peacebutready
Member
The specs of the current models are all over the place, and the very thought that the newer guns should run perfectly, out of the box, is unreasonable. While parts are held to tighter tolerances because of modern manufacturing methods, those tighter tolerances don't necessarily translate to a perfect end product. The newer specs vary greatly from the original.
If it doesn't run out of the box, I personally am not interested unless I had plans to send it off for 'smithing right away. The problem there is a good chance one's 1911 will be butchered by a 'smith. I know from experience.
Tighter tolerances without the requisite quality. I'll take looser.
In the 1970's Randall, and a couple of other manufacturers got into the 1911 business, challenging Colt for market share.
This competition is good for the consumers. For some reason, it didn't seem to prevent more lemons than what should have been, IMO.
Will any of the modern 1911's, straight from the factory, run 6,000 rounds, without a failure? Hardly. However, if you spec'd that 1911 back to the original John Browning model, you might be talking real reliability.
There's an opportunity for a modern manufacturer to do just that!
Anyone know what kind of groups the original 1911 was held to? My memory is telling me either 8 or 10 inches at 50 yards.
Thanks for the good post, pendennis.