I wouldn't be comfortable with someone practicing 360 degree hot range tactics when the line is expressly set up for precision or bench work.
I believe what we really have is too many precision shooting ranges that make no accommodation for practical shooting needs. There are ranges set up that do that - the military and tactical pistol shooters use them.
And, in that light, it is very relevant that the military does lose a soldier to a live fire incident every year in practicing CQB team tactics in a shoot house. The danger is very real.
If a range set up solely for precision bench shooting is getting an influx of tactical pistol shooters, then things need to adjust. This is the likely problem with some ranges - they simply aren't built to handle that kind of shooting. It doesn't much make a difference that it's an open range with no RSO - most share that situation every week day. It's the shooter attempting to practice something in an environment that doesn't support the event.
It makes just as much sense to practice dry firing in the checkout lane at WalMart. Of course people get concerned.
It happens at ranges, nonetheless, because we live in a land where we have the freedom to make inappropriate decisions. Posting your vacation plans on Facebook, getting a risque tattoo in a revealing area, or whatever, we see it happening all around us everyday. At my workplace, the four lane boulevard out front has a high rate of exhibitionist vehicular activity - and it's about the most densely packed in the city on a daily average. (I'm actually glad to be getting transferred away from it.)
People can and will make unintended errors, or even stupid decisions. Few come into this world with a total working knowledge of what they should or should not do, and far too many have a partial knowledge and then dictate to others limitations about what can be permitted.
When it comes down to range use, what needs to be seen is that a 400 yard firing line with benches and overhead cover stretching out past 30 lanes may not be appropriate for 15 pistol shooters who would prefer to practice draw and fire. That highlights the concept of what a range is - outdoors, we see it as predominantly a rifle facility, and those features don't work in the best interests of shooters practicing pistol. Or the rifle shooter in the next lane.
It may be necessary for the range members to acknowledge the two different and conflicting uses - and schedule them on alternate days on alternate weeks. Spread it around to fit anyone members work schedule. If there is a limitation in the facilities, then exclude the other kind of shooting on certain days and there will be nobody at cross purposes to inconvenience the other shooters - who well may be themselves later.
If nobody is willing to budge on how or when the range operates, then what you have are shooters who aren't willing to let others exercise their 2A rights. Good luck with that.
I believe what we really have is too many precision shooting ranges that make no accommodation for practical shooting needs. There are ranges set up that do that - the military and tactical pistol shooters use them.
And, in that light, it is very relevant that the military does lose a soldier to a live fire incident every year in practicing CQB team tactics in a shoot house. The danger is very real.
If a range set up solely for precision bench shooting is getting an influx of tactical pistol shooters, then things need to adjust. This is the likely problem with some ranges - they simply aren't built to handle that kind of shooting. It doesn't much make a difference that it's an open range with no RSO - most share that situation every week day. It's the shooter attempting to practice something in an environment that doesn't support the event.
It makes just as much sense to practice dry firing in the checkout lane at WalMart. Of course people get concerned.
It happens at ranges, nonetheless, because we live in a land where we have the freedom to make inappropriate decisions. Posting your vacation plans on Facebook, getting a risque tattoo in a revealing area, or whatever, we see it happening all around us everyday. At my workplace, the four lane boulevard out front has a high rate of exhibitionist vehicular activity - and it's about the most densely packed in the city on a daily average. (I'm actually glad to be getting transferred away from it.)
People can and will make unintended errors, or even stupid decisions. Few come into this world with a total working knowledge of what they should or should not do, and far too many have a partial knowledge and then dictate to others limitations about what can be permitted.
When it comes down to range use, what needs to be seen is that a 400 yard firing line with benches and overhead cover stretching out past 30 lanes may not be appropriate for 15 pistol shooters who would prefer to practice draw and fire. That highlights the concept of what a range is - outdoors, we see it as predominantly a rifle facility, and those features don't work in the best interests of shooters practicing pistol. Or the rifle shooter in the next lane.
It may be necessary for the range members to acknowledge the two different and conflicting uses - and schedule them on alternate days on alternate weeks. Spread it around to fit anyone members work schedule. If there is a limitation in the facilities, then exclude the other kind of shooting on certain days and there will be nobody at cross purposes to inconvenience the other shooters - who well may be themselves later.
If nobody is willing to budge on how or when the range operates, then what you have are shooters who aren't willing to let others exercise their 2A rights. Good luck with that.