Let's have a candid conversation about GLOCKs.

Status
Not open for further replies.
R. Lee Ermey. Pompous fraud.

Uhh...what?


Please, let's not try to spin the Glock magazines difficulty of takedown into some sort of positive feature. Somehow, SW, Ruger, HK, Walther, Sig, and Springfield all manage to make reliable magazines for their handguns that you don't need to squeeze with vice grips in order to take apart. Glock could do it if they wanted to. They choose to make it difficult. Why? I have no idea.
 
Everybody needs a Glock 19.

I think that is a step over the line. I own a G19 myself. But I am not going to assume every gun owner should want one. There is a such thing as personal taste. A reliable Sig, XD, M&P, P99, etc are all on par with a Glock as far as reliability and accuracy. If someone prefers one of those to a Glock, that's their choice. No one is selling themselves short by choosing an M&P over a Glock.
 
I agree with RagnarDanneskjold, who talked about price. Police Departments have to factor in costs and at this point a competitor (like Springfield) has to not only show us that their product is cheaper and better, but they have to find the time window in the great depression for departments to get rid of firearms that are paid for and buy new ones, then the cost of training the police and armorers with the new firearms. Then the cost of new holsters. The truth is, even state police and federal departments do not have the money for that now. Glock was ready to roll at the right time when many were switching to duty autos and choices were pretty much "glock or not." Kind of like getting the army to give up all their M16's/M4's. On top of the cost factors, Glock works, they are simple to train people with and easy to take apart, low maintenance and reliable.
 
"Originally Posted by DonRon
Safeties can get you killed."

No ... lack of training and practice can get you killed.

__________________
AUT PAX AUT BELLUM

The two of you makes a fine couple ! I am going to add my own into this!

"The trigger is my safety!"

Not so....


safety.jpg
 
I really only have two complaints:

1. Terrible tactile feedback. There's very little travel and feedback with the mag release, and the take-up point for the release is very late in the travel. I find that I have to hit it twice to drop the mag. Also, when inserting a mag, there's no satisfying "click" once it's in - it just sort of stops. These types of things just add up to an unpleasant experience.

2. Unnecessarily wide. I shot a 27 recently and this "sub compact" was far too wide to CC. The slide doesn't need to be an >inch wide and the grip would easily bulge underneath clothing. I'm hoping to test drive a 36 soon to see if a single-stack mag will finally make for a stealthy Glock.

So those are my griefs. That said, I'm open to owning one at some point. I think a narrow sub compact Glock would be the perfect CC piece.
 
2. Unnecessarily wide.

I agree. When I handle a px4 or XD, I get the feeling that the 19 in my waistband is just a little too fat. I can't conceal it except for IWB. It does conceal nicely at 4 o'clock with regular shorts andd a t-shirt...just not as well or as comfortably as my 1911's. OWB concealed just doesn't work since it is so fat, unless I'm wearing a long, thick jacket. Even if I wear a long button down shirt over it OWB, it still looks like I'm oddly chunky on one side.
 
LMAO....It's double action only

Actually it's striker fired. Not DAO.
The Glock is a DAO pistol.
Once a round has been chambered the pistol is still not fully cocked.
Pulling the trigger completes the cocking of the stiker and then, with continued trigger pull, releases the striker....two separate functions....thus: Double-action.

BTW, the simple fact that a pistol is striker-fired has no bearing on whether the pistol is SAO or DAO.
Glocks are striker fired and are DAO.
Springfield XD's are striker fired also yet they are SAO.
 
BATFE say it's DAO....BTW, go post that it's a striker fired pistol at Glocktalk and see what they have to say in response!

DAO cocks the gun and fires the gun with every single pull of the trigger. DAO cocks the gun for you from the trigger, and will do so every time. Dry fire your unloaded Glock twice in a row to simulate a misfire and judge for yourself.
 
Last edited:
"Everybody needs a Glock 19."

Everybody needs a brick with a trigger? :uhoh: It feels like a brick to me. A plastic brick. To each their own I suppose. And I have XL hands.
 
There's very little travel and feedback with the mag release, and the take-up point for the release is very late in the travel. I find that I have to hit it twice to drop the mag.

Just press it until the mag drops out.

Also, when inserting a mag, there's no satisfying "click" once it's in - it just sort of stops. These types of things just add up to an unpleasant experience.

It clicks for me.

I admit they are a little on the fat side, but I can deal with that personally.
 
The Glock is a DAO pistol.
Once a round has been chambered the pistol is still not fully cocked.

That doesn't make it DAO. Double Action Only requires the trigger pull to cock and fire the weapon. If something else, such as precharging the firing pin half way through cycling the slide, is required, than it is not a true DAO weapon. Marshall nailed it. A true DA weapon is one where each trigger pull pulls back the hammer/striker and then releases it, like the DA on any DA/SA pistol (92FS, etc). DAO is naturally where you can only fire it this way, hence the name Double Action Only. Again, if you need to perform some other action, like working the slide once, to get the weapon to fire, it's not really Double Action.

Let's say I have a 9mm round with a bad primer that for some reason needs two strikes to fire. I load it in my Beretta 92FS. I don't cock the trigger, so my first shot is Double Action. I pull, it releases and...nothing. I pull again, the hammer pulls back again, releases again, and this time it fires. Double action. Same with a DA revolver. You pull the tigger, the hammer pulls back and the cylinder rotates, then it releases. You pull the tirgger again, the hammer comes back again, the cylinder rotates again, and you fire another round.

Those are both examples of Double Action. The cocking of the hammer/firing pin and the release of it, through pulling the trigger.

Now contrast that with a Glock. You load a new mag, cycle the slide, and the firing pin is preset about halfway. When you pull the trigger, it pulls it back the rest of the way, and releases it. But it didn't and cannot pull the firing pin back the whole way. If that round misfires, you cannot pull the trigger again. You need to reset the trigger by moving the slide. The means the Glock trigger cannot be DAO as it cannot perform both fully cocking and releasing the firing pin by itself.
 
brick with a DAO trigger :evil: .. They're fine guns, I sell MANY without complaints. BHP was a painful purchase for frugal me, but what a masterpiece!
 
I really don't want to get into this thread, but I can't let this go.

Double strike capability has nothing to do with determining if a firearms action is double action or not. All that matters is that:

When you press the trigger to the rear, the action

A)Draws the hammer/striker to the rear no matter how slight,
and
B)Releases the hammer/striker firing the weapon.

Double strike capability is a separate feature. The Glock is Pre-set Double Action Only.<--That's a period.
 
If 1 trigger pull does not equal 1 pulling and release of the firing pin, every single time, it's not true Double Action. That fact that there are instances on a Glock where pulling the trigger does nothing, means it's not really Double Action.
 
So me/Glock/S&W/Ruger/Kel-Tec/Kahr/Walther/Taurus/Para Ordnance/the BATFE and every other firearms authority is wrong?
 
I am going to try to post a reply. This conversation has taken so many twists and turns it is like a police chase in East L.A..

I like Glocks. I will tell you why from a Gunsmith's opinionated perspective.

Glocks are built well. They are constructed from quality materials with a good attention to details. They fit the appropriate parts tight and the other parts loose. They rarely exhibit loose breech issues. They are headspaced correctly. They have well engineered extractors that fit properly and work well. The ejectors are very effective. The barrels and slides are appropriately hard to encourage long lasting durability. The trigger parts are engineered well with as few parts as possible. The metal parts are very rust resistant and require VERY little lubrication to work well. They are very consistently well built. Glock doesn't have much if any variance in quality. Unless they have been altered, Glocks all do the same thing, the same way and they do it very well.

Glock makes great magazines. They are simple to work on and easy to clean. They hold up much better than many competitors mags and tolerate a ridiculous amount of abuse.

Glocks are easy to work on. In the rare incident where one needs repair they can be fixed easily and very inexpensively. They respond well to the attention of an experienced gunsmith and can have superb triggers to satisfy the shooter with a critical trigger finger.

Glocks do have some shortcomings that I am not fond of....BUT the issues are MY dislikes and in no way make the gun any less of a weapon. They are things that I like to see changed because they make the gun nicer to shoot.
I am not fond of Glock's factory sights, guide rod, polygonal rifling or factory trigger action feel. The rifling issue is ONLY an issue if you want to shoot volumes of lead bullets. Otherwise it is a non issue. The factory barrel is accurate and LONG lasting.

Glocks designs and interchangeability of parts is pure genius. The ability for me to stock such a small supply of parts and yet service ALL the models is wonderful for the repair center.

Glock has very good customer service. My dealings with them regarding rare warranty issues has been VERY VERY good. I sent in a Glock 19 recently. It was one of the first 1000 of the model 19's (first Gen). After several thousands and thousands of rounds it finally developed a hairline crack in the polymer behind the locking block. It was sent in...and replaced. No questions asked. That gun was VERY used. And I do mean VERY used. It had more ammo through it than most people have ever seen in one place at one time. A wonderful testament to durability.

Glocks are good platforms to customize and can be made to fit every need in every way. The modular design lends itself to adding custom parts with a minimal degree of fuss. They are WELL supported by the aftermarket, equal to or exceeding the 10/22 rifle.

Glocks shoot well. They are accurate, reliable, long lived and dependable tools. It has been my experience that of all the guns I see at police ranges during training shoots and competitions, Glocks and Sigs fail the least. There are a number of OTHER brands that fail a LOT.

Regarding the firing mechanism: The in ability for a second striker hit is in no way a detractor to the Glock design. The striker hits with authority. Glocks reliability to fire is VERY good. Should you have a dud primer then a tap rack should be used. Shuck the dead round and load another. I cannot imagine that a person would ever sit there and repeatedly pull the trigger on a hammer fired gun trying to make a dead round pop. It didn't fire...get it out and move on. Use the same response to every fail to fire regardless if striker or hammer fired. Do you (during a gun fight) open your revolver and rotate the cylinder back to a dead round to hit it a dead primer again? No...of course not.

Do I own Glocks? Yes. I have owned many, customized them and sold many customs to drooling shooters that had to have them. I will own more in the future.

The local gun shop manager and I were having a discussion about manufacture quality. I posed the question to him: "IF you had to take any gun from your pistol case and step out in the street and get involved in a gun fight.....what would you choose?" Keep in mind you have never fired any of the guns in your case. You don't get to test fire it. You don't get to inspect it or clean / lube it. It just MUST run, feed perfectly and save your life. You don't know that they will or will not work. "What would you bet your butt on?" What gun would you bet that you can load from ammo on the shelf...and bet that it will run without fail? We talked about all the brands there...Which one's we have seen fail..based on what I have fixed in NEW guns...what NEW guns have issues right out of the box.... Which brands are consistently aces. After about an hour discussion it boiled down to Glock and SIG.

I will buy a new Glock in the future....and it will be .357 SIG caliber....a Model 32. It will be fit with a NY1 trigger, Ghost Rocket 3.5 connector, Stainless guide rod, Seattle slug, and Trijicon night sights.

Many purists have an issue with the poly frame, the wierd trigger that goes sproink, the NON 1911 frame angle, the NON hammer fired mechanism and the lack of "pretty" that the 1911 and other guns have. The cosmetic aspect of the Glock isn't an issue. The striker fired aspect isn't an issue. The trigger feel isn't an issue. The frame angle is less of an issue than most folks make it. If you are a skilled shooter and you shoot a LOT....you can make any pistol run and run well. The ergonomics of the Glock isn't a downfall of the design...it is often an excuse for someone to buy another gun they think they like better :D.

In the end they are a good tool and are on a plain above much of it's competition. They are on a par with SIG. They are a far better design than the 1911 in MANY ways and fail far less often. That is a bitter pill for many to swallow....including me. I like the 1911 design and cosmetics but an equally priced 1911 just won't run as well or as long as a Glock from that same price point.

Cheers
Mac.
 
BATFE say it's DAO....BTW, go post that it's a striker fired pistol at Glocktalk and see what they have to say in response!

The BATFE also called a 14-inch shoelace a machine gun.

And are you debating whether it is a striker fired handgun? Because it obviously is...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top