A few years ago, I had the same dilema. I owned a number of handguns, but I wanted an extremly versitile, rugged, powerful handgun to be mine "go-to" woods gun. Something that I could take deer hunting and have it ride in a holster for up to two weeks with rain and snow while living out of a tent. I wanted it to shoot flat, and be able to take down a big game animal if I wanted to.
My choice wa the Ruger GP-100, 4", full lug, stainless. It has served in that role with distinction. It has also become my faviorite .357 revolver. I have no complaints with it. One of the biggest plusses of the GP100 that is seldom mentioned is that it came be taken completely down to the frame EASILY. After being exposed to dirt, and moisture for a week or two, it gives me great piece of mind to KNOW that the lockwork and internals are clean and dry before I put it away.
The problem with most of the guns mentioned are that they are very loud. When I am rambing around in the back country and want to do a little impromptu plinking, I don't want to carry ear plugs, and I don't want to permenently damage my hearing. For that reason, if I was camping, or canoeing or something like that, I would be inclined to carry a .22. Yes, prolonged exposure to a .22 handgun will damage your hearing, but I think the damage would be minimal for the occasional shot. It would also attract less attention from others.
My choice wa the Ruger GP-100, 4", full lug, stainless. It has served in that role with distinction. It has also become my faviorite .357 revolver. I have no complaints with it. One of the biggest plusses of the GP100 that is seldom mentioned is that it came be taken completely down to the frame EASILY. After being exposed to dirt, and moisture for a week or two, it gives me great piece of mind to KNOW that the lockwork and internals are clean and dry before I put it away.
The problem with most of the guns mentioned are that they are very loud. When I am rambing around in the back country and want to do a little impromptu plinking, I don't want to carry ear plugs, and I don't want to permenently damage my hearing. For that reason, if I was camping, or canoeing or something like that, I would be inclined to carry a .22. Yes, prolonged exposure to a .22 handgun will damage your hearing, but I think the damage would be minimal for the occasional shot. It would also attract less attention from others.