I watched a couple of his videos and I found them informative. I did find it strange that in his gas piston vs. direct impingement video that he left out all the rifles that are designed with gas pistons from the ground up: say the Sig 556 for example. He spent 30 minutes on gas piston vs direct impingement and only mentioned ARs.
That was specifically about AR rifles, not about piston/DI guns in general.
-------------------
If you think he's a mall ninja, well that's your opinion.
My opinion is that he offers quality unbiased (as in he seems that he isn't paid off and does say negative things about what he reviews) vids with a ton of info and links and he does it in an entertaining way. Perhaps he does sound a bit
Bill and Ted's at times, but so what? I'll endure a few "dudes" and "what's up" and "tactical" coming from a guy who at least seems to know what he's talking about and admits when he doesn't know it all, admits he doesn't have as much trigger time with something to provide complete info, admits when he makes mistakes, and so on.
His vids are long? Perhaps some of them are. But I rarely watch a vid of his that I think is too long. There are crappy DVDs that sell for $25 a pop for about an hour's worth of boring droning by someone so stupidly scripted it seems completely fake. Nutnfancy offers these vids for free and his unscripted bullet point method is refreshing. If you don't like them, don't watch them. If they're so painful for you that is
And his vids beat the poor camera quality guy in his room with his piles of cloths and empty Coke cans strewn about mumbling incoherently about whatever he's reviewing.
Not saying you have to like nutnfancy, but so far the critiques seem like pretty cheap shots coming from armchair directors.