ban on civilian owned single-shot, bolt-action .50 caliber rifles last year, has introduced AB 352, a measure that amounts to a de-facto ban on semiautomatic handguns. The bill slid through the liberal dominated public safety and appropriations committees, and is presently on the floor of the Assembly.
Mr. Koretz maintains that new microstamping technology enables gun manufacturers to etch microscopic characters that identify the make, model and serial number of the pistol on the internal working parts of the gun, and which can be transferred by imprinting on each cartridge case fired. He claims that this will aid police in determining the perpetrator of a gun crime from expended casings found at the scene. This sounds almost plausible until you consider the vast majority of guns used by criminals are stolen, and the huge number of semiautomatic pistols purchased before the proposed law's January 1, 2007 effective date. One wonders how many firings the microscopic characters would survive before being eroded. This bill is an exercise in futility as an effective crime-fighting tool.
But AB 352's true intent is not really public safety. By expanding the definition of an unsafe handgun to include any semiautomatic pistol not designed and equipped with this microscopic array of identity markings, this bill as worded effectively becomes a ban on new handguns. This wonder technology is unproven, and even if it were possible to execute, the manufacturing costs would be prohibitive, thus driving manufacturers out of the California market.
What will happen to law enforcement guns? Ronnie Barrett, Owner and CEO of Barrett Firearms, the primary manufacturer of .50 caliber rifles for civilian, military and police use, watched legislative hearings where Los Angeles Police Department officers promoted the deceptive propaganda that .50 caliber rifles were extraordinarily susceptible to terrorist use. After the ban became law, Mr. Barrett stated that his company "cannot legally sell any of its products to lawbreakers. Therefore, since California's passing of AB 50, the state is not in compliance with the U.S. Constitution's 2nd and 14th Amendments, and we will not sell nor service any of our products to any government agency of the state of California."
The San Diego Rifle and Revolver Association urges all freedom loving citizens to call their state legislators and the governor -- NOW.
About the San Diego Rifle and Revolver Association
The San Diego Rifle and Revolver Association is a California Rifle & Pistol Association firearms club and promotes safety and education in the sport of shooting. We also educate the public on the Second Amendment and legislative issues impacting the right to keep and bear arms.
Source: San Diego Rifle and Revolver Association
Can someone please clarify something for me:
I read about the above legislation some time ago.
This doesn't worry me nearly as much as the other bill to require that the bullets themselves be serial numbered.
Requiring bullets to be serial numbered is completely different from requiring guns to stamp bullets that they fire with a serial #, and IMO, the former is much, much worse than the latter, as it would essentially be a defacto ban on ammunition.
SO my question is this: Which bill is under consideration? The one to serialize bullets or the internal parts on guns?
Both??