Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hearing on BATFE Abuses (from NRA-ILA) Feb 15

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Bubbles, Feb 9, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bubbles

    Bubbles Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    3,152
    Location:
    Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia
    NRA-ILA Alert Feb 8

    OVERSIGHT HEARING SET ON BATFE ABUSE AT RICHMOND, VA GUN SHOWS

    On February 15, the U.S. House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security will hold an oversight hearing to investigate apparent wrongdoing by BATFE at a Richmond, VA gun show last August.

    In 2004-05, a troubling pattern emerged at a number of Richmond, VA-area gun shows, where hundreds of BATFE agents and state and local police staked out local shows. Immediately upon learning of these incidents, NRA began investigating and working to ensure congressional oversight hearings would be held to determine any wrongdoing and ensure BATFE was not overstepping its bounds or violating the law.

    BATFE agents copied lawful gun purchase transaction records and provided this information to local police officers, who in turn conducted "residency checks." Federal law prohibits the release of this information except to state and local police to identify prohibited purchasers or recipients of guns. The information provided to local police prompted multiple instances of officers showing up at the homes of those who lawfully purchased firearms from licensed dealers at area gun shows. On occasions when the lawful purchasers were not at home, agents questioned family members (for example, inquiring of a wife if she knew her husband was at a gun show and/or had purchased a firearm) or their neighbors. In other cases, reports surfaced of lawful gun owners and holders of valid carry permits having their firearms confiscated.

    Those interested in watching the hearings online may do at http://judiciary.house.gov/schedule.aspx.

    So now we all get to watch SIXPACK.

    Hopefully CSPAN will also cover this!
     
  2. woerm

    woerm Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    390
    Location:
    Glitter Gulch, LSR
    yea!

    Thanks for the update,

    forwarded the info to my rep Sam Johnson TX-3.

    r
     
  3. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,488
    We and all other gunnies need to bombard C-span with e-mails demanding they show this otherwise they will not.
     
  4. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,488
    Where is the ACLU whinnnnning privacy rights? Where is the MSM telling citizens of the government the abuse of power. Will we see a NYT editorial decrying the loss of civil rights and screaming about an over powerful Federal Government. NAH>:cuss:
     
  5. Sam Adams

    Sam Adams Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2003
    Messages:
    2,035
    Location:
    South Texas
    I'd like to see the hearings expanded to the incompetent handling of the NFA database by the Batf...ers. Maybe that'll get the '86 machine gun ban looked at seriously and repealed.

    Well, I can dream, can't I?
     
  6. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    This is great.

    Who will be the chairman of the hearings?
     
  7. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    Wednesday 02/15/2006 - 4:30 PM
    2141 Rayburn House Office Building
    Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security
    Oversight Hearing of "The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) Part 1: Gun Show Enforcement."
     
  8. HankB

    HankB Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    5,213
    Location:
    Central Texas
    Q: If it turns out Federal law was violated, exactly when will we be able to expect the Federal criminal prosecutions of those responsible to begin?

    A: Not before pigs fly, Hell freezes over, and the Cubs win the World Series.

    If the law requires (or prohibits) certain action by government employees, but provides for no penalties, the law is meaningless.
     
  9. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Well, yeah, but it makes people feel better, you know?
     
  10. Highland Ranger

    Highland Ranger Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    2,299
    Location:
    New Jersey Highlands
    Didn't the cubs win last year?
     
  11. KriegHund

    KriegHund Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,514
    Location:
    Colorado, Broomfield
    NRA is good for things. See.
     
  12. Waitone

    Waitone Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,406
    Location:
    The Land of Broccoli and Fingernails
    Just received from JPFO

    ALERT FROM JEWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARMS OWNERSHIP
    America's Aggressive Civil Rights Organization

    February 9, 2006

    JPFO ALERT: Congressional Hearings on the BATFE

    In August of 2005, participants at gun shows in Virginia
    were shocked to discover that while they were purchasing
    perfectly legal firearms, BATFE agents visited their homes
    and their neighbors' homes, asking questions like, "Do
    you know your spouse/neighbor is buying a gun? How do you
    feel about that?" (1) Agents obtained the residence
    information from purchase forms that buyers are required to
    fill out ... a clear violation of federal law.

    Now, seven months later, the U.S. House Judiciary
    Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security will
    hold an oversight hearing to investigate apparent
    wrongdoing by BATFE. The hearings will be held on February
    15, at 4:00 p.m. While we applaud the fact that _someone_
    is looking into the issue, we remain skeptical as to the
    outcome.

    For one, the hearing is being chaired by James M.
    Sensenbrenner. Despite the (R) after his name,
    Sensenbrenner has shown multiple times that he is no friend
    of gun owners. Author of the Real ID Act (2), Sensenbrenner
    vigorously defended the BATFE after the John Glover
    travesty (3). Not content with that, he has also refused to
    allow HR 1603 -- the "Fairness in Firearms Testing" bill
    (4) -- out of the _same_ committee now conducting these
    hearings! With Sensenbrenner's record of support for the
    State over the individual, how impartial can the hearings
    be? That it was scheduled for 4pm -- too late for it to be
    part of the evening news -- is equally telling. Are gun
    owners being set up for betrayal yet again?

    There's no dispute that the Virginia incidents were
    completely unacceptable violations of individuals' rights
    (as well as violations of federal law!). But we must ask,
    what about all of the innocent gun owners currently rotting
    in prison or left financially destitute as a direct result
    of BATFE's capricious and arbitrary actions (5)? Will the
    hearings address those who are falsely accused based on
    dubious informant tips, set up by "experts" who don't
    bother to examine the firearm in question (6), and
    convicted on the subjective opinion of those same "experts"
    (7)?

    The BATFE has been known as a rogue agency for decades, yet
    no one -- neither Democrat nor Republican -- has
    attempted to rein them in. The few investigations into this
    organization have netted at most a slap on the wrist. Why?
    Because they are useful to those who wish to gather and
    maintain power. A police state, after all, must have its
    police force.

    We must continue to educate everyone -- even those who
    neither own nor like firearms -- about the dangerous power
    of the BATFE, and the precedent it sets. If one agency can
    arbitrarily decide whether an object is "legal" (without
    any standards or documented testing procedures), than ANY
    agency can. After all, if the BATFE can decide a shoestring
    is a machine gun (8), what is to prevent the DEA from
    declaring your greenhouse a "drug manufacturing plant"?

    This issue affects all Americans, regardless of political
    affiliation. Please, please take a moment to join our "Boot
    the BATFE" campaign at http://www.jpfo.org/bootbatfe.htm .
    We must continue to make noise about this issue and demand
    our representatives do whatever it takes to put the BATFE
    genie back in its bottle.

    With all of the documented abuses the BATFE has indulged
    in, there is NO excuse for defending this agency gone mad.
    Anyone who defends, condones, or apologizes for the BATFE
    is either willfully ignorant ... or maliciously power-
    hungry. Boot them out of your lives, and tell them why. The
    American people have tolerated this monstrosity for far too
    long.

    - The Liberty Crew

    Sounds to me like Sensenbrenner is problematic. Perhaps he needs to hear from pro-2 types.
     
  13. HankB

    HankB Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    5,213
    Location:
    Central Texas
    Nope, it was the South Siders. (White Sox)
     
  14. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    Uh.....

    Howard Coble will chair this hearing NOT Sensenbrenner
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page